அரசு அலுவலகங்களில் ஆயுத பூஜை செய்வது சரியே– ஐகோர்ட் தீர்ப்பு

Puja in govt offices won’t hurt secularism: HC

A Subramani, TNN | Jan 18, 2012, 09.03AM IST

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/Puja-in-govt-offices-wont-hurt-secularism-HC/articleshow/11534022.cms

CHENNAI: Is conducting Ayudha Puja or Saraswathi Puja in government offices a non-secular activity deserving to be banned? ‘No’, theMadras high court has ruled.

“Showing respect to the place of work and the objects of work will in no way offend the feelings of others or affect secularism. Ayudha Puja is referable to prayer, reverence or respect given to objects through which an individual performs his profession or occupation. Ayudha Puja in its real terms transcends all religion,” a division bench ofJustice R Sudhakar and Justice Aruna Jagadeesan has said.

Dismissing a public interest writ petition, which sought a direction to the government to prohibit “all sorts of religious activities within the precincts of government offices”, the bench said an individual showing respect to his occupational tools cannot be said to offend the secular nature of the state.

“Irrespectvie of religion, Ayudha Puja is a reverence shown by cobblers, weavers, farmers, autorickshaw drivers, rickshaw-pullers, carpenters, shopkeepers, chartered accountants, advocates, doctors etc., to objects which they use to earn their livelihood,” Justice Sudhakar, who wrote the judgment for the bench, observed.

Similarly, Saraswathi Puja is referable to showing respect to education, knowledge and the script, the judge said, adding: “The form of worship or veneration to files and records at the close of the working day preceding the Ayudhua Puja or Saraswathi Puja holidays cannot be called as religious activity by the government, affecting the secular nature of the state.”

The judges pointed out that Ayudha Puja and Saraswathi Puja fall on holidays and it could not be concluded that it was the state which performed these pujas at office. “In government offices, if an individual shows respect and reverence to the materials, books, files or records which are being handled by the individual, it will be referable to his individual freedom and there is nothing to show that it affects the secular nature of the state.”

The petitioner, S P Muthuraman, cited a government order issued in 1993 and a circular dated April 22, 2010 to seek a ban on religious activities in government offices. In December 1993, a government order said no construction of any new structure for religious worship or prayer within the office campus or modification of any existing structure should be permitted. This was reiterated by a division bench order of the high court in March 2010. It was following the HC order that in April 2010 the government sent the circular.

Justice Sudhakar, however, pointed out that the government order and the circular related to construction and enlargement of structures within government office complexes and had nothing to do with an individual’s right to offer puja for the place of work or tools. An individual’s right to freedom of conscience is permitted in Article 25 of the Constitution, he said, adding: “If the relief sought for by the petition is accepted, it is likely to cause disharmony among various groups.”

கூடங்குளம் அணு உலை எதிர் தூத்துக்குடி கிறிஸ்தவ நிறுவனங்கள் 54 கோடி ரூபாய் நன்கொடை

Team lands in Kudankulam to probe NGOs

Tuticorin church NGO got 54 Crore to stop Kudankualm

Karthick S, TNN | Jan 18, 2012, 09.15AM IST

CHENNAI: A special team from the Union home ministry is in Kudankulam to probe fund transactions of six NGOs operating in the region and believed to be working “against” the nuclear power project, top sources told TOI.
18_01_2012_001_008.jpg rAID ON NGOs

“Two NGOs run by Tuticorin Archbishop Evan Ambrose received Rs 54 crore in recent months from foreign countries, including the US. We have directed them to submit proper documents. The documents submitted by them were not adequate. So we have sent a special team for a thorough investigation. This is the third round of probe,” a senior officer in the home ministry said.

An NGO, said to be run by M Pushparayan, organiser of the agitation against the nuclear project, also got funds from other countries, home ministry sources said. The ministry had directed these NGOs to submit documents under the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act. The ministry, sources said, was not fully satisfied with the documents submitted by them. “If the ministry is not satisfied with the documents, these NGOs would face stringent action,” said Union minister of state in the Prime Minister’s Office M Narayanasamy.

The Centre has alleged that foreign funds are being used to fuel the anti-nuclear protests in the Kudankulam. The special team has been in Kudankulam for more than three days and is said to have verified the documents submitted by the NGOs. “The special team was careful not to involve in anyone from the local units. The investigation will conclude on Tuesday. The team will submit reports to the home ministry soon,” the source said.

17_01_2012_002_010.jpg Kudankulam Funds

Dismissing the allegations, Tuticorin Archbishop Evan Ambrose told TOI, “We have been submitting audit reports to the home ministry every year. The special team has sought some clarifications and we are co-operating with them. There is nothing to hide.” Pushparayan alleged that Centre was trying to spread the news that foreign funds are being diverted to keep the protests going. “The home ministry has sent a notice to our NGO last month and we have submitted all the documents they sought. They seemed satisfied with the particulars,” he said.

17_01_2012_007_003.jpg Udahakumar

S P Udayakumar, convener of the People’s Movement Against Nuclear Energy, said, “This is an intimidating exercise by the government. They are abusing the state power. It clearly shows that they don’t believe in democracy. I can assure that we haven’t got a penny from any body.”

Christianity a Lossing lie

35 Million Move In and Out of the Christian faith in 2008? PDF Print E-mail
Written by Sherry- http://www.siena.org/December-2007/35-million-move-in-and-out-of-the-christian-faith-in-2008
Sunday, 30 December 2007 13:27
Some fascinating realities to contemplate on the verge of a New Year:First of all, religious identity is remarkably fluid: for good or ill. This is contrary to what most Catholics have assumed and has helped fuel our “don’t ask, don’t tell” culture. As I wrote in part 10 of my series “The Challenge of Independent Christianity”“We tend to regard the three basic “types” of Christianity – Catholicism, Protestantism, and Orthodoxy – as essentially stable and fixed. Given the long histories and long memories of these faiths, it is only natural to think of religious affiliation as a deeply-rooted identity that changes only with difficulty and very slowly. We don’t expect to wake up tomorrow and find that Protestants have decided en masse that the Reformation was not a good idea or that the Orthodox have jettisoned their icons in favor of store-front missions. Our ecumenical dialogue is founded upon this presumed stability.

David Barrett, however, has a fascinating sidebar in his World Christian Encyclopedia indicating that a surprising amount of religious change is, in fact, the norm. As Barrett puts it, “Every year, millions of people are changing their religious profession or their Christian affiliation. Mass defections are occurring from stagnant majority religions to newer religions” (World Christian Encyclopedia, p. 5). It is imperative for us to understand that a significant part of this change is the result of personal choices, and not just natural birth and death. Evangelicals have a saying: “God has no grandchildren”.

(You can read the whole 10,000 word article on Independent Christianity beginning here)

This has been especially so in times and places where certain factors converge :ready access to new religious ideas (sometimes through evangelizers who come to you and sometimes through locals who are exposed to new ideas elsewhere and bring them home like the lay scholars who brought Christianity to Korea from China in the last 18th century) and circumstances that have prepared local people to be open.

We live in one of those times. The advent of the internet and globalization combined with the world-wide spread of new, intensely evangelizing forms of Christianity and post-modern ideas and assumptions has rendered clear, this-not-that, “steady state” religious identity a thing of the past-especially in the west but increasingly in large parts of the developing world as well. There has been some discussion around St. Blog’s in the past year about the idea that a first generation, personally “chosen” faith is not as culturally rich as an inherited, historic faith that one simply absorbs from one’s serenely homogenous, practicing family and community.

No doubt but that isn’t the choice before us. Not in 2008.

Every serious Anglo Catholic (on the left or right) that I’ve ever met in this country has a sense of going against the flow of the culture – and often against the feelings of significant parts of his/her family and friends as well. The situation is not as grave among recent immigrants from strongly Catholic backgrounds but it will be for their children.

Our situation both demands and is tailor-made for the New Evangelization. Spend a few minutes at this year’s end contemplating the following global statistics in light of our Lord’s call to make disciples of all nations and the recent CDF Note on evangelization:

19 million people convert to Christianity every year around the world. (Conversions to all other faiths combined: about 2.5 million/year)

122,000 new Christians are baptized every 24 hours around the world.

37,000 new Catholics are added to the Church every 24 hours around the world.

This fluidity of belief and practice cuts both ways:

16.5 million Christians leave the faith every year.

In the historically Christian west, we naturally been acutely aware of those leaving.

Christianity has experienced massive losses in the Western world over the last 60 years…every year, some 2,7655,100 church attenders in Europe and North America cease to be practicing Christians within the 12-month period, an average loss of 7,500 every day.

But the global result is still a gain:

David Barrett, in his World Christian Encyclopedia, estimates a yearly global “net gain” of 2.5 million Christians or 69,000 new Christians per day.

If (as is most unlikely) 19 million non-Christians became Christian and a entirely different 16.5 million Christians left the faith in the new year, it would mean that over 35 million people moved in and out of the Christian faith in 2008 (more than the entire population of Canada!) Whatever the actual numbers are, this is clearly anything but “steady state”, if-it-was-good-enough-for-mama, it’s-good-enough-for-me faith.

At the beginning of the 21st century and at the end of 2007, huge numbers of people on this planet are searching, are open to something new, are spiritually hungry. Not a few exceptional souls but tens of millions.

And a few of them are living or working or hanging out around you and me.

In 2008, how can we reach out and present Christ in the midst of his Church to those who are seeking him – perhaps without knowing it, without the words to articulate what they are seeking – around us?

ஈ.வெ.ராமசாமி நாயக்கர்- தி.க. பெரியாரின் திருக்குறள் தமிழ் பற்றிய பொன்மொழிகள்

[b]திருக்குறள் ஒரு கெட்ட நாற்றம் [/b][/size]


வள்ளுவர் குறளையும், அந்தப்படியே அப்போது பகுத்தறிவுக்கு ஏற்றதல்ல என்று கண்டித்து வந்தேன். எல்லாவற்றையும் குறை சொல்லும்போது பலர் என்னிடம், ‘எல்லாம் போய்விட்டால் நமக்கு எதுதான் நூல்?’ என்று கேட்பார்கள். நான், இங்கே இருக்கிற மலத்தினால் கெட்ட நாற்றம் வீசுகிறது. அதை எடுத்து விடு’ என்று கூறினால் ‘அந்த இடத்தில் என்ன வைப்பது என்றா கேட்பது..?” என்று பதில் கூறுவேன்.- விடுதலை(1.6.50)யில் பெரியார் 

முட்டாள்தனம் 
இந்த அதிசயக் காலத்தில் எனது தாய்மொழி, எனது தாய்நாடு இதற்காக எனது உயிரை விடுவேன் என்று முட்டாள்தனமாகப் பிடிவாதம் பிடித்தால், நாம் எப்போது முன்னேறுவது? உலகம் நாளுக்கு நாள் நமக்கு நெருக்கமாக வந்து கொண்டிருப்பதை எண்ணிப் பார்க்க வேண்டாமா?- ‘விடுதலை’(14.11.1972)யில் பெரியார்

ஹிந்தி இருக்கட்டும்
இந்தி வேண்டவே வேண்டாம் என்பதல்ல எங்கள் கொள்கை. அதைக் கட்டாயப்படுத்தக்கூடாது என்று நாங்கள் சொல்லுகிறோம். சில காரியத்திற்காக இந்தியைக் கட்டாயமாக்க வேண்டுமானாலும் கட்டாயமாக்குங்கள். ஆனால் குழந்தைகளுக்கு வேண்டாம். பெரியவர்களுக்கு, கல்லூரி மாணவர்களுக்கு வேண்டுமானால் இருக்கட்டும் என்றுதான் நாங்கள் கூறுகிறோம்.- ‘விடுதலை’(07.10.1948)யில் பெரியார்

சிலப்பதிகாரம் ஒரு புளுகு 
….அந்தக் கண்ணகியைப் புகழ்வதும், தமிழச்சிக்கு உதாரணம் காட்டுவதும் தமிழர் சமுதாயத்துக்கு எவ்வளவு இழுக்கு தெரியுமா? … இந்த சிலப்பதிகாரம் போல் வேறு அழுக்கு மூட்டை இலக்கியம் இல்லவே இல்லை. இது ஒரு கற்பனைக் கதை. கண்ணகியும் ஒரு கற்பனை பெண் பிள்ளை. நூல் முழுதும் மடத்தனம். புளுகு. இப்படியா தமிழனுடைய வாழ்க்கைக்கு உதாரணம் காட்டுவது? – விடுதலை(28.3.60)யில் பெரியார்

சிலப்பதிகாரம் ‘தேவடியாள்’ மாதிரி 
இந்த சிலப்பதிகாரம் எப்படி அமைந்திருக்கிறது என்றால், பாச மூட நம்பிக்கை, ஆரியக் கருத்துக்களைக் கொண்டு, நல்ல தமிழ் அமைப்பு உடையதாகக் கொண்டு தேவடியாளுக்குச் சமமாக – அதாவது தேவடியாள் எப்படி பார்ப்பதற்கு அலங்காரமாய் இருப்பாளோ, ஆனால் உள்ளே போய் பார்த்தால் உள்ளமெல்லாம் வஞ்சகம் நிறைந்தும், உடலெல்லாம் நோய் கொண்டும், வளையல் அணிந்து மக்களை ஏய்த்துப் பிழைப்பதாகக் காணப்படுகின்றதோ அது போலத்தான் இந்த சிலப்பதிகாரமும் ஆகும்.- விடுதலை(28.7.51)யில் பெரியார்

முக்கொலை 
போதாக்குறைக்கு ‘பெரியார் கல்லூரியில் படித்தவர்கள்’ என்றும் ‘நாங்கள் பகுத்தறிவுவாதிகள்’ என்றும் சொல்லிக் கொள்ளும் இன்றைய மந்திரிகள், ‘தமிழுக்கு, தமிழ் மொழிக்கு கேடு வந்தால் நாங்கள் பதவியை விட்டு வெளியேறி விடுவோம்’ என்று சொல்கிறார்கள் என்றால் இதில் என்ன பகுத்தறிவு இருக்கிறது? என்ன பெரியார் வாசனை இருக்கிறது? உயர்தர படிப்புகளையெல்லாம் கல்லூரியிலும்கூட தமிழிலேயே ஆக்குகிறோம் என்றால், மக்களை முட்டாளாக்குகிறோம் என்றுதானே பொருள்? இப்படியான நிலை ஏற்பட்டால் இது முக்கொலை என்றுதானே ஆகும்? தமிழ் மொழியும் கெட்டு, பாட விஷயமும் பொருளும் கெட்டு, ஆங்கிலமும் கெடும்படி ஆவதால் இது மூன்று கொலை செய்ததாகத்தானே முடியும்? இதுதானா இந்தச் சிப்பாய்கள் வேலை? – விடுதலை (5.4.67)யில் பெரியார்

தமிழ் ஒன்றுக்கும் பயன்படாது 
தமிழ் படித்தால் பிச்சைகூட கிடைக்காது. தமிழ் படித்து பிச்சை எடுப்பதைத் தவிர வேறு உயிர் வாழ ஒன்றுக்கும் பயன்படவில்லை என்பதோடு, அதற்காகச் செலவு செய்த காலத்தை வேறு துறையில் செலவிட்டால், வாழ்வில் பயன் ஏற்பட்டிருக்கும் என்பதை ஏறத்தாழ 100 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன்பே தமிழ் கற்ற ஓர் அனுபவப் புலவர் பாடியுள்ளார். – தந்தை பெரியார் விடுதலை(27.11.43)யில்..

தமிழின் பெயரால் பிழைப்பு 
நமது நாட்டில் வேறு வழியில் பிழைக்க முடியாதவர்கள், தமிழின் பெயரால் பிழைக்கத் துடிக்கிறார்கள். அவர்கள் துடிதுடிப்புத்தான், ‘தமிழைக் காக்க வேண்டும்’; ‘தமிழுக்கு உழைப்பேன்’, ‘தமிழுக்காக உயிர் விடுவேன்’ என்பது போன்ற கூப்பாடுகள். இதில் மற்ற மக்கள் சிக்குண்டு ஏமாந்து போகக்கூடாது.-தந்தை பெரியார் விடுதலை (16.3.67)
தமிழ் படித்தால் நடைப்பிணமாய் இருக்கலாம் .
..தமிழ் மக்கள் என்னும் குழந்தைகளுக்கு தாய்ப்பால் என்னும் தமிழானது, முன்னேற்றம் என்னும் உடல் தேறுவதற்கோ, வளர்வதற்கோ பயன்பட்டு இருக்கின்றதா? பயன்படுமா? தாய்ப்பால் சிறந்தது என்பதில் தாய்ப்பாலில் சக்தியும், சத்தும் இருந்தால்தான் அது சிறந்ததாகும். இங்கு தமிழ் என்னும் தாயே சத்தமற்றவள் என்பதோடு, நோயாளியாகவும் இருக்கும்போது அந்தப் பாலைக் குடிக்கும் பிள்ளை உருப்படியாக முடியுமா? தாய்க்கு நல்ல உணவு இருந்தால்தானே அவளுக்கு பாலும் ஊறும்; அந்தப் பாலுக்கும் சக்தி இருக்கும். தமிழில் நல்ல உணவு எங்கே இருக்கிறது?
இப்படிப்பட்ட இந்தத் தாய்ப்பாலைக் குடித்து வளர்ந்த பிள்ளைகள், இந்நாட்டிலேயே நடைப்பிணமாய் இருப்பதைத் தவிர, அதுவும் மற்றவன் கை, காலில் நடப்பதைத் தவிர உழைப்புக்கு – காரியத்துக்கு பயன்படும்படியான, தன் காலால் தாராளமாய் நடக்கும்படியான பிள்ளை – ஒற்றைப் பிள்ளை தமிழ்நாட்டில் இருக்கின்றதா என்பதை அன்பர்கள் காட்டட்டுமே – என்றுதான் பரிவோடு கேட்கிறேன்.
இன்றைய தினம்கூட மேற்கண்ட தமிழ்த் தாயின் பாலை நேரே அருந்தி வளர்ந்த பிள்ளைகள், இங்கிலீஷ் புட்டிப் பாலை அருந்தி இருப்பார்களேயானால், இந்த அன்பர்கள் உட்பட எவ்வளவோ சக்தியும், திறமையும் உடையவர்களாக ஆகி, இவர்கள் வாழ்க்கை நிலையே வேறாக, அதாவது அவர்கள் நல்ல பயன் அடைபவர்களாக ஆகி இருப்பார்கள் என்பதோடு, மற்றவர்களுக்கும் பயன்படும்படியான நல்ல உரம் உள்ள உழைப்பாளிகளாகி இருப்பார்கள் என்று உறுதியோடு கூறுகிறேன்.- தந்தை பெரியார் ‘தாய்ப் பால் பைத்தியம்’ நூலில்

பலரும் அறிந்த சொல்லைப் புறக்கணிப்பானேன்? 
சாதாரணமாகப் பிரயாணத்திற்குப் பயன்படும் ரயில், கார், லாரி, பஸ், சைக்கிள் என்ற பெயர்களை எதற்காக மாற்ற வேண்டும்? இந்தியாவில் உள்ள பல நூற்றுக்கணக்கான மொழி பேசும் மக்களும், இந்தப் பெயர்களை அப்படியேதான் பயன்படுத்திக் கொள்கிறார்கள். – தந்தை பெரியார் ‘அறிவு விருந்து’ நூலில்

தமிழில் என்ன நல்ல கருத்து உள்ளது? 
நாட்டுக்குச் சுதந்திரம் கிடைத்து இன்றைக்கு 20வது ஆண்டு நடக்கிறது. 20 ஆண்டு சுதந்திர வாய்ப்பில் தமிழ் மக்கள் அடைந்த நிலை, ‘இங்கிலீஷ் வேண்டாம்; தமிழ் வேண்டும்.’ இதுதானா? அய்யோ பைத்தியமே தமிழை (பிற மொழிகளிலிருந்து மொழி பெயர்க்கப்படாத) தமிழ் மூல நூல்களை, தனித் தமிழ் இலக்கிய நூல்களில் எதை எடுத்துக் கொண்டாலும், அவற்றிலிருந்து எழுத்து, சொல், பொருள், யாப்பு, அணி என்பதான இலக்கணப்படி அமைந்த தமிழ் ‘சுவை’ அல்லாமல் அறிவு, பகுத்தறிவு, வாழ்க்கை அறிவு, வளர்ச்சி பெறுவதற்கான ஏதாவது ஒரு சாதனத்தை சிறு கருத்தை பூதக் கண்ணாடி வைத்து தேடியாவது கண்டுபிடிக்க முடியுமா? கண்டு பிடித்துப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டிருக்கிறதா என்று தமிழ் அபிமானிகளை வணக்கத்தோடு கேட்கிறேன். – தந்தை பெரியார்

தொல்காப்பியன் மாபெரும் துரோகி 
தொல்காப்பியன் ஆரியக்கூலி. ஆரிய தர்மத்தையே தமிழ் இலக்கணமாகச் செய்துவிட்ட மாபெரும் துரோகி. திருவள்ளுவன் அக்காலத்திற்கு ஏற்ற வகையில் ஆரியக் கருத்துக்கு ஆதரவு கொடுக்கும்வகையில், பகுத்தறிவைப் பற்றிக் கவலைப்படாமல் நீதி கூறும்வகையில் தனது மத உணர்ச்சியோடு ஏதோ கூறிச் சென்றார்.- தந்தை பெரியார் ‘தமிழும், தமிழரும்’ நூலில்

வேறு மொழி ஏற்பதால் கேடு என்ன? 
தமிழை ஒதுக்கி விடுவதால் உனக்கு நட்டம் என்ன? வேறு மொழியை ஏற்றுக் கொள்ளுவதால் உனக்குப் பாதகம் என்ன? தமிழிலிருக்கும் பெருமை என்ன? நான் சொல்லும் ஆங்கிலத்தில் இருக்கும் சிறுமை என்ன? நமது நாட்டுக்கு கமால்பாட்சா ஆட்சி போன்ற ஒரு வீரனும், யோக்கியனுமான ஒருவன் ஆட்சி இல்லை என்பதால், பல முண்டங்கள் பலவிதமாய் பேசி முடிக்கிறதே அல்லாமல், இன்று தமிழைக் காப்பாற்ற வேண்டிய அவசியம் யாருக்கு என்ன வந்தது என்று கேட்கிறேன்.- தந்தை பெரியார்

பிழைப்புக்கு ஆதாரமாய் தாய்மொழி வேஷம் 
அரசியலில் பிரவேசிக்க நேர்ந்த பல அரசியல்வாதிகள், மக்களின் மடமையை நிறுத்து அறிந்ததன் காரணமாய், அவர்களில் பலரும் தமிழை தங்கள் பிழைப்பிற்கு ஆதாரமாய்க் கொண்டு தாய் மொழிப் பற்று வேஷம் போட்டுக் கொண்டு வேட்டை ஆடுவதன் மூலம், மக்களது சிந்தித்துப் பார்க்கும் தன்மையையே பாழாக்கி விடுகிறார்கள்.- தந்தை பெரியார்

தமிழறிஞர்களுக்கும் பகுத்தறிவுக்கும் வெகுதூரம் 
தமிழ் படித்த, தமிழில் புலவர்களான வித்துவான்கள் பெரிதும் 100க்கு 99 பேருக்கு ஆங்கில வாசனையே இல்லாத வித்துவான்களாக.. தமிழ்ப் புலவராகவே வெகுகாலம் இருக்க நேர்ந்துவிட்டதால், அவர்களுக்கும் பகுத்தறிவுக்கும் வெகுதூரம் ஏற்பட்டதோடு, அவர்கள் உலகம் அறியாத பாமரர்களாகவே இருக்க வேண்டியவர்கள் ஆகிவிட்டார்கள். ஆகவேதான் புலவர்கள் வித்துவான்கள் என்பவர்கள் 100க்கு 90 பேர்கள்வரை இன்றைக்கும் அவர்களது வயிறு வளர்ப்பதற்கல்லாமல் மற்றெதற்கும் பயன்படுவதற்கில்லாதவர்களாக ஆகிவிட்டார்கள்.

தமிழால் என்ன நன்மை? 
தமிழ் தோன்றிய 3000-4000 ஆண்டுகளாக இந்த நாட்டில் வாழ்ந்த தமிழினாலும், தமிழ் படித்த புலவனாலும் தமிழ் நாட்டிற்கு, தமிழ் சமுதாயத்திற்கு என்ன நன்மை? என்ன முற்போக்கு உண்டாக்கப்பட்டிருக்கிறது? இலக்கியங்களிலே, சரித்திரங்களிலே காணப்படும் எந்தப் புலவனால், எந்த வித்துவானால், எவன் உண்டாக்கிய இலக்கியங்களினால் இதுவரை தமிழனுக்கு ஏற்படுப்படுத்தப்பட்ட, ஏற்படுத்திய நன்மை என்ன என்று கேட்கிறேன்.

தமிழ் காட்டுமிராண்டி பாஷை 
இந்தத் தமிழ் மொழியானது காட்டுமிராண்டி மொழி என்று நான் ஏன் சொல்கிறேன்? எதனால் சொல்கிறேன்? என்று இன்று கோபித்துக் கொள்ளும் யோக்கியர்கள் ஒருவர்கூட சிந்தித்துப் பேசுவதில்லை. ‘வாய் இருக்கிறது; எதையாவது பேசி வயிறை வளர்ப்போம்’ என்பதைத் தவிர, அறிவையோ, மானத்தையோ, ஒழுக்கத்தையோ பற்றி சிறிதுகூட சிந்திக்காமலே பேசி வருகிறார்கள்.
இப்படிப்பட்ட இவர்கள் போக்குப்படியே சிந்தித்தாலும், ‘தமிழ் மொழி 3000-4000 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முந்தி ஏற்பட்ட மொழி’ என்பதை, தமிழின் பெருமைக்கு ஒரு சாதனமாகக் கொண்டு பேசுகிறார்கள். நானும் தமிழ் காட்டுமிராண்டி மொழி என்பதற்கு அதைத்தானே முக்கியக் காரணமாகய்ச் சொல்கிறேன். அன்று இருந்த மக்களின் நிலை என்ன? அவன் சிவனாகட்டும், அகஸ்தியனாகட்டும், பாணிணியாகட்டும் மற்றும் எவன்தான் ஆகட்டும், இவன்களைப் பற்றித் தெரிந்து கொள்ள உனக்குப் புத்தியில்லாவிட்டால், நீ தமிழைப் பற்றிப் பேசும் தகுதி உடையவனவாயா?

EVR ON RESERVATION:

எந்த மதத்துக்கும், எந்த ஜாதிக்கும் சலுகை கூடாது
மதங்கள் என்பவை எல்லாம் அவரவர்களுடைய தனி எண்ணமாகவும், தனி ஸ்தாபனங்களாகவுமே இருக்கும்படிச் செய்வதுடன், அரசியலில் – அரசியல் நிர்வாகத்தில் அவை எவ்வித சம்பந்தமும் குறிப்பும் பெறாமல் இருக்க வேண்டும். ஜாதிக்கென்றோ, மதத்திற்கென்றோ எவ்விதச் சலுகையோ உயர்வு, தாழ்வோ, அந்தஸ்தோ, அவற்றிற்காக அரசாங்கத்திலிருந்து தனிப்பட்ட முறைகளைக் கையாளுவதோ, ஏதாவது பொருள் செலவிடுவதோ ஆகியவை கண்டிப்பாய் இருக்கக் கூடாது.- தந்தை பெரியார்

Only CE-BCE-Australia throws BC-AD Unhistorical Jesus

Happy New Year: Australia to ban BC and AD as reference point for dates in history books – EUT

Posted on January 1, 2012 by IS

Symbols of ReligionAustralia is to remove the birth of Jesus as a reference point for dates in school history books.

Under the new politically correct curriculum, the terms BC (Before Christ) and AD (Anno Domini) will be replaced with BCE (Before Common Era) and CE (Common Era).

The Archbishop of Sydney, Peter Jensen, yesterday condemned the move as an ‘intellectually absurd attempt to write Christ out of human history’.

He described the phrase “common era” as “meaningless”, and compared it to using “festive season” instead of Christmas.

The changes, introduced by the government, were supposed to be pushed through next year, but have been delayed by the row.

The terms CE and BCE have been popularised in academic and scientific publications.

Although historical dates won’t change, with Christ’s birth remaining as the change point, the Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority ruled that teachers will use the terms BCE (Before Common Era), which will replace BC, and CE (Common Era), which replaces AD, instead.

Opposition education spokesman Christopher Pyne, of Australia’s Liberal National Party, also criticised the government changes, which were supposed to be pushed through next year but have been delayed because of the row.

“Australia is what it is today because of the foundations of our nation in the Judeo-Christian heritage that we inherited from Western civilization,” he said.

‘Kowtowing to political correctness by the embarrassing removal of AD and BC in our national curriculum is of a piece with the fundamental flaw of trying to deny who we are as a people,’ he added.

The Common Era was originally introduced [by Dionysius Exiguus to date Easter] in the Sixth Century and appeared in English as early 1708.

Its use can traced back to the Latin term vulgaris aerae and the English Vulgar Era.

Use of the CE abbreviation was introduced by Jewish academics in the mid-19th century.

The terms CE and BCE became popular in academic and scientific publications in the late 20th century.

They were used by publishers to emphasise secularism or sensitivity to non-Christians, but both still use the Gregorian calendar and the year-numbering system revolving around BC and AD.

The Gregorian calendar  – the most widely used in the world – is based on the traditionally reckoned year of the birth of Jesus, with AD counting the years afterwards and BC denoting the years before.

The term Anno Domini is Medieval Latin translated as “In the year of Our Lord.” –The European Union Times, Europe, Sept. 5. 2011

Priyanka’s- Robert Vadera Given Highest Previlages-Why?

After Robert Vadra got married with Priyanka Gandhi, Robert's father

committed suicide under mysterious circumstances, his brother found

dead in his Delhi residence and his sister found dead in mysterious

car accident. These reports were not published in any Indian media.

He is having stakes in Malls in premier locations of India, he is

having stakes in DLF IPL, and DLF itself. He was involved in CWG

corruption - DLF was responsible for development of Commonwealth

games, and Kalmadi gave favoritism to DLS because of Robert Vadra's

direct interest and business partnership with DLF.

Robert Vadra owns many Hilton Hotels including Hilton Gardens New Delhi.

Robert Vadra's association with Kolkata Knight Riders has never

been reported by Indian media.

He has 20% ownership in Unitech, Biggest beneficiary ownership

of 2G Scam. Because of Robert's involvement in this scam, there are

concerns that investigation would never reach decisive conclusion.

He owns prime property in India specially commercial hubs, and

taxi business but for Air Taxi. He owns few private planes as well.

He has direct link with Italian businessman Quatrochi.

The Bureau of Civil Aviation Security has created a record of

sorts by according special privilege to Robert Vadra, which

entails him to walk in and out of any Indian airports without

being subject to any security check. Only the President of India,

Vice-President and a handful of other top dignitaries were accorded

this rare distinction.  


 

 

‘Vadra Has 20% Stake In Unitech’

Janata Party president Subramanian Swamy has now charged that Union home minister P Chidambaram and son-in-law of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi, Robert Vadra, too are involved in the multi-crore 2G Spectrum scam.

Speaking to reporters in Chennai, Mr Swamy also claimed that Tamil Nadu chief minister’s wife and daughter, who were recently examined by the CBI, may also be made accused in the case, the DNA newspaper reports.

The Times of India also has a newswire story today which quotes Mr Swamy as saying:

 ”I will seek the PM’s sanction to prosecute Chidambaram. I will also seek the sanction of the PM for the prosecution of Sonia Gandhi, heading the National Advisory Council, for corruption”

While the story does not cite any reasons why he seeks to prosecute Ms Gandhi, the agency story has a cryptic remark on Mr Chidambaram:

He said a cabinet committee had directed former communications minister A Raja and the then finance minister, Chidambaram, to arrive at the price at which the 2G radio waves were to be sold. Swamy alleged that after becoming the home minister, Chidambaram did not pass the information to Raja.

DNA newspaper has more details and a by-lined story by Kumar Chellappan quoted Mr Swamy as saying:

“Vadra has 20% stake in Unitech, one of the telecom operators which benefited through the allocation of second generation mobile telephony spectrum by former union minister A Raja. He is the beneficiary of illegal payments generated through the spectrum scam and Commonwealth Games contracts,” Swamy said.

“The prime minister had asked Chidambaram, then the finance minister, to sit with Raja and decide the price at which the second generation mobile telephony spectrum could be sold. The duo decided to sell spectrum at 2001 prices, causing huge loss to the government. Moreover, Chidambaram did not inform the prime minister about the decision till 2008,” Swamy said.

He said Chidambaram was informed by the then home minister Sivaraj Patil that Etisalat and Telenor, two foreign telecom players, should not be allowed to operate in India. “Etisalat had links with the Pakistani spy agency ISI and Dawood Ibrahim while Telenor had Chinese links. Chidambaram did not tell Raja about this information. Later also when he took over as the home minister, he kept the information to himself,” Swamy said.

The Janata Party president said he would approach the prime minister seeking permission to include Chidambaram as an accused in the second generation mobile telephony spectrum case after the Tamil Nadu assembly election. “It will be better for Chidambaram to resign by that time,” he said.’

Unlike the TOI story, however, the DNA story is silent on his alleged remarks on Ms Gandhi. Mr Swamy had last week claimed on Twitter that he “may file for sanction to prosecute” Mrs Sonia Gandhi “this mid-April”.

Last week, there had been reports of Mr Vadra’s association with leading real estate firm DLF, on which The Financial Express had editorialised:

….we welcome Vadra’s statement when he says, he has served a legal notice on realty firm BPTP Ltd for claiming that several of its projects were part-owned by Vadra. For the government and the Congress party, however, the problem is more serious. Given how many clearances a real estate firm needs from government, for land-usage to be changed, for FSI levels and a lot more, there will always be fingers pointed if the UPA chief’s son-in-law has business dealings with a firm getting these permissions. The onus is now on the government and the Congress party to show that the clearances it is giving are not under any form of influence.

There has been a buzz that the BJP was hesitant to make it into an issue because the son-in-law of former PM Atal Behari Vajpayee, Mr Ranjan Bhattacharya, has also been under the scanner, as his name cropped up during Radia tapes and then again in the Wikileaks cables:

[Satish] Sharma mentioned that he was also exploring the possibility of trying to get former Prime Minister Vajpayee’s son-in-law Ranjan Bhattacharya to speak to BJP representatives to try to divide the BJP ranks.

In this regard, on Twitter, Mr Swamy was asked:

@Swamy39 Atal Bihari Vajpayee ‘s son-in-law Ranjan Bhattacharya seem 2 B well connected w/ congress.What makes him so close 2 congress?

To which he replied:

@seshadri :Because he is a crook.He rose from being waiter-Oberoi- to 5 star Hotel chain owner in six years of his father in law as PM.

On Monday, March 14, the Economic Times carried a story on Mr Robert Vadra, titled
Robert Vadra ties up with DLF, makes low-key entry into Real estate business, which pointed out, inter alia:

DLF has given loans to Vadra ‘s companies

DLF has also extended loans to various companies owned by Vadra. Some of these are unsecured loans or debt without any collateral. As on March 2009, Sky Light Hospitality had received unsecured loans amounting to Rs 25 crore from DLF Ltd. As on March 2010, only Rs 10 crore remained. It ‘s unclear from the statement of accounts if the rest was paid back or written off. Sky Light Hospitality has, in turn, loaned money to other Vadraowned companies such as Blue Breeze Trading Pvt Ltd, North India IT Parks Pvt Ltd, Real Earth Estates Pvt Ltd and Sky Light Realty Pvt Ltd.

Blue Breeze Trading, a company incorporated in 2007 with Vadra and his wife Priyanka Gandhi Vadra as first directors and equal shareholders, is in the business of chartering aircraft. The company, however, seems to have done little business, apart from acquiring agricultural land. Priyanka Gandhi ceased to be a director as on July 2008. She is no longer a shareholder. Real Earth Estates Pvt Ltd also had a Rs 5 crore loan directly from DLF on its books as on March 2010.

The joint venture firm Saket Courtyard Hospitality had received Rs 3.58 crore of unsecured loans from DLF Hotel Holdings Ltd, the group company that owned 50% stake in the JV. “The business relationship of DLF Group with Robert Vadra has been in his capacity as an individual entrepreneur and on a completely transparent and armslength basis.

The story was summed up by Mr Swapan Dasgupta, a journalist known to be close to the BJP, on Twitter as:

ET’s Vadra story drives home reality of crony capitalism. DLF pays Vadra 2 buy its own properties at sharp discount & get secure equity 
Monday, March 14, 2011 10:47:38 AM
 via web

According to 1 opp leader, after Bofors “winding up charges”, IPL “sweat equity”, we R seeing emergence of “political equity” in Vadra case 
Monday, March 14, 2011 10:51:57 AM
 via web

On March 16, the TOI reported: BJP, Left to corner Cong on Vadra’s rise:

On Tuesday, leader of opposition in Lok Sabha Sushma Swaraj said, “The matter is a serious one and the party is gathering documents to aise it with the prominence it deserves.”

She said the party had “entrusted” leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley to collect facts on Vadra’s rise.

CPM leader Sitaram Yechury was on the same track. “It looks like a serious matter and our party is ascertaining facts and will come up with a structured reaction on this,” he said.

But the story began to change, as Mr Dasgupta tweeted on March 16:

Resistance in BJP on raising Vadra issue is from some a of its ex-Presidents
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 2:57:47 PM via Mobile Web

which led to the following exchange:

@swapan55 is it the person who has held the maximum terms as bjp president
5:12 PM Mar 16th via Twitter for BlackBerry® in reply to swapan55

@bhupendrachaube No 
6:04 PM Mar 16th
 via web in reply to bhupendrachaube

@bhupendrachaube No, wrong number
6:05 PM Mar 16th via web in reply to bhupendrachaube

@swapan55 ok, jai UP 
6:12 PM Mar 16th
 via Twitter for BlackBerry® in reply to swapan55

On March 17, the TOI reported:

Differences were evident at a meeting of BJP leaders in Parliament on Wednesday with some leaders advocating caution while some others felt Congress could be asked some questions on Vadra’s activities. Leader of Opposition in the Lok Saba Sushma Swaraj felt it would not be good form to target family members of political rivals.

Whether or not the possible counter-attack on the BJP’s own son-in-law, Mr Ranjan Bhattacharya, whose name keeps cropping up in Radia tapes and in Wikileaks cables, is one of the reasons for the BJP’s hesitation, has not found a mention in any of the discussions so far.

Since then, of course, the focus has shifted to the cash for vote wikileaks expose, but Mr Dasgupta has persisted in following the story on Twitter:

Notice how many of those who helped the UPA win the confidence vote & also helped Vadra’s business secured Padma awards? Not incl. media 
about 19 hours ago
 via web

Re: WikiLeak, don’t forget role of internal saboteurs in BJP. Some of this later confirmed in Radia tapes. One trojan horse got Padma too
about 17 hours ago via web

The controversy over Sant Singh Chatwal was public enough but perhaps Mr Dasgupta was alluding to Dr. Kushal Pal Singh, the chairman and CEO of DLF, getting a Padma Bhushan for 2009 and the prominent name in this list in his last tweet?

 

Mehbooba Mufti Sayeed Praised Narendra Modi in NIC Meet

02_01_2012_007_008.jpg Mehbooba praised Modi

Times of India, Chennai exposed by www.theweekendleader.com -Sues for Rs.100 Crore

http://www.theweekendleader.com/Causes/853/The-M-factor.html

http://www.theweekendleader.com/Causes/861/%E2%80%98M-factor%E2%80%99-shocks-TOI.html

Rajiv Gandhi Swiss Bank account details

Attached is a photo from a Swiss Magazine Schweizer Illustriertein (November 1991)

– it shows the top holders of Swiss bank accounts at the time.
Rajiv appears in the august company of other dictators like Saddam Hussein,

Suharto of Indonesia, etc.
The text below Rajiv’s photo reads: Rajiv Gandhi, Indian, Holds 2.5 billionSwiss-Magazine-Rajiv-Gandhi

The Michael Job Centre For Orphaned Girls-Dr.PP.Job Caught In Children Trafficking from Nepal

Dr. PP Job, an internationally known Evangelist, Preacher and Missionary runs child Trafficking business

like Mother Theresa’s Sisters of Charity caught Red Handed.

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=21790736198

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/india/8856050/The-Indian-preacher-and-the-fake-orphan-scandal.html

Mullaperiyar safe: Kerala AG

Mullaperiyar safe: Kerala AG

Published: Saturday, Dec 3, 2011, 8:45 IST
By Kumar Chellappan | Place: Chennai | Agency: DNA

Kerala’s fears that the 116-year-old Mullaperiyar Dam would burst and devastate four districts of the state were nailed by its own advocate general who has submitted in the high court that the dam is safe.

“Even if the Mullaperiyar Dam bursts, the entire water gushing out of the dam could be stored in the dams at Idukki, Cheruthoni and Kulamavu downstream,” KP Dandapani, the state’s advocate general, told a division bench of the Kerala high court on Friday. This is in total contrast to the three-decade old stance of the Kerala government.

The submission was in response to the court’s directive to inform it about the safety measures adopted by the Kerala government in the eventuality of any disaster in the Mullaperiyar Dam.

The advocate general later clarified that what he meant was that the Idukki dam has the capability to store the entire water from the Mullaperiyar Dam.

The advocate general’s comments has infuriated both the ruling and opposition fronts in the state as they came out against him and immediately demanded his ouster.

What he told the high court was based on a Supreme Court judgment in 2006 which allowed the Tamil Nadu government to increase the water level to 142 ft from the present 136 ft. The reduction of water level in the Mullaperiyar Dam from 152 ft to 136 ft in 1978 following the Kerala government’s fears of the safety of the dam had brought down its storage capacity from 15 TMC ft to 10 TMC ft.

The Idukki dam, 30 km downstream, has a storage capacity of 71 TMC ft and the reservoir remained only half filled ever since it was commissioned in 1976. The Kerala government’s claim was that if the Mullaperiyar Dam bursts, the resultant flood would devastate the four districts of Idukki, Ernakulam, Kottayam and Alappuzha and 35 million people.

 

டாம்-999 சொல்வது உண்மையே வீடியோ

http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?dw4o31vr8o3ouq6

Kudankulam Protesters Threaten Windmill companies-கூடங்குளம் சர்ச் -உதயகுமார் ஆட்கள் காற்றாலை மின்சாரம் நிருபுவர்களை மிரட்டல்- துக்ளக்

Kudankulam Protest is held by Church mainly behind it and anti Hindu International Professor S.P.Udaykumar

now on the latest weekly issue of Thuglak we have this to letter to editor.

  
Details aabout S.P.Udyakumar in net.

S. P. UDAYAKUMAR

Udayakumar (affectionately known as “Kumar”) teaches at the New Jersey Governor’s School of Public Issues and the Future of New Jersey at Monmouth University. In 2007, he taught a course called “Race and Ethnicity and Globalization,” which capitalized on many of his published works. In 2008 and 2009, Udayakumar taught a course entitled “Nonviolent Leadership,” intended to focus on the theory and practice of nonviolence, with emphasis placed on Mahatma Gandhi and his influence on later leaders.[2]

Name:
S. P. Udayakumar

Title: 
Dr.

Organisation: 
South Asian Community Centre for Education and Research

 

As per this letter Bishop with 100 men cam and threatened and stopped those who were doing WINDMILL.

 

6 X 1.5 mw Windmills were laid and not allowed  to commission by CHURCH AND

Kerala Chruch Fraud-Historians reject them.

http://expressbuzz.com/cities/thiruvananthapuram/kchr-asked-to-hand-over-pattanam-excavation/333792.html

16 Nov 2011 12:57:31 PM IST

KCHR asked to hand over Pattanam excavation

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: M G S Narayanan, noted historian and Director General of the Centre for  Heritage Studies has called  upon the Kerala Council for Historical Research (KCHR) to hand over the excavation activity, being carried out at Pattanam, to the Archeological Survey of India (ASI).

Presiding over the annual meet of the Archeologists held here the other day, he said that the KCHR had not been able to make considerable progress in the excavation so far. He said that the ASI, which is the representative body of the Archeologists in the country, had only the expertise to take up such a mammoth task and conduct it in a scientific manner.

He expressed his displeasure over the KCHR’s decision to black out the media about the ‘meet’ fearing criticism from the archeologists across the country. The  organisers in the State had neither invited the media nor given the details to it. When KCHR chairman P J Cherian presented the paper on Pattanam excavation, it invited severe criticism from eminent archeologists.

The ASI, Indian Society for Prehistoric and Quaternary Studies and the Indian History and cultural Society jointly organised the meet. ASI Additional Director General Dr B R Mony, former deputy additional director  general Dr K N Deekshith and Additional Chief Secretary K Jayakumar were present.  Noted archeologist A Sundaraiah was honoured at the function.

ADDITIONS

After P.J.Cherian presented his paper on Pattanam at the Indian Archaeological Society Session it was severely criticized. Prof A.Sundara leading archaeologist from Karnataka pointed out that there are no major structural remains at the site. He  asked P.J.Cherian  to precisely record and  classify antiquities from each trench  rather than pooling them together and interpreting them. Prof. Sundara told Cherian that such approaches are not adopted in field archaeology since  cultural material from each trench has its validity. Prof .Sundara also pointed out that the claims of structural remains from Pattanam is questionable. Dr. K.N.Dikshit  former Joint Director General of Archaeological Survey of India and Secretary of Indian Archaeological Society questioned the claims of P.J.Cherian that Historical Period at Pattanam goes around 1000 BC. K.N. Dikshit asked Cherian to  be cautious and  review such claims since Historical Period in Peninsular India has not gone beyond 200-300BC

Other archaeologists questioned Cherians claims of Pattanam as an urban site since nothing was seen in empty  trenches  when they visited Pattanam . To them Cherian told that he  has left the site and structures in the trenches were carried away by local people for which he is not responsible.When he was again asked to clear as to how residential areas, streets , warehouses and wharfs  can be carried away by people Cherian was silent and stood isolated.


Saint Thomas -Archeological Frauds continues

Pattanam Track – Report by Economic and Political Weekly – February 2004 on Attempts by P.J.Cherian to Convert Family Archives of KCHR Exclusively of Syrian Christians

http://www.google.co.in/search?q=writing+family+history+by+george+vargheese&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-aAccession Date and Time 11-10-2011Writing Family Histories: Identity Construction among Syrian Christians

ON Pattanam Track- From St’ Thomas Archaeology to ST’ Thomas Family Archives

 HTTP://WWW.KERALAHISTORY.AC.IN/FAMILY.HTM.ACCESSION DATE AND TIME-11-10-2011; 2.45PM

FAMILY ARCHIVES OF KCHR KEEPS IN TRACK WITH PATTANAM EXCAVATIONS-MOST FAMILY RECORDS BY SYRIAN CHRISTIANS ARE BASED ON ARRIVAL OF ST’ THOMAS AT PATTANAM

Sl. No Name of Book Author / Editor Year 1. Kanakkalil Kudumba Charithram Kudumbacharitra Committee 2000 2 Moolepattu Kolannoor Kudumbacharithram (5 copies) K.V.Tharu 1995 3 Vattakunnel Kudumbacharitram Baselious MarThomas Mathews Prathaman Bava 1993 4 Malankara Sabhayum Vattakkattu Valanadiyil Kudumbavum Mathai Nediyanikuzhi 2001 5 Sankarapuri Tharavadu Adangapurathu Kudumbam
(6 copies) K.J.Thomas 2001 6 Mateplackal Kudumbam George Mattaplackal 1999 7 Payyampilly Koluvan George Payyampilly 2000 8 Kerala Christyanikalude Charitravum Kurakaran Valiyaveetil Kudumbavum (2 copies) Prof. John Kurakar 1993 9 Sankaramangalam Kudumbacharitram P.S.Jacob 2001 10 Periyappurathu Mathan Vaidyan Varghese Kanjirathunkal 1983 11 Chennakkat Kudumba Charitram Kudumbacharitra Committee 1984 12 Maramon Palakunnathu Kudumbacharitram Prof. Anian Alex Thomas 1996 13 Venmony Maruthummootil KudumbaCharitram & Quarterly Magazines Kudumba Committee 1998 14 Koyikkara Vadakkan Kudumba Charitram Mathew Koyikara 2002 15 Chollamadom KudumbaCharitram Kudumba Committee 1993 16 Kudumba Charitram- Pallivathukkal P.J. Ommen Pezhumkattil 2003 17 Puthuveedu KudumbaCharitram (unpublished) Robinson 1999 1819 Thottumadathil Kudumba Charitram(2 copies) Anubandham-2 T.N.Venkiteswara Pai,, 2001
2001
2003 20 Pulickal Kudumbam Utbhavavum Charitravum P.T. Poulose 2000 21 NedumthaliSwaroopam Athava Paravoor Rajakudumbam (6 copies) Prof. Varghese Nedumthallil 1949 22 Kuruvunakunnel Family Editorial Board 2000 23 Palakunnathu Family P.M.George   24 Pulickal(Pulickan) Family Directory Family Association 2001 25 Kollamparampil Kudumbayogam K.S.Kuriakose 2001 26 Mallikudumba Charitram Kudumba Committee 1976 27 Oru Vamshavum Pala Nadukalum
Kurukkoor Palathunkal Kudumbacharitram
( 7 copies) Rev Fr. Dr. George Kurakkar 2002 28 Madathunjalil Kudumbacharitram Fr.A.Adappen SJ 1992 29 Thattayil Idayirethu Kudumbayogam Smaranika Kudumba Committee 1996 30 Thuruthiyil Kudumbacharitram Prof T.M.Pailey 1997 31 Adukuzhiyil Kudumba Charitram
( 2 copies) Thomas A.E 2002 32 Thumbamon Puthenpurackal Kudumbacharitram Mathai Kathaman Mathew   33 Kadackal Kudumbacharitram K.I.Abraham   34 Edooraya Marungodil Kudumbacharitram ( 2 copies) Marungodil Kudumba Committeee 1993 35 Edathumpadickal Family History Ittiyaveera Kurian 1985 36 History of the branch of the Adangapurathu Family A.M.Mathai & A.M. Eappen 1999 37 Plathottam Kudumbacharitram T.M.Mathew 1990 38 Maritickal Kudumbacharitram M.B.Ibrahim 1986 39 Ayiroor Pakalomattom Thazhamon Kudumbacharitram Kudumba Committee 1926 40 Pala Kattakkayam Kudumba Charitram (2 copies) Mathew Kattakkayam 2000 41 Kodukulanji Thazhamuttathu Kudumbacharitram Acamma Itty Ipe 1999 42 Ambat Tharawad & Allied Families A.S.R.Menon 2000 43 Pazhoor Karuthedathu
( 2 copies) Kudumba Committee 2002 44 Kowngotethu Kudumbacharitram
( 2 copies) C.K.Kochukoshy 1994 45 Tharishuthala Kudumba Diary K.Karunakaran Nair 2001 46 Kalangaraparambil Kudumbacharitram Kudumba Committee 2002 47 Theruvil Kudumbayogam Smaranika Binu K. John 1998 48 Poovarani Pazheparambil Kudumbacharitram P.J. Sebastian 2002 4950 Meckamalil Kudumba Yogam
I Edition
II  ,, Kudumba Committee
,, 1969
1998 51 Angamali Charitravum Thachil Kudumbavum
( 9 copies) Dr. J. Joseph 1996 52 Pullipadavil Kudumbam P.V.Kurian 1986 53 Chalumattu Kudumbacharitram C.J.Easow 1999 54 Mannekkattil Kudumbacharitram Kudumba Committee 1989 55 Chembadassery Kudumbacharitram Fr. Neeloos 1992 56 Thekkepevarathala Kudumbayogam Directory Kudumba Committee 2003 57 Vellamparambathu Panikkasseri Kudumbapuranam
( 5 copies) V.P.Sugathan 2002 58 Kerala Nasrani Charitravum Parayathukkattil
Kudumbavum P.G.George 1995 59 Pavamani- The Family Tree Souvenir Trust 2002 60 Pavamani Supplement Souvenir   1999 61 Pavamani Supplement Souvenir   2000 62 Pavamani Supplement Souvenir   2001 63 Mukkathu Kudumba Charitram Kudumba Committee 1955 64 Mukkathu II Edition   1972 65 Mukkattu Kudumba Charitram   2001 66 Kathedom Kudumba Samuchaya Charitram Kudumba Committee 2002 67 Kollamana, Kalloor Madhathil Pazhangeril Manethumali Kanekkadu Kudumbam Kudumba Committee 2001 68 Ponvanibham Kudumba Charitram Kudumba Committee 1999 69 Cholapallil Kudumba Charitram  & Directory Kudumba Committee 1986 70 Pulikunnel Kudumbam Joseph Pulikunnel 2000 71 Ala Velutheril Kudumba Charitram Kudumba Committee 2003 72 Kulathackal Kudumba Committee 1974 73 Muhamma Yogyaveedu Kudumbacharitram AD 52- 2002 Chacko Jose 2002 74 Biography of the Pananthanathu Family T C Mohanan Pillai (unpublished) 75 Thettayil Kadicheeni Kudumba Charitram Joseph K.C 1989 76 Olickal Kudumba Charitram T.K.Ramakrishnan 2001 77 Poovathoor Chenamkuzhiyil Kudumbayogam T.K.Ramakrishnan 2002 78

79 Kallada Malayil Kudumbam

The Palakunnathu Family Kadhisha Suriyani Palli, Kollam
P.M.George   80 Maramon Kolathu Kudumba Charitram Kudumbayogam Committee 1992 81 Chenatt Kudumbam
( 2 copies) Tharapparambil Narayana Pillai 2002 82 Palakunnel Kudumbavum Kerala Christavarum ( 2 copies) Kudumbayogam Committee 1983 83 Maliyekkalaya Kaithayil Padinjarekootu Kudumba Charitram Kudumba Committee 1986 84 The Baker Family in India Eira  Dalton 1963 85 Kandathil Kudumbam Kudumba Charitra Committee 1974 86 Vendarappillil Kudumbacharitram Kudumba Charitra Committee 1999 87 The Palakunnathu Family N.M.Mathew 2003 88 Kuravilangad Marthamariyam Palliyum Kurakkaran Valiyaveettil Kudumbavum Kudumba Charitra Committee 1998 89 Kottarakarayude Samskarika Parambaryavum Kurakkaran Valiyaveettil Kudumbavum
( 2 copies) Kudumba Charitra Committee 1999 90 Kudumbadeepam Trimasika-Kurakaran Kudumba Charitra Committee 1997 91 Kudumbadeepam Trimasika- Kurakaran Kudumba Charitra Committee 1994 92 Kudumbadeepam Trimasika- Kurakaran- 13,14,15,16,17&18 Kudumba Charitra Committee 2000-2001 93 Arayamparambil Tharawad Charitram Kudumba Committee (unpublished) 94 Perunthitta Madom (unpublished) B.Madhava Menon 2003 95 Pavothikkunnel –Palackamannil Kudumbacharitram –I Part Mathew Varghese 1985 96 Pavothikkunnel –Palackamannil Kudumbacharitram –II Part Mathew Varghese 1999 97 Kerala Christava Sabhayum Palackal Kudumbavum Dr.Thomas Palackal (unpublished) 98 Maniyasseril Enna Tharawad R. Krishna Pillai       ,, 99 Othalakkuzhiyil Kudumbacharitram A.C. Jose       ,, 100 The Pallivathukkal Family of Kanjirapally Thomas Abraham      ,, 101 Shaikinte Veedu Family Tree Kunjamma Koya   102 Vechoorathu Kudumbacharitram Dr. K. Balakrishna Pillai        ,, 103 Ravuthurmarude 300 Varsham
( 2 copies) Salim P. Thazhethil   2002 104 Cherukad Kudumba Charitram Kudumbayogam Committee   2003 105 Kandaththil Kudumbacharitram
( 2 copies)             ,,   1989 106 Kuttippuzha Kudumba Charitram Kudumbayogam Committee 2003 107 Pandalaanickal Kudumba Charitram K.I.George Pandalaanickal 2002 108 Poozhikalayil Kudumba Charitram Kudumbayogam Committee 1977 109 Poozhikalayil Kudumba Charitram- I Edition Kudumbayogam Committee 2003 110 Poozhikalayil Kudumba Charitram- II Edition Kudumbayogam Committee 2003 111 Ayiroor Thazhillam Kudumba Charitram Kudumbayogam Committee 1957 112 Maramon Pakalomattom Chakkaalayil Cherian Cherian 1958 113 Thazhamon Kudumbam Kudumbayogam Committee 1926 114 The Heritage
( 2 copies) Varghese Joseph & M.G.Paul 2002 115 Elanjickal Kudumbavum Kudumbangangalum Prof. E. J. John 2003 F116 Velloor Kudumbam Kurian C. Velloor 1985 117 Thamarakkattu Kudumba Charithram Kudumbayogam Committee 2001 118 Kuzhichchaal Ponnampathu Kudumba Souvenir Kudumba Committee 2002 119 Thechcheril, Poothethu, Pullampallil Kudumbacharithram Committee 1992 120 Maramon Kolathu Kudumbacharithram ( 2 copies) Jiju Mathew P 1992 121 Kurudamannil Family K.C.Punnose 1998 122 Naalakom Tharawad – Kuttichira- Kozhikode   2002 123 Kaviyoor Kochiyil Kudumbacharitram Kudumba Committee 1995 124 The History of the Kaviyoor Kochiyil Family Editorial Committtee 1997 125 Velloor Kudumbam & Anubandham Kurian C. Velloor 1985
1999 126 Elanthoor Aypunnil Kudumbacharitram Kudumbayogam 1988 127 Kanianthara Kudumbam Dr. J. Alexander, K.J.Ninan, Prof. Joseph Alexander 1991 128 Kanianthara Kudumbam (Mal) Dr. J. Alexander, K.J.Ninan, Prof. Joseph Alexander 1991 129 Kanianthara Kudumbam Charitram J.Alexander 1111 130 Kanianthara Kudumbam Charitram K. J.Alexander, K.J.Ninan 1955 131 Neeliyathakathootu Kudumba Charitram Neeliyathakathootu Krishnan Nambiar 1998 132 Puthenparambil KudumbaCharitram Kudumba Committee 2000 133 Srambickal Kudumba Charitram Fr. George Srambickal 1998 134 Njarakula Thurackal Kallidukkil- Nidheeri T.B. John Thurackal 1996 135 Sankarapuri Kudumbam K.V.Chacko Kuzhikkattu 1982 136 Changanacherry Olassayil Kudumba Charitram Olasayil Kudumba Sanghadana 2003 137 Mayiladoor Kudumba Charithram Fr.Francis Mayiladoor 1999 138 Pythrikam Puthancode Kudumbayogam 2003 139 Smaranika C.R.C. Pothujanavayanasala Grandham, Kadanbasseri 2001 140 Kumpalanpoika muthal Kumpalanpoika vare The Kizhakethil Family 1995 141 Puravrithangalkidayil Oru Purushakesari Samuel Mana 1989 142 Avuthottu Kudumbham Shekharan Kutty 2004 143 Chayal Muthal Karakunnam Vare- Nedumchalil Chathankandam- Part I-(5 copies) Rev. Fr. Dr. George Kurukkur 2002 144 Chayal Muthal Karakunnam Vare- Nedumchalil Chathankandam- PartII-(5 copies)   2003 145 Nedumthallil Swaroopam Athava Paravur rajakudumbam Fr. James Varghese 2004 146 Kalluparapally Charithram Joseph Panikkar(Ed)-Alex Mathew 2004 147 Thottunkal Kudumba Charithram E.O. Abraham Elanjickal 2004 148 Chempakassary Kovilakathu
( 2 copies ) Baby Francis Chambakassary Unpublish-ed 149 Charithraveekshanavum Aarakkuzhayum George Mathew Kavalangad 2001 150 Paarathaazam Kudumbacharithram Kudumbayogam Committee 2003 151 Chiramel Kudumba Charithram Kudumbayogam Committee 1988 152 Family History of Kallath Kallath Kudumba Yogam 2004 153 Eluvathinkal Kaattokaran Tharavat Charitram Family Association 2002 154 Bhagavathivila N.Sasidharan Nair (Ed) 2002 155 Puthuchira Family History P.S Koshy (Sr) 2004 156 The Karakkal Kozhimannil Family Wing commander K. Varghese (Retd) 1994 157 Alappaat Palathinkal
Tharavat Charithram Part II Committee 2003 158 Pakalomattom Thazhathedathu Mathayil Kudumbacharithram Kudumba Committee 2004 159 Kuruvikkattu Kudumba
Smaranika V.S.Nair 1992 160 Thaadikkaran Kudumbam Edathiruthi
Valappad T.A.Jose 2002 161 Kunnathedathu Kudumbacharithram Kudumba Committee 1988 162 Manikkombel Kudumbacharithram M.V. John Unpublished 163 Vellareth Kudumba Charithram George Thomas Villoth 1987 164 Irumala Kudumbacharithram Eldhose K Paul 2001 165 Kottokapally Puthumana Kudumba Charithram Kudumba Committee 2005 166 Erakoni Nagannoolil
Mannoor Kudumbacharithram Kudumba Committee 2003 167 Thengum Palli Kudumbam Kudumba Committee 1991 168 Venmany Maruthummoottil Kudumba Charithram Committee 1998 169 Ayiroorkuzhiyil Kudumba Charithram Committee 2005 170 Thadikaaran Kudumbam Committee 2005

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

There is absolutely no mention of Jews or Christians in Manimekhalai or Sangam Literature.

This fraud is started by Kerala Churches.

ACTA INDICA-P.V.Mattews misquoted Manimekhalai by quoting from its Malayalam Translation.

In Manimekhalai all living religion scholars explain their claims against Logic scholar and Manimekhalai

Saiva vathi says- Isan is my God.

Isan is the tamil name for Vedic God Rudra Siva

Mattews quoted it as Esanite or Essanis of Dead Sea Scrolls.

Entire Pathirrupattu is about Cheranadu and fully talks about Four Vedas and Brahmins, few passing reference to Jains and Buddhism and even tells about Thiruvanantha puram Ananthapadmanaba Temple but no mention of any Jews or Christians.

As per “Standard Jewish Encyclopedia” Jews came to India only in 7th Century living in Persian Gulf Arabia after Romans converted to Christianity and were abusing them where now tortured by Muslims.
ps: I am publishing it in my blog also

http://ambedkar.org/Tirupati/

Saint Thomas fraud continues

Syrian Malabar Christian and Pattanam -From Wikipedia

 http://dictionary.sensagent.com/syrian+malabar+nasrani/en-en/

Accession Date and Time-27-10-2011;2.55PM

Syrian Malabar Nasrani

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigationsearch
For other uses, see Nasrani (disambiguation).
Syrian Malabar Nasrani people
Varghese Palakkappillil · K.M Mani · Asin
Joseph Augusty · Nayantara · A. K. Antony
Kunchako Boban · Sheela · Anna Chandy
Total population
Kerala: 6,000,000 (18% of Pop.)[1]
Regions with significant populations
 India
Languages
Malayalam
Religion
Roman CatholicismOriental Orthodoxy,Reformed OrthodoxProtestantism(minority)
Related ethnic groups
Cochin JewsParadesi JewsKnanaya,Malayalis

The Syrian Malabar Nasrani people, also known as Saint Thomas Christians andNasranis are an ethnoreligious group from KeralaIndia, adhering to the various churches of the Saint Thomas Christian tradition.They are also known as Syrian-Malabar Christians,Suriyani ChristiaanikalMar Thoma Nasrani, or more popularly as Syrian Christians in view that they use Syriac liturgy since the early days of Christianity in India.
The Syrian Malabar Nasranis are the descendants of the natives and those of the Jewishdiaspora in Kerala [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] who became Christians in the Malabar Coast in the earliest days of Christianity.[2][3][4][5][6][7] The community also comprises several ancient Christian settlements in Kerala. It has been suggested that the term Nasraniderives from the name Nazarenes used by ancient Jewish Christians in the Near-East who believed in the divinity of Jesus but clung to many of the Mosaic ceremonies.[11][citation needed] They follow a unique Hebrew-Syriac Christian tradition which includes several Jewish elements although they have absorbed some Hinducustoms[citation needed]. Their heritage is Syriac-Keralite, their culture South Indian with semitic and local influences, their faith St. Thomas Christian, and their languageMalayalam.[2][3][4][5][6][7] Much of their Jewish tradition has been forgotten, especially after the Portuguese invasion of Kerala in the early 1500s.[2][3][4][5][6][7]

CONTENTS

TERMINOLOGY

Portuguese period

During the Dutch power in Malabar (1679-1728) there were four distinctive sections of Christians in Kerala.[12][13]

  1. Roman Catholic Syrian Christians.
  2. Jacobite Syrian Christians.
  3. The non-Syrian Roman Catholics Known as Inland Christians by the Van Rheede[14] and New Christians by Moens.[15].They were grouped into seven parish churches under the bishop of Cochin.
  4. Topass Christians. (Thuppai). They were the descendents of Indian mothers or fathers belonging to the diverse European nations.

Only the first two are Syrian Malabar Nasranis. Others are not. So, all Christians in Kerala are not included in this article.

Nasrani Mapilla

Syrian Malabar Nasranis are also called Nasrani Mapillas.[16] According to Hermann Gundert (who wrote the first Malayalam dictionary), the term ‘mapilla’ was a title used to denote semitic immigrants from West Asia.[16] Thus the term Mapilla was used to denote both Arab and Christian-Jewish descendants and followers in Kerala.[16] The descendants of Arabs are called Muslim Mappila the descendants of Syrian-Jewish Christians are called Nasrani Mappilas.[16] and the descendants of the Cochin Jews who have traditionally followed Halakhic Judaism are known as Juda Mappila[17]

HISTORY

Origins

Muziris, near the tip of India, in the Peutinger Table.

On the south western side of the Indian peninsula; between the mountains and the Erythraean Sea (now Arabian Sea); stretching from Kannoor to Kanyakumari was the land called Cherarajyam, which was ruled by local chieftains. Later this land came to be known as Malabar and (now) KeralaMuziris (now known as Pattanam near Cochin) was the important entry port. After the discovery of Hippalus, every year 100 ships arrived there from various parts of the then known world, including Red Sea ports [18].

During the time of Moses and King Solomon, the Malabar coast traded spices and luxury articles with Israel.[19] Excavations carried out at Pattanam in 2008 provided evidence that the maritime trade between Kerala and the Mediterranean ports existed back in 500 BC or earlier [20]. It is possible that some of those traders who arrived from the west, including Jews, remained in Kerala.[21]

While Augustus Caesar (31 BC- 14 AD) was the Emperor of Rome and Herod the Great(37-4 BC) was King of Judea, ambassadors from Malabar visited the Emperor Augustus.[22][23] Nasranis believe that these ambassadors were The Wise Men From the East, of the Bible.[24][25] Thus the Malabar Nasranis are some of the earliest people who joinedChristianity in India.
In the first century map Tabula Peutingeriana (see the map) a temple of Augustus is clearly visible near Muziris shows the close relation between Rome and Malabar in the first century BC.

File:Italy to India Route.PNG

The ancient navigation route from the Judeo-Roman world to the Malabar coast
The community also comprises several ancient Aramaic Christian settlements in Kerala. The Knanaya Nasranis claim to be the descendants of one such group of 4th century immigrants.[2][3][4][6][26][27] while Christianity in India originated in the first century AD, after St Thomas landed in Kerala in 52 AD[28].Thus the community consists of people from many ethnic groups of Kerala including different trading diaspora of Jews and Christian settlers of successive centuries like Knanaya people.[2][4][6][7][26][29][27]
Thus the community consists of people from many ethnic groups of Kerala including the pre-Christian era, different trading diaspora of Jews [2][4][6][7][26][29][27]

Why P.J.Cherian Imports Oxford Experts for Pattanam Excavations?

BAR 33:02, Mar/Apr 2007
Biblical Archaeology Dying at Oxford University
Picture
Picture
Will the archaeology of ancient Israel no longer survive as a field of academic study at Oxford University?
Oxford has a long and distinguished history in the study of the ancient past in the Holy Land. Dame Kathleen Kenyon conducted pioneering excavations at Jericho and Jerusalem in the 1950s and 1960s. Oxford’s Ashmolean Museum accumulated important study collections of artifacts from the area. Kenyon’s successor at Oxford, Roger Moorey, was involved in the work of a number of major research institutions in the ancient Near East. Oxford’s Levantine Archaeology Laboratory continued after Moorey’s retirement and subsequent death in 2005. Unfortunately, the only remaining faculty member in this field, Professor Andrew Sherratt, moved to another university and then passed away in 2006.

Historians, Writers and Cultural activists against Pattanam Excavations-

The Hindu 22-10-2011-Thiruvananthapuram and Kochi EditionsASI Urged to Explore Pattanam

Suspecting a hidden agenda in the archaeological exploration at Pattanam by the KCHR,  agroup of historians , writers and cultural activists has urged the Chief Minister of Kerala, Oommen Chandy to ask the Archaeological Survey of India to take over the digs. A memorandum signed by Dr. M.G.Sasibhushan, Prof. N.M.Namboodiri, P.K.Gopi  and 18 others also wanted the current KCHR reconstituted and the Muziris Heritage Project  renamed as Kodungallur Heritage Project  and it be entrusted  to qualified and committed scholars.

Knanaya Church -Academy Claims Pattanam to Set Up Museum

http://www.google.co.in/search?q=knanaya+nazarene+academy+to+set+up+museum+at+kodungallur&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=
Accession Date and Time-26-10-2011; 2.20PM

KNANAYA   NAZARENE   ACADEMY in MUZIRIS
CENTRE FOR HERITAGE STUDIES
INTRODUCTION
The Knanaya Community of Kerala are stated to be descended from a group of West Asian merchants consisting of 72 families led by Mor Joseph of Uraha and Thomas of Cana who migrated to Kodungallur in the year 345 CE. The purpose of the migration is believed to be the resurrection of the Nazarene/Nasrani community of St. Thomas converts of the Chera kingdom. In order to study and substantiate the legend of the St. Thomas conversion and Knanaya migration, we propose to open a heritage museum/Study Center at Kodungallur which will be an institution devoted to the acquisition, conservation, study, exhibition, and educational interpretation of primary tangible evidences having scientific, historical, or artistic value.
The most famous museum in ancient times was that of Alexandria in Egypt, founded by Ptolemy I Soter (ruled 323–283BC) possibly on the advice of the Athenian Demetrius of Phalerum. It was distinct from the Library, and housed scholars who were supported by the Ptolemies and, after Egypt came under Roman control, by the Roman emperors. There is no evidence that there was provision for formal teaching, but lectures were given and there were many discussions which even the kings might attend; Cleopatra, the last independent ruler of Egypt, is reputed to have done so. Dinners with clever conversation were a characteristic institution of the Museum; a poet of the third century BC described it as the ‘hen-coop of the Muses’. After the foundation of Constantinople in AD 324 many of the Museum scholars are said to have retreated there to avoid the theological controversies of Alexandria.
International Council of Museums defines Museum as “permanent institution in the service of society and of its development, open to the public, which acquires, conserves, researches, communicates and exhibits the tangible and intangible heritage of humanity and its environment, for the purposes of education, study, and enjoyment”. So far as archaeology goes there are three main roles or responsibilities that are fulfilled by museums today: the long-term management and conservation of archaeological materials and associated archives; the presentation of a selection of this material to a range of audiences through displays and other interpretative means; and the researching and investigation of both the archaeological dimensions of the material and also its cultural nature as one of the agents that help to create a contemporary picture of the past. Many museums offer programs and activities for a range of audiences, including adults, children, and families, as well as those for more specific professions. Programs for the public may consist of lectures or tutorials by the museum faculty or field experts, films, musical or dance performances, and technology demonstrations. Many times, museums concentrate on the host region’s culture. There are governmental museums, non-governmental or non-profit museums, and privately owned or family museums. Museums can be a reputable and generally trusted source of information about cultures and history.  The museum is usually run by a director, who has a curatorial staff that cares for the objects and arranges their display. Large museums often will have a research division or institute, which are frequently involved with studies related to the museum’s items, as well as an education department, in charge of providing interpretation of the materials to the general public. The director usually reports to a higher body, such as a governmental department or a board of trustees. Objects come to the collection through a variety of means. Either the museum itself or an associated institute may organize expeditions to acquire more items or documentation for the museum. More typically, however, museums will purchase or trade for artifacts or receive them as donations or bequests.
The design of museums has evolved throughout history. Museum creation begins with a museum plan, created through a museum planning process. Some of these experiences have very few or no artifacts and do not necessarily call themselves museums; the Griffith Observatory in Los Angeles and the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia, being notable examples where there are few artifacts, but strong, memorable stories are told or information is interpreted. In contrast, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. uses many artifacts in their memorable exhibitions. Notably, despite their varying styles, the latter two were designed by Ralph Appelbaum Associates. Most mid-size and large museums employ design staff for graphic and environmental design projects, including exhibitions. In addition to traditional 2-D and 3-D designers and architects, these staff departments may include audio-visual specialists, software designers, audience research and evaluation specialists, writers, editors, and preparators or art handlers. These staff specialists may also be charged with supervising contract design or production services. The present project will combine the meaning of museum into an academy as an edifice of a living monument which is the ancient Knanaya community in Kerala.
Heritage tourism is a branch of tourism oriented towards the cultural heritage of the location where tourism is occurring. Culture has always been a major object of travel. Cultural attractions play an important role in tourism at all levels, from the global highlights of world culture to attractions that underpin local identities. According to the Weiler and Hall, culture, heritage and the arts have long contributed to appeal of tourist destination. However, in recent years ‘culture’ has been rediscovered as an important marketing tool to attract those travelers with special interests in heritage and arts. According to the Hollinshead, cultural heritage tourism is the fastest growing segment of the tourism industry because there is a trend toward an increase specialization among tourists. This trend is evident in the rise in the volume of tourists who seek adventure, culture, history, archaeology and interaction with local people. Cultural heritage tourism is important for various reasons; it has a positive economic and social impact, it establishes and reinforces identity, it helps preserve the cultural heritage, with culture as an instrument it facilitates harmony and understanding among people, it supports culture and helps renew tourism (Richards, 1996). The objectives which Cultural heritage tourism must meet within the context of sustainable development are – the conservation of cultural resources, accurate interpretation of resources, authentic visitors’ experience and the stimulation of the earned revenues of cultural resources. Cultural heritage tourism is not only concerned with identification, management and protection of the heritage values but it must also be involved in understanding the impact of tourism on communities and regions, achieving economic and social benefits, providing financial resources for protection, as well as marketing and promotion (J. M. Fladmark, 1994).  The overall purpose is to gain an appreciation of the past. It also refers to the marketing of a location to members of a Diaspora who have distant family roots there.
THEME OF THE KNANAYA NAZRENE HERITAGE TOURISM PROJECT
The project revolves around the theme of the Knanaya and Nasrani Sabha of Kerala. These communities have existed as the Thekkumbhagom and Vadakkumbhagom communities since ancient times. The core of the project is to trace the origins of these two communities prior to the 4th century and also their activities from the 4th Century till the 16th Century.
While the Vadakkumbhagom origins could possibly be traced to the unconfirmed advent of St. Thomas to Muziris in about AD 52, the Thekkumbhagom community is believed to have migrated to Kodungallur from three different places in the Middle East – Cana/Jerusalem, Edessa and Mesopotamia. The 72 migrant families are believed to have belonged to 7 Tribes – Haddai, Belkuth, Mezboth, Thezvoth, Baji, Khoja and Kujalik (according to Sri. E M Philip). But both these communities show a strong influence of the Essene community that existed in the wilderness of the Dead Sea coast at Qumran near Masada upto the 1st Century AD until they were resettled in the caves of Edessa and the marshlands of Iran, Iraq and Sabaa or Yemen. This community, also known as the Jamesian Community, was revered for their simplicity, piety, humility and perseverance in upholding their faith without succumbing to torture, humiliation or pressure.
 It is also believed that this Jamesian community is the remnant group which was preserved by God as the Holy community from the time of Noah. History claims that this community became extinct after the Synod of Nicea in 325 AD when all the Nazarene sects were forced to merge into the Universal Christian Church shedding their Jewish identity upon the threat of excommunication. But could this community have died out or did this community merge with the St. Thomas Christians of Kerala? Could a community chosen by God to be the remnant ones become extinct by the act of man? Is the Knanaya community a remnant community preserved thus far by God? What happened to the remaining members of the Knanaya community that did not take the ship to Kodungallur in AD 345? Did they perish in their identity or are they somewhere out there in the Middle East still holding on to their identity? Can this community come to an end because there is a talk that the membership of the community is dwindling rapidly? Are we seeing a weeding out process from the Holy Remnant Community? Or, is this community a mere creation of superstitions and caste identity adopted from the ancient Kerala caste system? This is the core matter which needs to be probed through this project and the answer should be found and published to the interested audience across the globe.
The odyssey of the remnant Knanaya community of Kerala is the subject matter of this project and thus this project has nothing to do with religious emotion or creation of a mythical story to justify any particular Church denomination. The study will be led by internationally acclaimed academicians involved in research into ancient Jewish, Nazarene, Christian, Muslim and Hindu communities besides the archaeologists, anthropologists and secular historians involved in studies regarding the ancient Spice trade of Muziris. A 50 cent property is being acquired at the northern river bank of the Periyar adjacent to the ancient Kottapuram market which once served as the major port for the loading of the European ships with spices and other products of trade. This site will serve as a study center cum museum with accommodation and other facilities. The Study Center will be the rallying point for research and will invite the above scholars to conduct seminars, help in translations as well as interpretation of ancient texts. There will be a resident history community who will be employed to study the ancient evidences which will be acquired from different parts of the world and which will consist of copies of source documents in ancient languages such as Greek, Latin, Hebrew, Aramaic, Syriac, Portuguese and Dutch besides commentaries in French, German and English. The students will be involved in understanding these source documents from the perspective of the Knanaya and St. Thomas Christians and will translate these works based on these local perspectives for which they will involve internationally renowned scholars. The works will be published by the Research Center in the local vernacular as well as in English meant for the international audience. Hence there will be a book shop selling publications of other publishers as well as own publications. A good income will come in the form of residential accommodation and tutoring of heritage oriented tourists on an academic holidy where they could be given an insight into the findings of the research center. The hospitality part of this cultural heritage tourism will be handled very professionally by experts in the Hospitality industry. There will be ten rooms available at a rate of about Rs. 1500/- per day. An entry fee of about Rs. 50/- will be charged against each visitor to the Museum maintained by the academy. There will be a well researched ethnic Syrian Nazarene restaurant and bakery which will serve Nasrani cuisine and rice based food products to the residents and guests at a healthy price. 30% occupancy of the rooms will give an income of about Rs. 135,000/- per month. We expect about 200 visitors per week to the museum which will fetch an income of about Rs. 40,000/- per month. Hence, we anticipate an initial income of Rs. 175,000/- which will give a healthy operational profit to keep the operations functioning smoothly. Over course of time, with added interest in the project, the occupancy and museum visits will increase giving a much higher turnover of atleast Rs. 400,000/- per month or an annual turnover of Rs. 50 Lakhs. This income will be over and above the income earned from the ethnic restaurant and bakery as well as sale of publications. This centre can accommodate atleast 4000 Knanaya youth per annum so as to guide the interested community youth about the antiquity of the historic community.
According to the Tourism Industry experts, heritage tourism is tipped to be the emerging model for international travel and tourism, where tourists known as the Alert Informed Individuals belonging to respected global communities with high income, seek mental stimulation by learning and understanding various communities and activities in other parts of the world. The Kerala State Government has initiated a Muziris Heritage Tourism project at a cost of Rs. 140 Crores covering Pallipuram, Paravur, Chennamangalam and Kodungallur. The project is based on the recent excavations by the Kerala Council for Historical Research (KCHR) in 2007 & 2008 which unearthed the archaeological and historical evidence confirming the location of the ancient port of Muziris at Pattanam in Paravur. This excavation project proved to be a turning point as it provided a wealth of information on the surrounding areas covering the hinterland of the Muziris port and the whole Periyar basin. Muziris was an active port from the 1st century BC onward, not only for Indo-Roman trade, but also trade with Jews, Nazarenes, Arabs, Portuguese, Dutch, Chinese, British, and many other travellers. The project draws inspiration from all this evidence and is called the Muziris Heritage Site (MHS). The Muziris Heritage Project naturally lends itself to bringing back memories of the past and the project is not about tourism or recreation alone. It is about making a difference – a big difference to conservation, restoration, the study of history, environmental projects, research, development of craft and art forms, occupations and other community activities also.
The Knanaya Nazarene Academy in Muziris is intended to blend into the Muziris Heritage Project of the State Government and shall focus on the study, research and propagation of the antiquity of the community and its practices. The project will be based on the Essene community model. A special advisory Board will be set up to oversee and advise the Company in the project consisting of experts such as Mr. Jose Dominic, the Chairman and Managing Director of CGH Earth (formerly Casino Group) and distinguished scholars such as Dr. Robert Eisenman, Dr. Shalva Weil, Dr. Federico De Romanis and Dr. Shinu Abraham besides others who will be incorporated according to the need of the period to aid and advise the Company to fulfill its objective.  Mr. Jose Dominic has agreed to be the Chairman of this Board and is highly regarded as a man with the vision to make the Muziris Project an Internationally visible cultural center. He has played host to many of the international scholars who have toured Kerala regarding research in the subject matter and they have all been very appreciative of the hospitality at his various resorts such as Coconut Lagoon, Marari Beach Resort, Spice Village, Brunton Boatyard and Casino Hotel. His vast experience and expertise in the Hospitality industry combined with his interest in the subject matter of this project will ensure that the project is run at very high standards. The management Board of the Company shall implement the recommendations of the Advisory Board.

Kathkali Club Demands Withdrawal of Brochure By Pattanam-Muziris Project

 http://ibnlive.in.com/news/kathakali-club-demands-withdrawal-of-brochure/195080-60-122.html
Accession Date and Time 26-10-2011; 2.00PM
Express News Service-October 22-2011
KOCHI: Expressing concern over the portrayal of the Vivek Vilasini’s picture that depicts a Kathakali artist as a muscle man in a loin cloth, in the brochure of Kochi-Muzirius Biennial,those associated with the Ernakulam Kathakali club said that the picture wounded the sentiments of Kathakali artists. They demanded the withdrawal of the brochure.
K Sukumaran, secretary, Kathakali club said that the picture was displayed in an unethical manner. “It will certainly sent a wrong signal about our noble culture,” he said. He was of the opinion that such a picture should not have been included in the brochure.
‘Express’ had reported about the vulgar portrayal of Kathakali in Kochi-Muziris Biennial brochure on Thursday.

Vulgar Portrayal of Traditional Culture as Part of Pattanam -Muziris Project Brings Public Protest

 http://ibnlive.in.com/news/vulgar-portrayal-of-kathakali-kicks-up-row/194636-60-122.html
   Accession Date and Time  26-10-2011; 1.55PM

Vulgar Portrayal Of Kathkali Kicks Up Row

Express News Service -October 20-2011
KOCHI: The Kochi-Muziris Biennale brochure has kick started a controversy among the Kerala art world, with Kathakali artists and art lovers coming up against the vulgar portrayal of the traditional art form in it.

The brochure brought out as part of the Biennale has the picture of a painting with a Kathakali dancer’s embellished head on the body of a muscleman wearing just a loin cloth with mace in hand.The brochure brought out without any aesthetic sense borders on the farcical, to say the least, opines Kathakali artists and art lovers. The picture is that of a painting of� artist Vivek Vilasini titled ‘Between one shore and several others –Just what is it’.
Kochi-Muziris Biennale, which is slated to showcase India’s rich cultural and social heritage, should not have included such a painting in its brochure, which will be circulated the world over. It is vulgarising the traditional art form of Kerala, Kalamandalam Gopi told Express. �
It was quite saddening to see that Kathakali artists were being insulted, he said. “Artists like me will never have any respect for those� who have been bold enough to include such a picture in that brochure,” Gopi said and asked the authorities to do away with such paintings in brochures. He said that the culture department should also look into it and see if such a vulgar portrayal of Kathakali could give� meaning to the Kochi-Muziris Biennale.
“Though the artist could have his own interpretation for his painting, the organisers could have selected pictures that did not hurt the sentiments of the people of the the state. Moreover, they should have taken care to include pictures that was rich in the tradition and culture of the state and the country”, Gopi said.
P Narayana Kurup, Kathakali researcher and� poet said that such a picture on the brochure of Kochi-Muziris Biennale was an insult to Kerala’s tradition. “The picture should not have been included in the brochure, as it would be circulated the world over. It is really humiliating to the art form of Kerala”, he said. “Even if it is considered an artist’s individual work, one cannot tolerate it,” he said.
M V Narayanan, a critic of drama and art forms, said that he did not find any politically problematic situation in bringing in the Kathakali aspect into the painting. Pointing out that the picture did not belong to the master class, he said that, art was an individual’s own creation. Ramesh Varma, a teacher at the Department of Drama at Sree Sankaracharya university, who is also an art critic and a lover of Kathakali said that the picture had no quality.
Artistic director of the Biennale Bose Krishnamachari did not respond.

Mar Thoma Church Claims Pattanam As Sacred Site

http://www.ottawamarthoma.ca/pages/about_mtc.html
Accession Date and Time -26-10-2011; 1.40PM

ABOUT US
  • The Mar Thoma Church at a Glance

    The Mar Thoma Church is a Christian denomination from Kerala, the south-western state of India. The Mar Thoma Church descends from the original Malankara Church that was established by Thomas the Apostle, who came to India in AD 52, around the same time Saint Paul (68 AD) established the church in Corinth.
    The official name of the Church is Malankara Mar Thoma Suriyani Sabhaor in English Malankara Mar Thoma Syrian Church. Short form is “Marthoma Sabha” or Mar Thoma Church. Malankara is cognate of the name Maliankara, a place near Muziris, where Thomas the Apostle first landed in Kerala. “Mar Thoma” or “Marthoma” is Aramaic, and means Saint Thomas. The original liturgical language used by Malankara Church was Aramiac and Hebrew. The Bible that was in use was in Hebrew. Later when Syriac replaced Aramiac in eastern countries, Malankara Church also started using Syriac. Members of the church are often referred to as Marthomites.
    The Mar Thoma Church defines itself as “Apostolic in origin, Universal in nature, Biblical in faith, Evangelical in principle, Ecumenical in outlook, Oriental in worship, Democratic in function, and Episcopal in character.
    The Church currently has over one million members around the world. The membership of the Church is centred in the southern Indian state of Kerala but it has spread with the 20th-century Indian diaspora to North America, Europe, the Middle East, Malaysia, Singapore, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand, in addition to a sizeable population in the rest of India. It is independent and indigenous. Its regular work as well as special projects are entirely financed by contributions from its members at home and abroad.

  • Early Period

    On the south western side of the Indian peninusula; between the mountains and the Erythraean Sea (now Arabian Sea); stretching from Kannoor to Kanyakumari was the land called Cherarajyam, which was ruled by local chieftens. Later this land came to be known as Malabar (now Kerala). It was to this country Kerala, Thomas the Apostle, one of the disciples of Jesus Christ arrived in the first century (believed to be in 52 AD). He landed at Muziris (now known as Pattanam near Cochin on the Malabar Coast).

    Even before the time of Christ, during the time of Moses and King Solomon, there was trade in spices and luxury articles between Malabar Coast and Palestine. Excavations carried out at Pattanam in 2008 have given more evidences to the maritime trade between Kerala and the Mediterranean ports. During the second exile (586 BC) some of the Jews came and settled in Kerala. They were known as Bene Israel. During St. Thomas’ stay some among the Jews and the local wise men became followers of Jesus of Nazareth. They were called Nazranis, meaning “followers of Jesus of Nazareth” or Malankara Christians. After leaving Malankara, St. Thomas proceeded to the East coast of India and died a martyrs’ death (72 AD) at a place called Mylapore in Tamil Nadu.

    Synod of Diamper

    St. Thomas Christians (Malankara Christians) remained in communion with the Orthodox Church of the East until their encounter with the Portuguese Catholics in 1498. The Portuguese started settling in India with the arrival of Vasco Da Gama on Sunday, May 20, 1498. From that time the Portuguese were powerful in the western parts of India and had control over the sea routes. The Malankara Church had hardly any contact with the Christians of Europe. Many of them did not even know that there was a Pope in Rome. But the Portuguese used their power to bring the Malankara Church under the supremacy of Rome. A powerful Archbishop Aleixo de Menezes arrived in Goa in 1595. He then convened a Synod at Udayamperoor, south of Ernakulam, from 20–26 June, 1599. This is known as the Synod of Diamper. Here the Archbishop demanded obedience to the supreme Bishop of Rome. The representatives sent from various parishes in and around Cochin were forced to accept the decrees read out by the Archbishop. The Portuguese Padroadowas extended over them. Thus those parishes of the Malankara Church were made part of the Catholic Church under Pope of Rome. But the remaining churches continued their original Apostolic beliefs and practices. The language of liturgy of the Roman Church was Latin and that of Nazranis was Syrian (Aramiac). To distinguish these two groups, later the Roman Catholics called themselves Latin Christians and the other Malankara Nazranis were referred asSyrian Christians.

    Coonan Cross Oath (Crooked Cross Oath)

    The Portuguese refused to accept the legitimate authority of the Indian hierarchy and its relation with the Orthodox East Syrians. For almost half a centure after the Synod of Daimper these Christians were under the Latin Bishops who were appointed either by the Portuguese Padroado or by the Roman Congregation of Propaganda Fide. Every attempt to resist the latinization process was branded by them heretical. Under an indigenous archdeacon, the Thomas Christians resisted, but the result was disastrous.
    On Friday, January 24, 1653 (M.E. 828 Makaram 3), under the leadership of Malanakra Mooppen Thomas, Nazranis around Cochin gathered at Mattancherry church and made an oath that is known as Oath at the Crooked Cross. About 20,0000 people marched holding a rope tied to a Cross vowing that neither they or their descendants to come would have anything to do with the Roman Catholic Church or the Pope; and that they would stop obeying the missionaries.

    MarThoma Metropolitans

    After The Great Swearing at the Crooked Cross, the parish elders (Idavaka Mooppens) of the Church met together and elected Kuravilangad Parampil Thomas Kathanar as Malankara Elder (Malankara Mooppen). Following the ancient custom, twelve Idavaka Mooppens laid their hands on him and appointed him as Malankara Mooppen. However, the Portugese refused to accept his legitimate authority without an ordination by a bishop as was the practice in Portugese (Catholic) churches. Under impending annexation of their Church, the Marthoma Nazranis sent letters to various other eastern Churches asking to send a bishop. Mar Gregorios the Patriarch of Jerusalem, was the first to respond and arrived in India to regularise the ordination. Thus began the relation between the Malankara Church and the Antiochian Jacobite church.
    In 1653, Malankara Mooppen Thomas, was consecrated with the title Mar Thoma (Mar Thoma I) by Mar Gregorios. The throne used for this consecration in 1653 is still in the possession of the Mar Thoma Church and kept in the Poolatheen, the residence of the Malankara Marthoma Metropolitan at Tiruvalla, Kerala, India. It has been used in the installation of every Mar Thoma Metropolitan, to this day, so that the continuity of the throne of Mar Thoma is ensured.

    MarThoma Church Today!

    Our headquarters is located in the city of Thiruvalla in Kerala State, India. Our spiritual father is The Most Rev. Dr. Joseph Mar Thoma, Metropolitan of the Mar Thoma Church. Our Diocesan Bishop, the Rt. Rev. Dr. GeeVarghese Mar Theodosuis, provides spiritual and administrative oversight from the Sinai Mar Thoma Center in Merrick, NY, U.S.A. The church is a reformed Oriental Orthodox Church and has members throughout the world. Our reformed liturgies are based on the liturgies of the Antiochene Patriarchate that have been translated into Malayalam, English, and other regional languages of India.
    Our church is very proud of our ecumenical relations. We are one of the founding members of the World Council of Churches as well as the National Council of Churches in India. We are full-fledged members of the Canadian Council of Churches and other regional ecumenical bodies. Moreover, we are in full communion with the Anglican See of Canterbury and all her regional identities – including the Anglican Church of Canada, the Churches of South India and North India, and the Old Catholic Church of Utrecht.

Old Testament and Pattanam Archaeology Links Provided by church

http://www.spiritus-temporis.com/syrian-malabar-nasrani/history.html
Accession Date and Time-19-10-2011; 5.05PM
The Syrian Malabar Nasrani people, also known as Saint Thomas Christians and Nasranis are anethnoreligious group from KeralaIndia, adhering to the various churches of the Saint Thomas Christian tradition.During the time of Moses and King Solomon, the Malabar coast traded spices and luxury articles with Israel. ‘’Bible’’; I Kings. 9:26-28; 10:11,22; 2 Chronicles: 8:18; 9:21. Excavations carried out at Pattanam in 2008 provided evidence that the maritime trade between Kerala and the Mediterranean ports existed back in 500 BC or earlier KeralaCouncil for Historical Research findings in 2006-08.. It is possible that some of those traders who arrived from the west, including Jews, remained in Kerala. Edna Fernadez. The last Jews of Kerala.- The two thousand year history of India’s forgotten Jewish community. Skyhorse Publishing. c.2008. p. 80

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
While Augustus Caesar (31 BC- 14 AD) was the Emperor of Rome and Herod the Great (37-4 BC) was King of Judea, ambassadors from Malabar visited the Emperor AugustusNicolaus of DamascusMathew N.M. St. Thomas Christians of Malabar Through Ages, Tiruvalla, C.S.S. 2003. ISBN 81-7821-008-8. Nasranis believe that these ambassadors were The Wise Men From the East, of the Bible.Matthew 2:1Mathew, N.M. Malankara Marthoma Sabha Charitram, (History of the Marthoma Church), Volume 1.(2006). Page 68-69. Thus theMalabar Nasranis are some of the earliest people who joined Christianity in India

Balant Lies Given to Press on Pattanam By Excavators. No Such References in New Reports by KCHR

Wikipedia brings out Hidden Agenda Behind Pattanam Excavations

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muziris
Accession date and Time19-10-2011; 3.45PMWikipedia Brings out Perspective of Dr. R.Nagaswamy, former director of Tamil Nadu state Archaeology that there is hidden agenda behind Pattanam excavations to identify it with landing spot of St’ Thomas

George Menachery, Secretary of Church History Association of India (CHAI) Highlights Pattanam Early in 2004

http://nazraney.com/journal12.htm
Accession Date and Time 18-10-2011;4.15PMGRANITE OBJECTS IN KERALA CHURCHES: An Investigation into their Distribution, Antiquity, and Significance.
Paper presented by Prof. George MENACHERY, LIRC, Mount St. Thomas, Kakkanad, October 19-21, 2004.

A recent instance is the discovery of a large selection of artefacts such as a Chera coin with elephant, ankusha, bow & arrow of the 1st. century CE, a portion of an amphora, shards of pottery, bricks used in construction, ringwells, beads, rouletted ware, b&w ware… all from the early historical layer during excavations conducted by Dr. Shajan and Dr. Selvakumar at Pattanam near Parur on the south bank of the present Periyar river, a few miles to the south of Kodungallur. Roberta Tomber of the University ofSouthamton, , Dr. P.J.Cherian and many others believe that this was the site of the ancient Muziris of the first century Greek and Roman writers. Cf. their papers presented at the seminar conducted by the Kerala Historical Research Society, Sahitya Academy, Trichur. Also see the Administration Reports of the Royal Cochin Archaeologists, Rama Pishariti and Anujan Achan for pre-independence years, reprinted in George Menachery, ed. The St. Thomas Christian Encyclopaedia of India, Trichur, 1973, left col.,p.53 to right col., p.159. Cf. “Numismatics at the Service of Historical Research,” papers presented by G. Menachery at the Madras and Karur congresses of the Numismatic Society of Tamilnadu and at the Thrissur, Kanyakumari, and Veliyanad conferences of the Numismatic Society of South India. Some of these papers may be read in the issues of the HARP, Kottayam (Ed. Dr. Jacob Thekkepparambil); The St. Thomas Christians Journal,Rajkot (Ed. Bp. Gregory Karotemprel); and the many issues of the electronic journal ‘Light of Life,’ 2003 – 2004, New York, N.Y. One such work is the ‘Anthropology of the Syrian Christians’, L. K. Anantha Krishna Ayyar, 1926, Ernakulam portions from which have been reprinted in ICHC I, pp. 485 et. sq. The excellent translations of the Tharisappalli Christian plates of 849 CE and the Jewish plates in Cultural Symbiosis, M. G. S. Narayanan, Kerala Society Papers, 1972 are essential tools for all students of Early medieval Kerala history and culture. See “Roads to India,” article by Maggie G. Menachery in the St. Thomas Christian Encyclopaedia ofIndia, II,Trichur, 1973, Ed. G. Menachery. This topic is elaborately treated in Chapter I of Kodungallur:.. G. Menachery and W. Chakkalakkal, 1987,(reprint 2000), Azhikode. A. C. Perumalil SJ, The Apostles in India, Fact or Fiction?, 1952, Patna elaborately deals with the first century Roman and Greek contacts with India and Kerala. K. S. Matthew and collaborators have much on early and middle second millennium ocean trade. The tectonic plate below the area from Palayoor to Parur is supposed to be the largest one in Kerala and as such earthquakes &c. were quite rare in this area, helping the development of a continuous civilization here, giving birth to the growth of Muziris and other famous international trade centres down the centuries. Cf. Menachery, notes to Chapter I of Kodungallur: above. The Malayalee ought to study the Sangham literature with some enthusiasm as it is the common heritage of all South Indians. The reluctance of certain historians and authors, especially of the secular historians and scholars of Kerala , to refer to the Sangham literature is somewhat beyond one’s comprehension. The neglect especially of the beautiful lines of the Aka-nanooru, the Pura-Nanooru and the Pathittuppathu has no justification except the prejudices of such persons. How come the avoidance of passages from the Sangham literature in the text books of Kerala? The mysterious loss of the first and tenth Pathu of the Pathittuppathu must be more vigorously investigated. Each of the place names in the Palayur area f.i., such as Chowghat (Shapakkadu), Orumanayoor, Puthumanassery, Arthat, Chemmanur carry some historical significance and as such ought to be scrutinized by the student of Kerala history. Cf. G. Menachery, Aashamsa, in Chemmannur Kudumba Charithram by Major Cherunny, Guruvayur, 1999. The many efforts to throw light on Kerala historical problems from an investigation of local history and folklore must be enthusiastically encouraged. See “Introduction,” G. Menachery, in George Emmatty, “Kuttikalkku Kerala Charithram,” 2003, H & C Publishing House, Thrissur.

Malankara Marthoma Syrian Church on Pattanam Excavations and St’ Thomas

Malankara Mar Thoma Syrian Church

  http://www.kuwaitmarthoma.org.accession/ Date and Time 17-10-2011; 4.30PM

The Malankara Mar Thoma Syrian Church (official name Malankara Mar Thoma Suryani Sabha) also known as the Mar Thoma Church is aChristian denomination based in Kerala, the south-western state of India. One of the Saint Thomas Christian churches tracing its origins to the missionary activity of Thomas the Apostle, the Mar Thoma Church defines itself as “Apostolic in origin, Universal in nature, Biblical in faith, Evangelical in principle, Ecumenical in outlook, Oriental in worship, Democratic in function, and Episcopal in character.”[2]. It is independent and indigenous. Its regular work as well as special projects are almost entirely financed by contributions from its members at home and abroad. It is currently in communion with the Anglican Communion and the Malabar Independent Syrian Church.
The Malankara Mar Thoma Syrian Church sees itself as continuing the apostolic succession and traditions first introduced by Apostle Thomas. Its direct origins lie in the activities of Anglican missionaries in the 18th and 19th centuries among the Malankara Church, the Syriac Orthodox church that emerged out of the first split in the Saint Thomas community in the 17th century. Particularly influential was the introduction of the first Malayam-language version of the Bible. The Mar Thoma Church became officially independent of the Malankara Church and its hierarchy after a court case in the late 19th century (seminary case: 1879-1889)
Until the beginning of twentieth century Marthomites lived in a few districts of Central Travancore and Kunnamkulam of the southern Indian state ofKerala. But it has spread with the 20th-century Indian diaspora to North AmericaEurope, the Middle EastMalaysiaSingaporeSouth Africa,Australia and New Zealand, and currently has around one million members worldwide [1]. Their mother tongue is Malayalam the language of Kerala.

DEFINITIONS

Mar Thoma Church. Malankara Mar Thoma Suryani Sabha (Malankara Mar Thoma Syrian Church) is the official name of the Church. Succinct name in Malayalam is Marthoma Sabha and in English, Mar Thoma Church.
Mar Thoma or Marthoma is Aramaic, means Saint Thomas. Members of this church are often referred to as Marthomites.
Malankara is cognate of this name Maliankara, a place near Muziris, where Thomas the Apostle first landed in Kerala. It was the headquarters of the Church from the first century.
Syrian Church. The original liturgical language used in Malankara Church was Aramaic and Hebrew. Later this was replaced by Syriac. In 1900 when the Church accepted a new name Malanakara Mar Thoma Suryani Sabha, it included the word Suryani also in it. This does not mean that the Mar Thoma Christians were Syrians (people who came from Syria) or the Church was under any Syrian Church. Malankara Mar Thoma Syrian Church was never ruled by any other Churches.

ADMINISTRATION

Malankara Mar Thoma Syrian Church has a well defined constitution and has a democratic pattern of administration. There is an ‘Episcopal Synod’, a Grand Assembly known as ‘Marthoma Suryani Sabha Prathinidhi Mandalam’ (House of Representatives), a council to aid the Metropolitan in administrative matters and a Vaideeka Selection Committee, to select candidates for the ministry of the Church.
Each diocese has its own council and an assembly. The assembly members are elected by the individual parishes, and the council members, by the Assembly.
All members of a parish are members of Edavaka Sangham (General Body) and they also have the right to elect their representatives to the Diocesan Assembly and Prathinidhi Mandalam, (Church Parliament).
The title of the head of the Church is “Marthoma” and is addressed as “Marthoma Metropolitan”. He is installed from among the duly consecrated bishops (episcopas) of the Church, the choice being ordinarily that of the senior most among them. The present “Marthoma Metropolitan” is the Most Reverend Dr. Joseph Mar Thoma who resides at Poolatheen at Church Headquarters in TiruvallaKerala.
If the Metropolitan is personally satisfied that he has difficulty to continue to perform the duties appertaining to his office, he may, relinquish the powers and responsibilities as the Metropolian. Then he becomes the Senior Mar Thoma Metropolitan and is addressed as “Mar Thoma Valiya Metropolitan”. The present “Marthoma Valiya Metropolitan” is the Most Reverend Dr. Philipose Mar ChrysostomValiya Metropolitan.
To assist the Metropolitan there are episcopas, the senior most among them is called Suffragan Metropolitan. The present members of the Episcopal Synod are:
§                     The Most Rev.Dr. Philipose Mar Chrysostom Valiya Metropolitan.
§                     The Most Rev. Dr. Joseph Mar Thoma Metropolitan
§                     The Rt. Rev. Dr. Zacharias Mar Theophilus Suffragan Metropolitan.
§                     The Rt. Rev. Geevarghese Mar Athanasius Episcopa.
§                     The Rt. Rev. Dr. Geevarhese Mar Theodosius Episcopa.
§                     The Rt. Rev. Dr. Euyakim Mar Coorilos Episcopa.
§                     The Rt. Rev. Joseph Mar Barnabas Episcopa.
§                     The Rt. Rev. Thomas Mar Timotheos Episcopa.
§                     The Rt. Rev. Dr. Isaac Mar Philoxenos Episcopa.
§                     The Rt. Rev. Dr. Abraham Mar Paulos Episcopa.

Clergy – ministers

‘’Semmasan’’ (Deacons): The Sabha Prathinidhi Mandalam elects a Vaideeka Selection board to select candidates for the ministry of the Church.
‘’Kassessa’’ (Clergy): Persons receiving ordination as ministers shall be duly ordained deacons. They all have had their theological training at the Mar Thoma Theological Seminary, KottayamKerala.
Vicars general: From among the clergy who have completed 25 years of service in the ordained ministry and not less than sixty years of age are selected and ordained as vicars general. In the absence of the diocesan bishop, they may be appointed as head of the diocese.

Administrative divisions

For administrative purpose, the Malankara Mar Thoma Syrian Church is divided into 12 dioceses w.e.f.January 1, 2010, headed by a Metropolitan or by an Episcopa. They are:
§                     Diocese of Adoor
§                     Diocese of Malaysia-Australia-Singapore
§                     Diocese of Chengannur-Mavelikara
§                     Diocese of Niranam-Maramon
§                     Diocese of Ranny-Nilackel.
§                     Diocese of Thiruvananthapuram-Kollam
§                     Diocese of KottayamKochi
§                     Diocese of ChennaiBangalore
§                     Diocese of KunnamkulamMalabar
§                     Diocese of Delhi
§                     Diocese of Mumbai
§                     Diocese of North America-Europe.

HISTORY

First century BC

Muziris, near the tip of India, in the Peutinger Table.
On the south western side of the Indian peninsula; between the mountains and the Erythraean Sea (now Arabian Sea); stretching from Kannoor to Kanyakumari was the land called Cherarajyam, which was ruled by local chieftains. Later this land came to be known as Malabar and (now Kerala). Muziris(now known as Pattanam near Cochin) was the important entry port. After the discovery of Hippalus, every year 100 ships arrived here from various parts of the then known world, including Red Sea ports [6].Kodungallur:Cradle of Christianity in India. By Prof. George Menachery Mar Thoma Shrine, Azhikode, 1987, 2000. passim. </ref>.
During the time of Moses and King Solomon, the Malabar coast traded spices and luxury articles with Israel.[7] Excavations carried out at Pattanam from 2005 provided evidence that the maritime trade between Kerala and the Mediterranean ports existed even before 500 BC or earlier [8]. It is possible that some of those traders who arrived from the west, including Jews, remained in Kerala.[9]
While Augustus Caesar (31 BC- 14 AD) was the Emperor of Rome and Herod the Great (37-4 BC) was King of Judea, ambassadors from Malabar visited the Emperor Augustus.[10]. Nasranis believe that these ambassadors were The Wise Men From the East, of the Bible.[11] People who believe they are descendants of these Wise Men gather every year in Kerala.[12] In the first century map Tabula Peutingeriana (see the map) a temple of Augustus is clearly visible near Muziris showing the close relation between Rome and Malabar in the first century BC.

Arrival of Saint Thomas

Saint Thomas Christians believe that Thomas the Apostle arrived in Kerala around AD 52. He landed at Muziris (now known as Pattanam, near Cochin on the Malabar Coast). The Jews and a few of the Wise Men, who had been to Bethlehem to worship Jesus[13] listened to his preaching and became followers of Jesus of Nazareth.[14]. It is believed that after leaving Malankara, St. Thomas proceeded to the East coast of India and died a martyrs’ death at a place called Mylapore in Tamil Nadu.

In Track With Pattanam Excavations The Book Published by Syro-Malabar Church has Articles by Left Historians In Pattanam Excavavation Panel of Muziris Heritage Project

 http://nasrani.net/2008/07/26/st-thomas-christians-and-nambudiris-jews-and-sangam-literature-a-historical-appraisal-bosco-puthur-editor/
Accession Date and Time-15-10-2011; 12.15PMINTRODUCTION
The present volume is the result of a modest venture of the Liturgical Research Centre of the Syro-Malabar Church to study the history of St. Thomas Christians, especially against the background of the early history of the Nambudiri Brahmins and Jews in Kerala (Malabar) and the famous literary work, the Sangam Literature. The study is a sincere attempt to search the roots of this unique Christian community in order to better understand it’s identity and to situate it with more relevance in the present day world.
bosco puthoor St. Thomas Christians and Nambudiris, Jews and Sangam Literature – A Historical Appraisal’, Bosco Puthur (Editor)
The book contains the research papers, responses and observations presented in the three seminars on historical questions conducted by the Liturgical Research Centre and published in a very orderly manner which makes it one of the ideal books on many different subjects concerning Thomasine Christian history during various periods and that which can be easily understood by a lay person. Though there are many different topics by various renowned authors and experts, the main thrust of the book is to unravel the early history of the St. Thomas Christian community, by juxtaposing them all, which gives a clearer picture of the community’s early history.
The contents of the volume are interesting, thought-provoking and even challenging, with an unbiased approach towards history alongwith many reliable references provided, as one sees in the volume, hence, the reliability of the work is also assured.
CONTENTS
St. Thomas Christians: A Historical Analysis of their Origin and Development up to 9th Century AD – Pius Malekandathil.

St. Thomas Christians: A Historical Analysis of their Origin and Development up to 9th Century AD – Dr. Pius Malekandathil : A Response – A. Mathias Mundadan CMI.
St. Thomas Christians in Malabar from the 9th to the 16th Centuries – K. S. Mathew.
Response to Dr. K. S. Mathew’s Paper : St. Thomas Christians in Malabar from the 9th to the 16th Centuries – Joseph Kolengadan (Nityasatyananda).
Nambudiris : Migrations and Early Settlements in Kerala – M. G. S. Narayanan.
History/Story : No Last Words : A Response – Scaria Zacharia
St. Thomas Christians and Nambudiri Brahmins : A Note – Rajan Gurukkal
The Nambudiri Community : A History – Kesavan Veluthat
The Jews in Kerala – P. M. Jussay
The Jews in Kerala : A Response – Samuel H. Hallegua
The Jews in Kerala : A Response – A. Mathias Mundadan CMI
Sangam Literature and its Relevance – SIRPI Balasubramaniam
Sangam Literature and Christian Elements – R. Balachandran
Sangam Literature and Christianity : A Response – P. K. George SJ
Early Tamil Oral, Literary and Architectural Traditions and St. Thomas Christians – K. Sadasivan
Observations:
• St. Thomas Christians and Nambudiris in Kerala – Cherian Varicatt & James Puliurumpil
• Brahmins, Jews and Thomas Christians – Francis Kanichikattil CMI
• Tradition : Myth or Truth ? – John Kudiyiruppil MST
• Christianity is truly indigenous – John Palakunnel
• Validity of St. Thomas Tradition – K. A. Antony
• Historicity of St. Thomas Tradition – Sebastian Thayil
The contributors are some of the most renowned experts in history and literature and their professional profile is enlisted below as provided in the volume.
CONTRIBUTORS
Pius MALEKANDATHIL is the reader in the Department of History of Goa University.
A. Mathias MUNDADAN CMI is professor emeritus of Church History of Dharmaram Vidya Kshetram, Bangalore.
K. S. MATHEW is former Head of the Department of History of Pondicherry University.
Joseph KOLENGADAN (Nityasatyananda) is former professor of English at St. Thomas College, Thrissur and the Head of the Department of English at St. Joseph’s College, Tiruchirapalli.
M. G. S. NARAYANAN is former Head of the Department of History at Calicut University and present Chairman of Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR), New Delhi.
Scaria ZACHARIA is professor in the Department of Malayalam / School of Cultural Studies of Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit, Kalady.
Rajan GURUKKAL is the head of the School of Social Sciences of Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam.
Kesavan VELUTHAT is reader in the Department of History of Mangalore University.
P. M. JUSSAY is former professor of St. Joseph’s college Tiruchirapalli and Annamalai University, Head of the Department of Humanities of the Regional Engineering College, Calicut and former Editor of ‘Kerala Times’, Ernakulam.
Samuel H. HALLEGUA is the most prominent member of the Jewish community of Mattancherry, Kochi.
SIRPI BALASUBRAMANIAM is former Head of the Department of Tamil of Bharathiar University, Coimbatore.
R. BALACHANDRAN is professor in the Department of English of Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli.
P. K. GEORGE SJ holds Doctorate in Tamil for comparative study of Latin and Sangam Literature and was for sometime lecturer of Tamil in St. Xavier’s College, Palayamkottai.
K. SADASIVAN is Head of the Department of History of Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli.

George Menacherry Secretary of Church History Association of India (CHAI) Confirms Pattanam as Muziris on Evidence Given By P.J.Cherian

http://nasrani.net/2007/02/21/book-review-glimpses-of-nazraney-heritage-by-prof-george-menachery/
Accession date and time 14-10-2011; 12.10 PM
Glimpses of Nazraney Heritage’ by Prof George MenacheryAuthored by  on Wednesday, February 21, 2007 20:48 - 27 Comments

Notes about the Author
nazraney heritage nsc Glimpses of Nazraney Heritage by Prof George Menachery
Prof. George Menachery is a freelance Indian Journalist and Editor of the St. Thomas Christian Encyclopedia of India and the Indian Church History Classics. Glimpses of Nazraney Heritage
This is a book on essays on Nazraney culture and heritage. Many of the Menachery’s articles which are quite very famous are part of this book. This well written essays covers the 2000 years old history, tradition and heritage makes an excellent reading. It is highly relevant in today’s nuclear family set up of Syrian Christians where many kids are not fortunate to learn about the tradition from Grand parents.

A recent instance is the discovery of a large selection of artefacts such as a Chera coin with elephant, ankusha, bow & arrow of the 1st. century CE, a portion of an amphora, shards of pottery, bricks used in construction, ringwells, beads, rouletted ware, b&w ware… all from the early historical layer during excavations conducted by Dr. Shajan and Dr. Selvakumar at Pattanam near Parur on the south bank of the present Periyar river, a few miles to the south of Kodungallur. Roberta Tomber of the University of Southamton,  Dr. P.J.Cherian and many others believe that this was the site of the ancient Muziris of the first century Greek and Roman writers. Cf. their papers presented at the seminar conducted by the Kerala Historical Research Society, Sahitya Academy, Trichur.

Church History Association of India Congratulates Pattanam Excavators

http://www.unrv.com/forum/index.php?act=ST&f=4&t=127
Accession date and time  14-10-2011; 11.45 AMProf. George Menachery  Secretary of Church History Association of India  (CHAI)Applauds Pattanam Excavators

Posted 15 July 2004 – 06:15 PM
Prof. George Menachery from India wrote on July 16. 2004, 00:00:
E-mail: kunjethy@yahoo.com
URL: http://www.indianchristianity.com

Glad to see that the digs made by Dr. Shajan and Selvakumar (CHS) at Pattanam or Pathanam or Pazhnam shedding evidence though tentatively on the ancient Muziris is being widely noticed by scholars all over the world. Here one might say that even in the 16th – 17th centuries Pattanam was considered to be the ancient Muziris. This is mentioned in George Menachery, Kodungallur City of St. Thomas, 1987, and in its reprint , 2000. For exhaustive details concerning the views of ancients and moderns – both Indians and non-Indians, including Greeks, Romans,….Sangham poets, modern historians… see Chapters I and II of the book mentioned. Earlier many had asked for excavations in and around Cranganore, Mahodayapuram, Kodungallur, Mahadevarpattanam, Thiruvanchikkulam, Cheraman Paraambu etc. Anujan Achan had many decades back made some enlightened guesses and insisted on excavations. But the governments and the universities and archaeology depts. were reluctant to go forward with scientific excavations for one reason or other. We are all glad that Shajan, Selvakumar, and Gopi & co have made a beginning – and what a beginning. Congratulations!
For those who want to learn more about the history of Muziris, Muchiri, Kodungallur, Paravur, and Pattanam given below are two website pages:
http://www.indianchr…/html/Books.htm
http://www.thinkers….odungallur.html

Why P.J.Cherian Chose Dr. Derek Kennet for Pattanam Excavations?–Derek Kennet and Biblical Archaeology

 http://www.thenational.ae/news/worldwide/middle-east/biblical-marshland-breathes-new-life

Accession  Date and  Time -13-10-2011; 3.05 PM

Biblical marshland breathes new life

Sep 18, 2008
A Marsh Arab paddles a boat loaded with reeds he gathered in the historic swamplands.

UNITED NATIONS // Despite links to the Bible, the Epic of Gilgamesh and Sir Wilfred Thesiger, the British explorer, years of damage and neglect reduced the once-verdant marshlands of southern Iraq to a crusty wasteland. A combination of Saddam Hussein’s punitive policies and dams upstream of the Tigris and Euphrates delta pushed the swampy home of the famed Marsh Arabs into rapid decline.
But this month, UN environment chiefs said conservation work was proving successful and announced plans to gain the rejuvenated wetlands an inscription on the famed World Heritage List of the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (Unesco). Derek Kennet, an archaeologist from Durham University, said academics were attracted to the swamplands’ unusual ecosystems and societies as well as their associations with folklore, myth and literature.
“It’s an important area, but also a problematic area because of the flooding,” Mr Kennet said. “It offers such a unique environment in the Near East that I would think that Unesco is likely to approve it. “Because of the way the Bible was written, the area has been linked with the story of Gilgamesh, the flood myth and the story of the Garden of Eden. But, of course, that is just speculation.” Southern Mesopotamia’s interconnected marshlands and lakes are home to a predominantly Shiite population, the Ma’dan, whose way of life was preserved through relative isolation for 5,000 years.
The explorer Thesiger chronicled the lives of swamp-dwelling tribes in his 1964 classic The Marsh Arabs, having spent months living with remote communities during the 1950s. At that time, an estimated 400,000 people eked out subsistence livings among muddy waterways and islets, building delicately arched dwellings from marsh reeds and dining on fish and water buffalo. Archaeologists and literature buffs have theorised about references to the Marsh Arabs, heirs to the heritage of two great Fertile Crescent civilisations – the Babylonians and Sumerians – in ancient texts.

Some claim that the river basin was the Garden of Eden described in the Book of Genesis. Others argue that the area’s rising and falling water levels were translated into the deluge myth that appears in the Noah’s Ark story and the Epic of Gilgamesh. Until the 1970s, the marshlands at the foot of the Tigris and Euphrates covered an area of 20,000 sq km during heavy rains, but dam building in Syria and Turkey began to take their toll on river flows.
The process was accelerated under Saddam’s rule following the 1980-88 war with Iran, when his government built dams and canals to starve the wetlands of water during a spate of punitive policies against Shiites. By 2002, the permanent wetlands had dwindled to an area of only 760km, and as many as 300,000 Marsh Arabs were forced to leave their homes and head for camps in Iraq and abroad. “Because of what Saddam Hussein did, the marshlands were in danger of completely disappearing, as was the centuries-old culture of the Marsh Arabs,” said Narmin Othman, Iraq’s environment minister. “It had become an ecological but also a human tragedy.”After the toppling of Saddam in April 2003, surviving residents began breaking the embankments and opening the floodgates to allow water back into the marshlands. The following year, UN Environment Programme (Unep) workers began planting reed banks, installing solar panels and providing drinking water systems for 22,000 people as part of a wetland restoration plan. The most recent satellite images show that the four-year project, costing US$14 million (Dh51.4m), has restored about 58 per cent of the marshlands.
Thanks to a recent funding pledge from Italy, Unep officials announced this month that Iraqi conservationists will turn the wetlands into a national park and apply for a place on the list of World Heritage Sites. The application will boast of the marshlands’ cultural and natural importance, being home to a unique population as well as a spawning ground for Gulf fisheries and a variety of birds, including the ibis. Officials plan to apply in 2010 and hope the bid will be accepted the following year.
Iraq already has three sites on the heritage list following the inscription of Samarra – an important Islamic city from the Abbasid Empire that boasts distinctive spiralling minarets – in June last year. The country’s other sites are the cities of Ashur and Hatra.jreinl@thenational.ae

Why P.J.Cherian chose Dr. Derek Kennet for Pattanam ?

 Nabateans were occupants of territory east and southwest of the Dead Sea. They were important in the  inter testamental and New Testamental Periods. These  ethnic communities in Biblical literature have been linked  with Pattanam by P.J.Cherian. Now Cherian has picked up Dr. Derek Kennet for archaeological studies on Pattanam  Why?

 The British Museum conducted a seminar on NABATEANS on 28-30 July 2011 in which Dr. Derek Kennet  was in the steering Committee

The Nabataeans in focusOrganizer: Dr Lucy Wadeson (University of Oxford)
The last few years have seen a significant intensification of archaeological activity in the environs of Petra. New projects, such as in Wadi Farasa, the Outer Siq, Umm el Biyara, and the various necropoleis and cultic areas of the surrounding mountains are particularly important in enhancing knowledge of the social, religious and funerary activities of the Nabataeans and their relation to the topography of the city, its urban core and how it functioned. This session aims to bring together key projects in order to gain a new understanding of how different areas of the city functioned, how they relate to one another and what original ideas they reveal about Nabataean culture, society and the urban development of Petra. The key questions that the session will tackle include: How did Petra’s natural environment influence the Nabataean architectural and sculptural style, urban planning, carving and construction techniques, and more social factors such as religious rituals and burial practices? How should we define the Nabataean cultural identity, which is only now being appreciated as something distinct from better-known surrounding cultures in the region? How do aspects of Petra’s urban, religious and funerary landscape relate to other cities and settlements in the territory of the Nabataeans and wider region? The latter question will engage with the topic of the Special Lecture that is to be delivered by Dr Laila Nehmé at the conference. In addition, this session will act as a platform to promote discussion of the various methodological approaches taken in archaeological projects related to the Nabataeans in the face of limited literary sources and debates over chronology. This will raise important questions concerning the direction in which future archaeological activity at Petra should be going

MBI Al Jaber Foundation Public Lecture

‘From the capital of Petra to the provincial city of Hegra: new insights on the Nabataeans’

Steering & Editorial Committee of the Seminar for Arabian Studies

Dr Robert Carter (Chair), Dr Ardle Mac Mahon (Secretary), Andrew Thompson (Treasurer), Janet Starkey (Editor-in-Chief of the Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies), Professor Khaleel Al-Muaikel, Professor Alessandra Avanzini, Dr Mark Beech, Dr Nadia Durrani, Dr Ricardo Eichmann, Professor Clive Holes, Dr Robert G. Hoyland, Dr Derek Kennet, Michael C.A. Macdonald, Dr Venetia Porter, Professor Dan Potts, Professor Christian Robin, Dr St. John Simpson, Professor Janet Watson & Dr Lloyd Weeks.

Why P.J.Cherian Imports Experts From British Museum For Pattanam Excavations?

http://biblicalarcheology.net/?p=229. Accession Date and Time-12-10-2011;12.05 PM

Biblical Archaeology in the British Museum

The British Museum has recently opened a permanent exhibition of Biblical archaeology where items from the Lebanon and Palestine are displayed. The new display forms an extension to the gallery where Hittite and Mesopotamian finds are on show.
Some of the items are new to the museum and most come from three sites in Jordan: Tel es-Sa’idiyeh andTiwal esh-Sharqi in the Jordan Valley and ‘Ain Ghazal near Amman. British Museum staff are actively excavating at all three sites.
Tel es-Sa’idiyeh is an Early Bronze Age farming settlement destroyed by fire. Archaeological evidence indicates that this happened in the summer time. The display shows the pottery, food in the storage jars and even the state of the washing-up being done for the eleven people who lived there at the time of the fire. Evidence indicates that the inhabitants were semi-nomadic.
Rome 57 contains eight glass cases and several free-standing exhibits, arranged in chronological order down to the Babylonian conquest. Among the objects are some of the Lachish letters, some of the Tel el-Amarna tablets and the Shebna inscription.
The Shebna inscription was taken from a tomb in the Kedron Valley in Jerusalem. Shebna was the scribe who negotiated with the Assyrians who were besieging Jerusalem (2 Kings 18:18). He prepared an elaborate tomb for himself, which prompted the prophet Isaiah to write,
“To Shebna, who is over the house, and say, ‘What have you here and whom have you here, as he who hews himself a sepulchre on high, who carves a tomb for himself in a rock’?” Isaiah 22:15-18
The inscription, in archaic Hebrew, cut into a sunken panel above the door into his tomb, identifies Shebna as the Royal Steward (“who is over the house”) and says, “There is no silver and no gold here but [his bones] and the bones of his slave-wife with him. Cursed will be the man who will open this [tomb].”
Room 58 contains the finds from Tel se-Sa’idiyeh and a reconstruction of tomb P19 from Jericho, discovered by Kathleen Kenyon. The many objects which filled the tomb are well displayed, including even a plastic spide crawling across one of the skeletons. (The plastic is not original, but the spider is!) Kenyon concluded that the objects in the tomb were so well preserved because the cave had filled with poisonous gases such as methane and carbon dioxide and killed living objects in the tomb, including white ants and bacteria.
Room 59 has two cases with objects related to the Levant: one shows Neolithic pottery while the oter shows the one-third life-size human figures discovered at ‘Ain Ghazal. They are the “straw men” previously reported in Diggings. They are made of straw covered with lime and clay plaster. Some of them have six fingers.
It must be remembered that the British Museum only holds items that have been gifted to it or from digs they have funded themselves. As such it can only portray a small part of the available evidence in the field of Biblical archaeology. However one might have hoped for a greater level of interpretation, cross-indexing and explanatory diagrams to better inform the less academic visitor of the importance of what is on view.
Available from the museum bookshop is a guide book called The Bible in the British Museum: Interpreting the Evidence (ISBN 0-7141-1698-X British Museum Press, first published 1988, reprinted with corrections 1996 and 1998) by T. C. Mitchell, former Keeper of the Western Asiatic Antiquities. This book covers 60 artifacts, of which 51 are in the British Museum and five in the British Library at King’s Cross, London. It contains photographs of each object, Biblical references, descriptions and translations where appropriate. At £10, it is an excellent guide for a visitor interested in the Biblical exhibits and a useful reference work for those who can’t visit in person

Excavating St’ Thomas at Pattanam and Recording St’ Thomas in Archives-Family Histories With St’ Thomas History Started Accumulating in KCHR Archives When Pattanam Excavations Was in its Primary Stage—-http://www.keralahistory.ac.in/family.htm.12-11-2011;10.45 AM



No
Name of Book
Author / Editor

Year

1. Kanakkalil Kudumba Charithram Kudumbacharitra Committee 2000
2 Moolepattu Kolannoor Kudumbacharithram (5 copies) K.V.Tharu 1995
3
Vattakunnel Kudumbacharitram
Baselious MarThomas Mathews Prathaman Bava 1993
4 Malankara Sabhayum Vattakkattu Valanadiyil Kudumbavum Mathai Nediyanikuzhi 2001
5 Sankarapuri Tharavadu Adangapurathu Kudumbam
(6 copies)
K.J.Thomas 2001
6 Mateplackal Kudumbam George Mattaplackal 1999
7 Payyampilly Koluvan George Payyampilly 2000
8 Kerala Christyanikalude Charitravum Kurakaran Valiyaveetil Kudumbavum (2 copies) Prof. John Kurakar 1993
9 Sankaramangalam Kudumbacharitram
P.S.Jacob
2001
10 Periyappurathu Mathan Vaidyan Varghese Kanjirathunkal 1983
11 Chennakkat Kudumba Charitram Kudumbacharitra Committee 1984
12 Maramon Palakunnathu Kudumbacharitram Prof. Anian Alex Thomas 1996
13 Venmony Maruthummootil KudumbaCharitram & Quarterly Magazines Kudumba Committee 1998
14 Koyikkara Vadakkan Kudumba Charitram Mathew Koyikara 2002
15 Chollamadom KudumbaCharitram Kudumba Committee 1993
16 Kudumba Charitram- Pallivathukkal P.J. Ommen Pezhumkattil 2003
17 Puthuveedu KudumbaCharitram (unpublished) Robinson 1999
18

19

Thottumadathil Kudumba Charitram

(2 copies) Anubandham-2

T.N.Venkiteswara Pai,, 2001
2001
2003
20 Pulickal Kudumbam Utbhavavum Charitravum P.T. Poulose 2000
21 NedumthaliSwaroopam Athava Paravoor Rajakudumbam (6 copies) Prof. Varghese Nedumthallil 1949
22 Kuruvunakunnel Family Editorial Board 2000
23 Palakunnathu Family P.M.George
24 Pulickal(Pulickan) Family Directory Family Association 2001
25
Kollamparampil Kudumbayogam
K.S.Kuriakose 2001
26 Mallikudumba Charitram Kudumba Committee 1976
27 Oru Vamshavum Pala Nadukalum
Kurukkoor Palathunkal Kudumbacharitram
( 7 copies)
Rev Fr. Dr. George Kurakkar 2002
28 Madathunjalil Kudumbacharitram Fr.A.Adappen SJ 1992
29 Thattayil Idayirethu Kudumbayogam Smaranika Kudumba Committee 1996
30 Thuruthiyil Kudumbacharitram Prof T.M.Pailey 1997
31 Adukuzhiyil Kudumba Charitram
( 2 copies)
Thomas A.E 2002
32 Thumbamon Puthenpurackal Kudumbacharitram Mathai Kathaman Mathew
33 Kadackal Kudumbacharitram K.I.Abraham
34 Edooraya Marungodil Kudumbacharitram ( 2 copies) Marungodil Kudumba Committeee 1993
35 Edathumpadickal Family History Ittiyaveera Kurian 1985
36 History of the branch of the Adangapurathu Family A.M.Mathai & A.M. Eappen 1999
37 Plathottam Kudumbacharitram T.M.Mathew 1990
38 Maritickal Kudumbacharitram M.B.Ibrahim 1986
39 Ayiroor Pakalomattom Thazhamon Kudumbacharitram Kudumba Committee 1926
40 Pala Kattakkayam Kudumba Charitram (2 copies)
Mathew Kattakkayam
2000
41 Kodukulanji Thazhamuttathu Kudumbacharitram Acamma Itty Ipe 1999
42 Ambat Tharawad & Allied Families A.S.R.Menon 2000
43 Pazhoor Karuthedathu
( 2 copies)
Kudumba Committee 2002
44 Kowngotethu Kudumbacharitram
( 2 copies)
C.K.Kochukoshy 1994
45 Tharishuthala Kudumba Diary K.Karunakaran Nair 2001
46 Kalangaraparambil Kudumbacharitram Kudumba Committee 2002
47 Theruvil Kudumbayogam Smaranika Binu K. John 1998
48 Poovarani Pazheparambil Kudumbacharitram P.J. Sebastian 2002
49

50

Meckamalil Kudumba Yogam
I Edition
II  ,,
Kudumba Committee
,,
1969
1998
51 Angamali Charitravum Thachil Kudumbavum
( 9 copies)
Dr. J. Joseph 1996
52 Pullipadavil Kudumbam P.V.Kurian 1986
53 Chalumattu Kudumbacharitram C.J.Easow 1999
54 Mannekkattil Kudumbacharitram Kudumba Committee 1989
55 Chembadassery Kudumbacharitram Fr. Neeloos 1992
56 Thekkepevarathala Kudumbayogam Directory Kudumba Committee 2003
57 Vellamparambathu Panikkasseri Kudumbapuranam
( 5 copies)
V.P.Sugathan 2002
58 Kerala Nasrani Charitravum Parayathukkattil
Kudumbavum
P.G.George 1995
59 Pavamani- The Family Tree Souvenir Trust 2002
60 Pavamani Supplement Souvenir 1999
61 Pavamani Supplement Souvenir 2000
62 Pavamani Supplement Souvenir 2001
63 Mukkathu Kudumba Charitram Kudumba Committee 1955
64 Mukkathu II Edition 1972
65 Mukkattu Kudumba Charitram 2001
66 Kathedom Kudumba Samuchaya Charitram Kudumba Committee 2002
67 Kollamana, Kalloor Madhathil Pazhangeril Manethumali Kanekkadu Kudumbam Kudumba Committee 2001
68 Ponvanibham Kudumba Charitram Kudumba Committee 1999
69 Cholapallil Kudumba Charitram  & Directory Kudumba Committee 1986
70 Pulikunnel Kudumbam Joseph Pulikunnel 2000
71 Ala Velutheril Kudumba Charitram Kudumba Committee 2003
72 Kulathackal Kudumba Committee 1974
73 Muhamma Yogyaveedu Kudumbacharitram AD 52- 2002 Chacko Jose 2002
74 Biography of the Pananthanathu Family T C Mohanan Pillai (unpublished)
75 Thettayil Kadicheeni Kudumba Charitram Joseph K.C 1989
76 Olickal Kudumba Charitram T.K.Ramakrishnan 2001
77 Poovathoor Chenamkuzhiyil Kudumbayogam T.K.Ramakrishnan 2002
78

79

Kallada Malayil Kudumbam

The Palakunnathu Family

Kadhisha Suriyani Palli, Kollam
P.M.George
80 Maramon Kolathu Kudumba Charitram Kudumbayogam Committee 1992
81 Chenatt Kudumbam
( 2 copies)
Tharapparambil Narayana Pillai 2002
82 Palakunnel Kudumbavum Kerala Christavarum ( 2 copies) Kudumbayogam Committee 1983
83 Maliyekkalaya Kaithayil Padinjarekootu Kudumba Charitram Kudumba Committee 1986
84 The Baker Family in India Eira  Dalton 1963
85 Kandathil Kudumbam Kudumba Charitra Committee 1974
86 Vendarappillil Kudumbacharitram Kudumba Charitra Committee 1999
87 The Palakunnathu Family N.M.Mathew 2003
88 Kuravilangad Marthamariyam Palliyum Kurakkaran Valiyaveettil Kudumbavum Kudumba Charitra Committee 1998
89 Kottarakarayude Samskarika Parambaryavum Kurakkaran Valiyaveettil Kudumbavum
( 2 copies)
Kudumba Charitra Committee 1999
90 Kudumbadeepam Trimasika-Kurakaran Kudumba Charitra Committee 1997
91 Kudumbadeepam Trimasika- Kurakaran Kudumba Charitra Committee 1994
92 Kudumbadeepam Trimasika- Kurakaran- 13,14,15,16,17&18 Kudumba Charitra Committee 2000-2001
93 Arayamparambil Tharawad Charitram Kudumba Committee (unpublished)
94 Perunthitta Madom (unpublished) B.Madhava Menon 2003
95 Pavothikkunnel –Palackamannil Kudumbacharitram –I Part Mathew Varghese 1985
96 Pavothikkunnel –Palackamannil Kudumbacharitram –II Part Mathew Varghese 1999
97 Kerala Christava Sabhayum Palackal Kudumbavum Dr.Thomas Palackal (unpublished)
98 Maniyasseril Enna Tharawad R. Krishna Pillai       ,,
99 Othalakkuzhiyil Kudumbacharitram A.C. Jose       ,,
100 The Pallivathukkal Family of Kanjirapally Thomas Abraham      ,,
101 Shaikinte Veedu Family Tree Kunjamma Koya
102 Vechoorathu Kudumbacharitram Dr. K. Balakrishna Pillai        ,,
103 Ravuthurmarude 300 Varsham
( 2 copies)
Salim P. Thazhethil   2002
104 Cherukad Kudumba Charitram Kudumbayogam Committee   2003
105 Kandaththil Kudumbacharitram
( 2 copies)
            ,,   1989
106 Kuttippuzha Kudumba Charitram Kudumbayogam Committee 2003
107 Pandalaanickal Kudumba Charitram K.I.George Pandalaanickal 2002
108 Poozhikalayil Kudumba Charitram Kudumbayogam Committee 1977
109 Poozhikalayil Kudumba Charitram- I Edition Kudumbayogam Committee 2003
110 Poozhikalayil Kudumba Charitram- II Edition Kudumbayogam Committee 2003
111 Ayiroor Thazhillam Kudumba Charitram Kudumbayogam Committee 1957
112 Maramon Pakalomattom Chakkaalayil Cherian Cherian 1958
113 Thazhamon Kudumbam Kudumbayogam Committee 1926
114 The Heritage
( 2 copies)
Varghese Joseph & M.G.Paul 2002
115 Elanjickal Kudumbavum Kudumbangangalum Prof. E. J. John 2003
F116 Velloor Kudumbam Kurian C. Velloor 1985
117 Thamarakkattu Kudumba Charithram Kudumbayogam Committee 2001
118 Kuzhichchaal Ponnampathu Kudumba Souvenir Kudumba Committee 2002
119 Thechcheril, Poothethu, Pullampallil Kudumbacharithram Committee 1992
120 Maramon Kolathu Kudumbacharithram ( 2 copies) Jiju Mathew P 1992
121 Kurudamannil Family K.C.Punnose 1998
122 Naalakom Tharawad – Kuttichira- Kozhikode 2002
123 Kaviyoor Kochiyil Kudumbacharitram Kudumba Committee 1995
124 The History of the Kaviyoor Kochiyil Family Editorial Committtee 1997
125 Velloor Kudumbam & Anubandham Kurian C. Velloor 1985
1999
126 Elanthoor Aypunnil Kudumbacharitram Kudumbayogam 1988
127 Kanianthara Kudumbam Dr. J. Alexander, K.J.Ninan, Prof. Joseph Alexander 1991
128 Kanianthara Kudumbam (Mal) Dr. J. Alexander, K.J.Ninan, Prof. Joseph Alexander 1991
129 Kanianthara Kudumbam Charitram J.Alexander 1111
130 Kanianthara Kudumbam Charitram K. J.Alexander, K.J.Ninan 1955
131 Neeliyathakathootu Kudumba Charitram Neeliyathakathootu Krishnan Nambiar 1998
132 Puthenparambil KudumbaCharitram Kudumba Committee 2000
133 Srambickal Kudumba Charitram Fr. George Srambickal 1998
134 Njarakula Thurackal Kallidukkil- Nidheeri T.B. John Thurackal 1996
135 Sankarapuri Kudumbam K.V.Chacko Kuzhikkattu 1982
136 Changanacherry Olassayil Kudumba Charitram Olasayil Kudumba Sanghadana 2003
137 Mayiladoor Kudumba Charithram Fr.Francis Mayiladoor 1999
138 Pythrikam Puthancode Kudumbayogam 2003
139 Smaranika C.R.C. Pothujanavayanasala Grandham, Kadanbasseri 2001
140 Kumpalanpoika muthal Kumpalanpoika vare The Kizhakethil Family 1995
141 Puravrithangalkidayil Oru Purushakesari Samuel Mana 1989
142 Avuthottu Kudumbham Shekharan Kutty 2004
143 Chayal Muthal Karakunnam Vare- Nedumchalil Chathankandam- Part I-(5 copies) Rev. Fr. Dr. George Kurukkur 2002
144 Chayal Muthal Karakunnam Vare- Nedumchalil Chathankandam- PartII-(5 copies) 2003
145 Nedumthallil Swaroopam Athava Paravur rajakudumbam Fr. James Varghese 2004
146 Kalluparapally Charithram Joseph Panikkar(Ed)-Alex Mathew 2004
147 Thottunkal Kudumba Charithram E.O. Abraham Elanjickal 2004
148 Chempakassary Kovilakathu
( 2 copies )
Baby Francis Chambakassary Unpublish-ed
149 Charithraveekshanavum Aarakkuzhayum George Mathew Kavalangad 2001
150 Paarathaazam Kudumbacharithram Kudumbayogam Committee 2003
151 Chiramel Kudumba Charithram Kudumbayogam Committee 1988
152 Family History of Kallath Kallath Kudumba Yogam 2004
153 Eluvathinkal Kaattokaran Tharavat Charitram Family Association 2002
154 Bhagavathivila N.Sasidharan Nair (Ed) 2002
155 Puthuchira Family History P.S Koshy (Sr) 2004
156 The Karakkal Kozhimannil Family Wing commander K. Varghese (Retd) 1994
157 Alappaat Palathinkal
Tharavat Charithram Part II
Committee 2003
158 Pakalomattom Thazhathedathu Mathayil Kudumbacharithram Kudumba Committee 2004
159 Kuruvikkattu Kudumba
Smaranika
V.S.Nair 1992
160 Thaadikkaran Kudumbam Edathiruthi
Valappad
T.A.Jose 2002
161 Kunnathedathu Kudumbacharithram Kudumba Committee 1988
162 Manikkombel Kudumbacharithram M.V. John Unpublished
163 Vellareth Kudumba Charithram George Thomas Villoth 1987
164 Irumala Kudumbacharithram Eldhose K Paul 2001
165 Kottokapally Puthumana Kudumba Charithram Kudumba Committee 2005
166 Erakoni Nagannoolil
Mannoor Kudumbacharithram
Kudumba Committee 2003
167 Thengum Palli Kudumbam Kudumba Committee 1991
168 Venmany Maruthummoottil Kudumba Charithram Committee 1998
169 Ayiroorkuzhiyil Kudumba Charithram Committee 2005
170 Thadikaaran Kudumbam Committee 2005

Child Traficking- Christian NGO – Mother Therasa Sisters of Charities links proved

20_11_2011_007_034.jpg guild of service

http://indianschristians.wordpress.com/2010/06/25/christian-child-business/

சன் - டிவியின் அரைத்த மாவை அரைக்கும் முறை 

Homosexual-Chistian-priest

pd01.jpg?w=450

http://devapriyaji.wordpress.com/2010/06/08/kerala-evangelist-booked-for-abusing-boys-in-orphanage/

pd15

Child Trafficking by Sisters of Mother Theresa

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2010

Chhattisgarh (AsiaNews)
Sept.12,2008
Link 

Nuns are accused of abducting and converting children, but they regain custody after accusations are shown to be false. Sangh Parivar, which accuses them of “child trafficking,” plans a demonstration against the nuns for tomorrow. Insecurity spreads to the state of Karnataka where three Pentecostal churches are shut down despite having all the right papers.


Police have imposed a gag order on the nuns from the Missionaries of Charity who were charged on 5 September with kidnapping and converting four infants. Radical Hindus are instead stepping up their campaign against the sisters whose convent is now under police protection.

“Police and Durgh (Chhattisgarh) district administration officials came to our convent, which is dedicated to Mother Teresa, and told us not to talk to anyone about the incident,” Sister Mamata said to local news. “An administration official explained that the order was for ‘our own good’ because Hindu militants are trying to mobilise public opinion against us and our missionary work.” The convent itself is under around the clock police protection. But “the administration official told to continue our work helping children and the marginalised,” she added.

Last 5 September, anniversary of Mother Teresa’s death, four sisters, including Sister Mamata were attacked by Bajrang Dal activists at the Durgh railway station (Chhattisgarh).

The Hindu radicals forced them to get off the train, handing them over to police after accusing them of abducting and converting the infants they had with them. The children were placed in a government-run hospital under police protection.

Subsequently the nuns filed a complaint with the police, presenting the children’s identity papers. After being thoroughly checked the papers were found to be valid and authentic, and the children were returned to the nuns.

Frustrated in the attempt to smear the nuns, Hindu radicals and the Sangh Parivar (an umbrella group that includes various Hindu nationalist and extremist groups) are now organising a protest against what they call “child trafficking by the sisters of Mother Teresa”.

Social activist Kiran Dan told reporters that the Sangh Parivar “has presented a memorandum to the district collector (administrator) calling for the nuns to be arrested and the inquiry re-opened.”

This episode comes amidst a new wave of violence against Christians, accused of forced conversions, that began in Orissa two weeks ago and has spread to other Indian states run by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

“Anti-Christian sentiments are spreading to Karnataka as well,” said Sajan K George, from the Bangalore-based Global Council of Indian Christians advocacy group. “Hindutva groups are going around threatening Christian communities with media reports about the destruction and fires inflicted upon their fellow Christians in Orissa, telling Christians that they too would meet the same fate and forcing them to stop their prayer meetings.

In Davangere (Karnataka) the threats were made good. Three Pentecostal churches were shut down for allegedly being “unauthorised”. The ministers in charge of the three places of worship have rejected the accusation, making public all the relevant papers, but so far to no avail; their churches are still closed.

Sajan K George noted that every Sunday Sangh Parivar extremists invade Christian places of worship, shouting anti-Christian slogans and beating up the faithful. By and large police just stand by watching, silent.

Talking about the incident in which she was involved, Sister Mamata said that “Mother Teresa worked tirelessly to bring God’s love to the poorest of the poor. We are but her daughters and all we want is to continue her work even if it means suffering. Indeed we are ready to pay the price for being disciples of Jesus.”

20_11_2011_001_027.jpg guild of service

Saint.Thomas fraud multiplies-Archaeology at Pattanam

National Archaeological Meet-Prof MGS Asks KCHR to Hand Over Pattanam to ASI—P.J.Cherian Vehemently Criticized by Leading Archaeologists

http://expressbuzz.com/cities/thiruvananthapuram/kchr-asked-to-hand-over-pattanam-excavation/333792.html

Last Updated : 16 Nov 2011 12:57:31 PM IST

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: M G S Narayanan, noted historian and Director General of the Centre for  Heritage Studies has called  upon the Kerala Council for Historical Research (KCHR) to hand over the excavation activity, being carried out at Pattanam, to the Archeological Survey of India (ASI).Presiding over the annual meet of the Archeologists held here the other day, he said that the KCHR had not been able to make considerable progress in the excavation so far. He said that the ASI, which is the representative body of the Archeologists in the country, had only the expertise to take up such a mammoth task and conduct it in a scientific manner.He expressed his displeasure over the KCHR’s decision to black out the media about the ‘meet’ fearing criticism from the archeologists across the country. The  organisers in the State had neither invited the media nor given the details to it. When KCHR chairman P J Cherian presented the paper on Pattanam excavation, it invited severe criticism from eminent archeologists.The ASI, Indian Society for Prehistoric and Quaternary Studies and the Indian History and cultural Society jointly organised the meet. ASI Additional Director General Dr B R Mony, former deputy additional director  general Dr K N Deekshith and Additional Chief Secretary K Jayakumar were present.  Noted archeologist A Sundaraiah was honoured at the function.

P.J.Cherian and Pattanam -The Integrity of excavations questioned by Indian Archaeologists at three day national conference at Thiruvananthapuram

At  Thiruvananthapuram , on 11th November 2011 Prof MGS Narayanan in his presidential address at the annual conference of the Indian Archaeological Society, Indian Society for Prehistoric and Quaternary Studies and Indian History and Culture Society  launched a scathing attack on Pattanam excavations and requested the Archaeological Survey of India to undertake the site.On 12th November 2011 eminent archaeologists questioned the integrity of Pattanam excavations. After P.J.Cherian presented his paper on Pattanam at the Indian Archaeological Society Session it was severely criticized. Prof A.Sundara leading archaeologist from Karnataka pointed out that there are no major structural remains at the site. He  asked P.J.Cherian  to precisely record and  classify antiquities from each trench  rather than pooling them together and interpreting them. Prof. Sundara told Cherian that such approaches are not adopted in field archaeology since  cultural material from each trench has its validity. Prof .Sundara also pointed out that the claims of structural remains from Pattanam is questionable. Dr. K.N.Dikshit former Joint Director General of Archaeological Survey of India and Secretary of Indian Archaeological Society questioned the claims of P.J.Cherian that Historical Period at Pattanam goes around 1000 BC. K.N. Dikshit asked Cherian to  be cautious and  review such claims since Historical Period in Peninsular India has not gone beyond 200-300BCOther archaeologists questioned Cherians claims of Pattanam as an urban site since nothing was seen in empty  trenches  when they visited Pattanam . To them Cherian told that he  has left the site and structures in the trenches were carried away by local people for which he is not responsible.When he was again asked to clear as to how residential areas, streets , warehouses and wharfs  can be carried away by people Cherian was silent and stood isolated.

Pattanam and P.J.Cherian: Prof. MGS Narayanan Launches Scathing Attack on Pattanam Ideology

Professor MGS Narayanan Former Chairman of ICHR and currently Director General of Centre For Heritage Studies, Thrippunithura, Kerala launched a scathing attack on Pattanam archaeological excavations and KCHR. He was delivering the Presidential address of the National Conference of three archaeological socities- The  Indian Archaeological Society,  Indian Society for Prehistoric and Quaternary Studies and Indian History and Culture Society  on 11th November 2011 at Mar Gregorious Renewal Centre, Nalanchira Thiruvananthapuram.. Professor MGS Narayanan urged the Archaeological Survey of India to take up Pattanam excavations.The entire archaeological community from all over India numbering 200 and represented by the three socities applauded the suggestions put forward by MGS. Narayanan.Dr. K.N.Dikshit, fSecretary of Indian Archaeological Society and former Deputy Director General of Archaeological Survey of India,  Dr. B.R.Mani, currently Additional Director General of the Archaeological Survey of India, Professor P.K.Thomas and Professor Pramod Joglekar of  Indian Society for Prehistoric and Quaternary Studies and Professor Vandana Kaushik and Professor Ashalatha Joshi of Indian History and Culture Society were present on the occasion

P.J.Cherian Dupes Press and Southern Naval Command.

 To Press P.J.Cherian States He Discovered the Oldest Pier in the World. To Southern Naval Command He is Silent on Pier and Wharf and States on  the Canoe at Pattanam.http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-268270437.html
Accession Date and Time 08-11-2011; 8.15 AM
KOCHI, Sept. 29 — The National Maritime Foundation (NMF) has honoured the Kerala Council for Historical Research (KCHR) with its excellence award.
KCHR Director P J Cherian received the award, consisting of a plaque and citation, from Vice-Admiral K N Sushil, flag officer Commanding-in-Chief of the Southern Naval Command, at a function organised at the Naval Base.P J Cherian said that Pattanam excavations have unearthed the oldest ever pier in the world. He sought the assistance of all in taking the Muziris Project forward and acknowledged the contributions of the Southern Naval Command in the underwater mapping of the area.http://indiannavy.nic.in/PRel_110928_MuzirisProjectAward.pdf
Accession Date and Time 08-11-2011; 8.15 AM
National Maritime Foundation (NMF) has awarded the Excellence Award to
the Kerala Council for Historical Research (KCHR). The award consisting of a plaque
and citation was accepted by Dr PJ Cherian, Director of KCHR from Vice Admiral KN
Sushil, Flag Officer Commanding in Chief Southern Naval Command at an
impressive ceremony at the Southern Naval Command Officers Mess late evening
yesterday.Dr PJ Cherian in his acceptance speech informed the audience that the
Pattanam canoe could be one of the oldest found in an archaeological context in
South Asia.

With Piracy Photos P.J.Cherian Argues Pattanam is Ancient Muziris

 http://www.basas.org.uk/groups/ports.htm

Accession Date and Time 08-11-2011; 8.00AM

RESEARCH GROUPS

PORTS AND INDIAN OCEAN EXCHANGES

Convenors: Dr R Tomber (British Museum, London, UK) & Prof PJ Cherian (Kerala Council for Historical Research, Trivandrum, India)
This international research group concentrates on Indian Ocean exchange of the Early Historic and Medieval periods, particularly seen through its ports, and the goods and ideas exchanged between them.
The convergence of textual and archaeological evidence during the Early Historic makes it and subsequent periods especially amenable to the study of exchange. Active archaeological research throughout the rim of the Indian Ocean is providing new finds and stimulating a growing interest in the subject. Informed speculation on the global nature of the economies of these periods can only now be attempted on the strength of this new information regarding the connections, exchanges and interaction among the different ethnic groups, trade sites and partners from different social and political systems.

Figure 1: Main ports of the Early Historic period (A. Simpson)

The group will use port sites as a springboard for investigating broader issues, initially concentrating on the site at Pattanam. A newly discovered, multi-period site excavated by the Kerala Council for Historical Research (KCHR), Pattanam has revealed diverse finds associated with Indian Ocean exchange including imports from Rome, West Asia and China. These finds, together with its urban character, argue for its equation with the famed ancient site of Muchiri or Muziris to the Romans.

Figure 2: Canoe excavated at Pattanam during the 2007 excavations (Photo KCHR)

The purpose of the research group is to provide a forum for international collaborators, to direct future research at Pattanam (including conservation) and, broadening out from this, establish research agendas and programmes throughout the Indian Ocean. The members comprise land and maritime archaeologists, anthropologists, historians and epigraphers, who have broad expertise throughout the region and have published extensively.

Group members

  • Dr Shinu Abraham (St Lawrence University, USA)
  • Dr Lucy Blue (Southampton University, UK)
  • Prof Robin Coningham (Durham University, UK)
  • Dr Federico De Romanis (Università degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata”, Italy)
  • Dr Derek Kennet (Durham University, UK)
  • Dr Raghava Varier (Arya Vaidyasala Kottackal, Kerala, India)
  • Dr K Rajan (Pondicherry University, India)
  • Dr Steven Sidebotham (Delaware University, USA)
  • Dr V Selvakumar (Tamil University, Tanjore, India)
  • Dr Heidrun Schenk ((Tissamaharama-Projek des Deutschen Archäologischen Institut, Bonn, Germany)
  • Dr KP Shajan (UK)
  • Dr Y Subrayalu (Institut Français de Pondichéry, India)
  • Dr Kesavan Veluthat (Mangalore University)
  • Pattanam-P.J.Cherian Dupes Current Science Journal and International Archaeological Community

    http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/jul252009/236.pdf
    Accession Date and Time 02-11-2011;10.45Pictures From Article By P.J.Cherian in Current Science  Vol.97; No 2 2009-July Titled 
    Chronology of Pattanam-A Multi Cultural Port Site on the Malabar Coast

     Shocking Reality-
                                         Empty  Trenches  at Pattanam  (2011)          

    Where is the  Residential Complex  Claimed by Cherian?

    Where is the Warehouse Claimed by Cherian ?

                                             Where is the Wharf  and Pier Excavated by Cherian?

      The Demolished Remains of the so called  Wharf Structure Deposited Near the Trenches

    Picture of P.J.Cherian and Biblical Scholar Discussing Pattanam

    P.J.Cherian with Biblical Scholar on Dead Sea Scrolls Robert Eisenman Discussing On Pattanam

    Pictures of Knanaya Christian Scholar at Seminar on Pattanam

     Knanaya Christian Scholar Sandeep Abraham   Discussing on Pattanam with Dr  S. Sidebothemat Seminar  on Pattanam 

    Knanaya  Christian Scholar Sundeep Abraham Being Briefed on Pattanam by P.J.Cherian

    Pattanam is Muziris-Claim By Kochi Biennale Foundation

    Source: www.kochimuzirisbiennale.org
    Organisation: Kochi Biennale Foundation
    Year founded: 2011
    http://www.biennialfoundation.org/biennials/kochi-muziris-biennale-india/
    Accession Date and Time 29-10-2011;2.00PM
    The Kochi-Muziris Biennale seeks to invoke the latent cosmopolitan spirit of the modern metropolis of Kochi and its mythical past, Muziris, and create a platform that will introduce contemporary international visual art theory and practice to India, showcase and debate new Indian and international aesthetics and art experiences and enable a dialogue among artists, curators, and the public.
    * The Kochi-Muziris Biennale seeks to create a new language of cosmopolitanism and modernity that is rooted in the lived and living experience of this old trading port, which, for more than six centuries, has been a crucible of numerous communal identities. Kochi is among the few cities in India where pre-colonial traditions of cultural pluralism continue to flourish. These traditions pre-date the post-Enlightenment ideas of cultural pluralism, globalisation and multiculturalism. They can be traced to Muziris, the ancient city that was buried under layers of mud and mythology after a massive flood in the 14th century. The site was recently identified and is currently under excavation. It is necessary to explore and, when necessary, retrieve memories of this past, and its present, in the current global context to posit alternatives to political and cultural discourses emanating from the specific histories of Europe and America. A dialogue for a new aesthetics and politics rooted in the Indian experience, but receptive to the winds blowing in from other worlds, is possible.
    * The Kochi-Muziris Biennale seeks to establish itself as a centre for artistic engagement in India by drawing from the rich tradition of public action and public engagement in Kerala, where Kochi is located. The emergence of Kerala as a distinct political and social project with lessons for many developing societies owes also to aesthetic interventions that have subverted notions of social and cultural hierarchies. These interventions are immanent in the numerous genres and practices of our rich tradition of arts. In a world of competing power structures, it is necessary to balance the interests and independence of artists, art institutions, and the public.
    * The Kochi-Muziris Biennale seeks to reflect the new confidence of Indian people who are slowly, but surely, building a new society that aims to be liberal, inclusive, egalitarian and democratic. The time has come to tell the story of cultural practices that are distinct to the Indian people and local traditions, practices and discourses that are shaping the idea of India. These share a lot with the artistic visions emerging from India’s neighborhood. The Biennale also seeks to project the new energy of artistic practices in the subcontinent.
    * The Kochi-Muziris Biennale seeks to explore the hidden energies latent in India’s past and present artistic traditions and invent a new language of coexistence and cosmopolitanism that celebrates the multiple identities people live with. The dialogue will be with, within, and across identities fostered by language, religion and other ideologies. The Biennale seeks to resist and interrogate representations of cosmopolitanism and modernity that thrive by subsuming differences through cooption and coercion.
    * The Kochi-Muziris Biennale seeks to be a project in appreciation of, and education about, artistic expression and its relationship with society. It seeks to be a new space and a fresh voice that protects and projects the autonomy of the artist and her pursuit to constantly reinvent the world we live in.

    Pattanam is Muziris-International Lobbying

    Print Edition

    Photo by: Jay A. Waronker, artist
      Jerusalem Post A revival of Jewish heritage on the Indian tourism trail
    By SHALVA WEIL 16/07/2010
    Reconstruction of the beautiful Parur synagogue is proceeding at a dizzying pace, and underlines the special ties Jews enjoyed with other faiths in south India.
    For years, visitors to the Parur synagogue in south India would be led into the gatehouse with a rusty key borrowed from a Christian neighbor. They would make their way across a dim, empty entrance hall, flanked by rooms including one which used to function as a Hebrew class, and they would then tread warily on a path with a garden full of snakes on either side leading to the synagogue.On the wall facing them on the side of the inner synagogue building, the visitors would distinguish a large plaque with Hebrew writing engraved in stone in 1616 by one David Ya’acov Castiel Mudaliar. Inside the two-story building, dusty chandeliers and wooden rosettes on the ceiling would testify to the astonishing beauty of the Parur synagogue.In the center of the sanctuary stood a round podium with a holy book still open on the cantor’s stand. Visitors could then go up a special spiral staircase leading from the sanctuary to the abandoned women’s gallery, where the Torah was read in front of the women and the portion of the law reached the ears of the men downstairs. The women themselves entered the gallery by a special staircase from behind, but this was long ago destroyed.Last month, the government of Kerala, India’s southernmost state, armed with a matching grant from the central government, started the reconstruction of the Parur synagogue that used to be frequented by Cochin Jews before they came on aliya, largely in the 1950s. The last of the community immigrated in the 1970s, leaving behind a mere handful of people, and the synagogue has remained in disuse since then. Today, fewer than 40 Cochin Jews remain on the Malabar coast.

    The conservation is progressing at such a pace that the chief architect in charge of the project, Benny Kuriakose, believes it will be completed by the autumn. This governmental and federal project could be a beacon for other countries, which pay lip-service to the preservation of Jewish heritage.

    “I was very excited to hear that the Kerala government is renovating the Parur synagogue and restoring it to the glory of its past,” said Tirza Lavi, a native of Parur, and a today a curator of the Heritage Center for Cochin Jews at Nevatim, south of Beersheba. “We hope that Parur will be a showcase to the younger generation, displaying our communities’ rich and interesting history. I am sure that Cochin Jews in Israel will be glad to take part in the project and share their knowledge and memories.”

    INDIA’S JEWS, though a minuscule minority (numbering only 28,000 at their peak in 1948), were loyal citizens and contributed to the development of India in all walks of life. India is fully aware of the special relationship with Israel and the love of that country by thousands of young Israelis, who go on the almost mandatory India trip after the army, and are often joined there by their parents.

    The reconstruction of the Parur synagogue celebrates the extraordinary relationship the Jews enjoyed with members of other religions in India, including Muslims, Christians and Hindus in the south. Despite a brief period under the Portuguese, the Jews of India never suffered anti-Semitism.

    The reconstruction of the Parur synagogue is only a small cog in the wheel of a huge project called the Muziris Heritage Project, which includes archeological excavations and the reconstruction of other historical monuments in the area, such as temples, churches and mosques. The idea is to create a tourism trail from the ancient port of Muziris, today known as Kodungallor, through Cochin, Parur and other nearby areas, and develop the already-existing tourism boom. Today, Kerala is the eighth most favorite tourist destination in the world.

    The seeds of the monumental project were planted only a few years ago. The beautiful Paradesi synagogue in Jew Town, Cochin, constructed in 1568, has been a well-known tourist site ever since Indira Gandhi attended its quatercentenary celebrations in 1968 and the Indian government issued a special commemorative stamp on the occasion. In more recent history, however, the Kerala government agreed to undertake the renovation of another abandoned Cochin Jewish synagogue belonging to the Malabari Jews in the village of Chendamangalam, near Cochin. In February 2006, the synagogue was reopened with an exhibition on the Cochin Jews, and the synagogue has become a popular tourist destination.

    “The Chendamangalam Synagogue Museum opening in 2006 gave me the courage, hope and joy that the restoration of others of Kerala’s synagogues may be possible during my lifetime and indeed, shaping the legacy of my community is my passion,” Galia Hacco, who grew up in Chendamangalam, said.

    “Communicating this legacy in India to Indians is the purpose of this involvement.”

    In the same year, the Cultural Department of the Kerala government embarked upon an ambitious heritage- preservation-cum-tourism project in the area known as Muziris, embracing both Chendamangalam and Parur. Muziris was a thriving port in the first century BCE that used to have trade contacts with Rome, Greece, China and the Middle East. Cargo vessels from West Asia, the Mediterranean and East Africa used to drop anchor at the port. St. Thomas, the apostle, is believed to have set foot in Kerala through Muziris. It is here that India’s first church, Mar Thoma Church, and first mosque, Cheraman Juma Masjid, are located.

    The development project, which is already well on its way, will include the establishment of a maritime museum, a historic museum on Indian independence from the British and museums dealing with Syrian Christian, Islamic and Jewish heritage.

    In Cochin Jewish tradition, the port of Muziris, which is known as Kodungallor today and was called Cranganore in the past, is legendary, and was the site where many Jews lived until a tsunami caused a fatal flood in the middle of the 14th century. All the surviving Jews and the other inhabitants moved over to Chendamangalam, Cochin and other centers. Jewish songs in the local Malayalam language still recall the incident.

    Archeological excavations at the site of Pattanam, near Muziris, now in their fourth consecutive season, have unearthed definite evidence of the port of Muziris, mentioned by the Romans, as well as in local Tamil texts. Sundeep Abraham, an independent Christian researcher from the Cnanite (Knanya) community, which migrated from Edessa to Muziris in the mid fourth century CE, said: “The Muziris Heritage Project will document the rich heritage of the ancient port city of Cranganore. One can witness the causes for the rise and fall of this once prosperous capital of ancient Kerala as it showcases the heritage of the ancient era beginning with the Muziris archeological site at Pattanam up to modern-era social reformers, who worked to emancipate the struggling underprivileged societies which bore the brunt of the ancient caste system of Kerala society.”

    THE DISCOVERY of the ancient port of Muziris within one kilometer of the Parur synagogue has caused increased interest in Kerala among scholars, who are speculating about the connection between the commercial port and the ancient settlement of the Jews in the area.

    Dr. P.J. Cherian, a researcher and director of the Pattanam archeological research since 2007, is optimistic of finding some material evidence of Jewish or Middle Eastern trading links. “One of the interesting finds of the last season,” he said,” was the turquoise glazed pottery of West Asian origin in the pre-Roman layers. We are awaiting its analytical report and hope it will be of help in tracing the early Jewish links with the Malabar Coast.”

    The present synagogue was erected in the 17th century, but probably stands on an older structure dating to the 12th century. “As with other Cochin synagogues, the synagogue is made up of not one building but a collection of parts forming a distinct compound,” explains Jay Waronker, who teaches architecture at the Southern Polytechnic State University in Marietta, Georgia, and is writing a thesis about Cochin synagogue architecture. “Parur is notable for having the greatest number of connected and consecutive pieces which have survived fully intact, albeit rotting and crumbling. Unique to this synagogue is the way its parts are formally arranged and linked in a highly axial and ceremonial fashion. This same organization is also seen in some Hindu temples of Kerala and at later churches in the region.”

    Benny Kuriakose, the Chennai architect directing the reconstruction of the Parur synagogue and other historical monuments, has made every attempt to conserve the former synagogue structure, and goes to great pains to try to reconstruct features that disappeared long ago. A case in point is the disintegrated stairway that once was connected to the second entrance, where the two square storerooms are located and adjacent to the breezeway that led up to the women’s gallery.

    He is turning to members of the community to aid him to sketch it as it once was in order to produce an authentic reconstruction. Another example is the entry door of the gatehouse, where the original ground floor had wooden shuttered windows, but today there are only rolling shutters covering the windows. The newly reconstructed ark will be a work of art. The previous one, which was beautifully gilded and painted in Kerala Jewish tradition, was taken to the Israel Museum in the 1990s.

    Marian Sofaer, the project director of the exhibition on the Cochin Jews, which was introduced in the renovated Chendamangalam synagogue in 2006, summed it up: “The Kerala synagogues create an opportunity to present Jewish life and culture to Indians in the context of their own history and culture, to add to the diversity of the eco-tourism circuits in the Muziris Heritage Project and to remind us of the safe haven that India has provided to Jews during the 2,000 years of Jewish life in India.”

    The writer, a Hebrew University researcher, is a specialist on Indian Jewry. She co-curated the exhibition on Cochin Jews in the synagogue of Chendmangalam.


    Picture of P.J.Cherian’s Archaeological Team at International Seminar on Pattanam

    From Left -P.J.Cherian, S.Sharma CPM  MLA, Dr. Thomas Issac CPM minister, P.Govinda Pillai, CPM  Idealogue, M.A.Baby CPM minister and Kodiyeri Balakrishnan CPM minister


    Pictures of Knanaya Nazarene Museum Chairman with Pattanam Excavation Team

    Jose Dominic , Chairman of Proposed  Knanaya Nazarene Academy Museum of Knanaya Church along with
    K.P.Shajan,  and Selvakumar at Pattanam

    Pattanam Becomes Contentious Issue

    • October 31, 2011
    • By Vinod Nedumudy
    • DC
    • Kochi

    The historical excavation project at Pattanam and Kodungalloor and the state tourism department’s role in it, is proving to be a fiercely contentious issue.
    Called the Muziris Heritage Tourism Project, the bone of contention is the very name of the project. Not only is it not clear that present day Pattanam is in fact the 3000-year-old port of Muziris, but turning it into a tourism project has raised the hackles of many historians who believe historical excavations and tourism should not be mixed.
    Excavation at the two sites has been going on for the past five years. Remnants of amphora and other pottery pieces dating to the Roman, Parthian and Sassanian dynasties as well as some human skeletons have been recovered. Forty lakh artifacts, a majority of them belonging to the 15th century, have also been recovered.
    The excavation is being handled by the Kerala Council for Historical Research (KCHR), a government body, and some historians say that KCHR does not have the expertise to handle such an important project and it should be handed over to the Archaeological Survey of India.
    The Muziris Heritage Tourism Project website goes one step further and establishes that “present Kodungallur had been named Mahodayapuram, Makothevarpattanam Muyirikkodu and Muziris by the Greeks and Romans, Shingly by the Jews, Cranganore by the Portuguese.“
    “The present day Kodungallur, situated 30 km north of Cochin and believed to be Muziris of the past, is said to have been first occupied around 1,000 BC and continued to be active till the 13th century AD.”
    The website further says: “The prosperous port of Muziris (Muziris Heritage Tour), at the mouth of the Periyar, overlooking the Arabian Sea was engulfed and silted over by the flooding of the river (in 1341), leaving its actual site to conjecture. The excavations (Muziris Heritage Excavations) by the Kerala Council for Historical Research (KCHR) in 2007 and 2008 unearthed the archaeological and historical evidence which confirmed its location.”
    Prominent historian M.G.S. Narayan, questioning the premise that Pattanam is Muziris, says that the KCHR is making tall claims. “There are no archaeologists in the current team except Dr Selva Kumar of Tanjavur Tamil University. There is a hurry to establish that Pattanam is Muziris which is not correct. I suspect there was a politically corrupt design involving the previous LDF government behind the project,” he said.
    He, however, added that so far the project has not done any damage, but the Archaeological Survey of India is the competent body to guide the project.
    “In the first place Dr Cheriyan, who is the director of KCHR and who is controlling the present excavation, is not an archaeologist. Moreover, at this stage tourism should not be brought into the picture,” he said.
    “There is an attempt to establish that Muziris was a Roman colony and had interactions with different nations at different times and hence what evolved was multi-culturalism. They are trying to showcase it as a tourism object. They mean to say that Kodungallur didn’t have a culture of its own,” says K. Satheesh Chandran, co-ordinator of Socio-Cultural and Development Studies, an NGO based in Kochi.
    Unmindful of such criticism, the State Government is going ahead with the Muziris project and plans to inaugurate the first phase next April.
    Tourism Minister A.P. Anilkumar said that the State Government proposes to showcase this unique project before the ambassadors of various nations in New Delhi in the immediate future.
    Prof K.N. Panikkar, chairman of KCHR, said that the tourism component has been included in the project to raise money for it.
    He also said that KCHR has not come to any conclusion that Pattanam is Muziris. He said that he stands by his comments two years ago that he was not happy about naming the project the Muziris Heritage Tourism Project.
    He said he had expressed his concern that tourism should not be merged with historical heritage. Panicker had said then that “tourism as a possible source of revenue can be disastrous for the culture of a place.”
    Director of the project and of KCHR, Prof P.J. Cherian, says there is an attempt to target him saying that he was not an archaeologist.
    “I don’t know what kind of expertise they mean. Very scientific work is going on at Pattanam. Such work has not been undertaken since 1946. This could be a knowledge-based tourism project,” he said.
    Controversies apart, how to raise funds for an archaeological project is a key problem but showcasing it as a tourism landmark even before the artifacts are arranged, raises several questions.

    Muziris is at Pattanam- Claim by St’ George Forane Church

    St. George Basilica

    http://www.smcim.org/church/angamaly/article/47

    Accession Date and Time-31-10-2011; 11.20AM
        
    Christianity of Angamaly
    St. Thomas Tradition –a brief
    What we know about the history today, in general, is through that had already been recorded or written. A major part of the other side of the history still remains in the dark. The sleeping history can be explored to some extent and awakened through teamwork, by undertaking field studies, literature collections and analysis. In recent years a number of Christian historical books have been published. The major contents of all these works are almost new version of the old ones and the new inputs are very scanty. Lacks of proper field research, lapses shown in the protection of antique monuments, ignorance of foresight etc. have adversely influenced the quality of outcomes. Did St. Thomas really come to India? What are the authentic evidences available to establish the same? These questions are projected at all times and the solutions put forward are not fully satisfied with the many of scholars and researchers.
    Dr. Rajendra Prasad, the first President of the Republic of India, speaking on the occasion of the St. Thomas Day Celebrations at New Delhi on December 18, 1955, said, “Remember, St. Thomas came to India when many of the countries of Europe had not yet become Christian, and so those Indians who trace their Christianity to him have a longer history than many of the European Countries. And it is really a matter of pride that it so happened.”
    According to the Malabar tradition, St. Thomas the Apostle, came by sea, and landed at Cranganore (Kodungalloor) in A.D. 52. He preached gospel; converted high caste Hindu families in various places of Malabar and erected a few public places of worship. Then he moved to Coromandel and suffered martyrdom on or near Little mount. His body was brought to the town of Mylapore and was buried in a holy shrine (Santhome church)
    St. Thomas tradition might be considered to consist of elements of the traditions of Malabar, Mylapore or Coromandel and the Chaldean church. Some details of this combined tradition may be found in a few folk songs such as Rabban pattu, Veeradiyan pattu, Margam kali pattu etc, and some historical accounts both of which now exist in written records.
    Nevertheless, the people of Malabar undoubtedly possessed a rich oral tradition, which reflected fully or partially in their folk songs and even in written annals. And all these various vehicles of tradition were available in the 16th century to the inquisitive Portuguese, who made ample use of these sources and wrote down their accounts in the form of letters, reports, depositions and well-composed histories.
    Typical Traces 
    Of course, we may put aside the testimonies of forefathers of church like St. Ephrem, Ambrose and Gregory etc. However, the first landmark in the realm of tradition, which has solidified itself during the last twenty centuries, is the belief preserved in the Malabar Jews. They affirm that when they landed in Malabar in 69 A.D. they found there a colony of Christians.
    One of the source books for the life and mission of St. Thomas, the Apostle, is the work called “The Acts of St Thomas” which dates probably from early 3rd century. It is considered to be an apocryphal work, but serious scholars seem to favour the historical evidences mentioned in the work. According to the Acts, the Apostle St. Thomas preached gospel in the land of Gondaferes. This prince is the Parthian King Guduphara, who was ruler of Afghanistan and the Punjab during the second quarter of the first century A.D. The country called Parthia (B.C. 250-A.D.226) was included Northern and Western India and a large part of Indus valley (Major India). Till the middle of the 19th century even the existence of such a King was considered legendary or a myth. But, the most dramatic discovery in the field of numismatics in India effected a wonderful change in the realisation of this true whole story. In 1857, a large number of coins were discovered in Kabul, Kandahar and in the western and southern Punjab bearing the name of Gondophares. Some of these coins were now kept in the Lahore Museum.
    The St. Thomas tradition is not a creation of fancy. On the other hand the co-existence of co-ordinate facts, points to the definite conclusion that the Apostle did come to Malabar to make the earliest beginning for the propagation of Christianity.
    Origin of St Thomas Christians – A Topographical Outlook About AngamalyIn the church history, it is generally considered that the St Thomas Christian communities of Cragannore (Kodungalloor) and Palayoor were migrated to Angamaly during early periods of Christian era. Why these Christians selected Angamaly to migrate? Why Angamaly was chosen as the seat of Archbishop House for many ancient centuries? From the ancient period onwards, the highest density of population of St. Thomas Christians was seen at Angamaly, Why? Mar. Francis Ross recorded – the See of Angamaly was the most ancient See of India. – the See of Mylapore which was found by the Apostle Thomas himself, was transferred to Cragannore when the Christians left Mylapore and got themselves established in Cragannore, and the See of Angamaly was the continuation of the Cragannore See.” Why?
    According to the traditional belief, the apostle St. Thomas visited India two times and preached gospel. He started his initial journey to India with the traders through the silk route touching Takshasila (the capital of the Parthian Kingdom) and second time through the spice route.
    The land route, which was the common route followed by the traders engaged in oriental trade to fetch Chinese Porcelain and silk, and was able to reach North West India, ruled by the Parthian King Gondophoros. After his evangelization work in North India, St. Thomas is said to have returned to Jerusalem for attending the first Jerusalem council via Barygaza ( Braukaccha or Broach), which is mentioned as an important port-town in Gujarat by Periplus of Erythraen sea.
    St. Thomas is believed to have come to South India after the Jerusalem council via Persian Gulf and Socotora.  Attempts to historicize the activities of St. Thomas in South India would necessitate a close at the international developments, against which the apostolic work is depicted in tradition. It was possible to reach Malabar (Kerala) coast from European countries within 42 days through spice route (sea route) with the advantage of monsoon winds. The discovery of the advantage of monsoon winds for navigation, in Northern Indian Ocean sector in A.D. 45 by Hippalus, increased the sea traffic between Roman Empire and Malabar. St. Thomas established seven churches (Communities) at Muzuris(Kodungalloor ), Palayoor, Paravoor (Kottakkavu), Kokkamangalam, Niranam, Kollam and Chayal (Nilakkal) in Malabar. Even though this belief may not be fully realistic, or otherwise if it is so, it can be pointed that there were other nearby places also, like Angamaly, Alangad, Mala, Malayattoor etc, which were enlightened by the Gospel with the visit of St. Thomas, which can be substantiated with the ancient topographical features and tracing the trade centers of that time. The possibility of Angamally as the origin of St Thomas Christians cannot be simply ignored. No doubt, it is a thrust area and needs a serious research studies in this subject.
    Angamaly (position 10° 20¢N & 76° 37¢E) was well connected with the rivers and mountains; and it was the one of the main trade junction of spices (mainly pepper) with guardhouse, and path way to Spice route in Malabar. It is believed that St. Thomas traveled from Malabar to Thamizhakam through land route (Ghat route) crossing Western ghats. This route, starting from Muzuris to Madurai /Pandi, connects different places, mainly Angamaly, Manjapra, Malayattor, Kothamangalam, Adimali,Poopara, Bodimeetu, Bodynaikanoor and also via Admali, Munnar, Pollachi, Udmalpettu, etc. Kings, Traders and Missionaries of various religions used this route, for a long period in ancient centuries.
    An account about this route, given in the Ernakulam District Gazetter is as follows: “According to tradition, St. Thomas came to Malayattor by the then familiar route, through some passages in the western ghats which linked Kerala with Pandien kingdom”. There is also a narration about the same fact in the famous Ramban pattu.
    River valley-civilization 
    It would be very interesting to know that the mountain route (path to spice route) was actually ended at Angamaly and the river originated from Western Ghats, flowing through Angamaly, was used for inland navigation, which was connected with the Arabian Sea. This wide and long river, later named as Periyar (In Tamil ‘periya are’ means large river), was partially diverted away from Angamaly during the great flood in 1341. This great flood resulted deposition of silt in the various locations of the river (This feature is very evident at the river strip of Naithode-Chethikode regions) and obstructed the river flow by reducing its volume. This river is known as Manjally River now.
    The river (Manjally River) almost surrounding Angamaly had great influence in the development of a unique community culture and also a main trade center. Recent years, the topographical structure of this river has been considerably changed again and reformed as a small stream. The olden remarkable memories of non-mechanized sailing vessels means flag vessels (pathamari) for foreign trades, warehouses, guard house, boat jetties, markets (angadies) etc located near the banks of this river are placed today in the history of myth. This was the river, which played a major role in the formation and concentration of ideal location of St Thomas Syrian Christians at Angamaly, from the beginning of Christian era. It could be seen that the peculiar geographical features of Angamaly was the basis of the unique civilization in and around Angamaly during the ancient period. If we go through the Periyar valley civilization, a number of hidden facts can be revealed about Angamaly. From the adjacent regions of Angamaly, namely Kidagoor, Kodussery, Malluserry, Karippasserry etc, megalithic monuments were discovered during the last few decades. In the eastern side of the Angamally, it was unearthed (1986) urn burial jars containing remains of rusted iron tools. From Kodusserry, 783 Roman silver coins were unearthed in 1987. These coins were used in 1st century A.D. in various parts of India, which points that Angamally was well connected with the international and national trades.
    An urn burial was discovered in January 2005 while digging for a foundation pit at Karippassery, a small hamlet near Vattaparambu village, lying about 5 km south east of Angamaly town in Ernakulam district. It was found in a plot owned by Mr. Sebi Kavalipadan. No mortuary goods were found in the urn but it was covered with pottery lid. A white sticky organic material, probably the disintegrated and decomposed bones was noticed in the bottom portion of the urn. The burial is datable to the Iron Age-Early Historic period. The site is situated at about 10 m MSL on a sloping laterite flat surrounded by river terraces, palate channels and flood plains of the Periyar and the Chalakudy rivers. A number of urn burials and few solenoid cists are reported in the nearby areas. A punch marked coin hoard and many megalithic burials were earlier found at Kodussery, about 1 km NE of the site (Journal of Centre for Heritage studies, Vol2, 2005)
    The foreign traveler Cosmos, who visited in India (A.D. 522) in his Topographia Christiana, stated that, ‘Male was the center of pepper trade, where a Bishop was doing services among a strong Christian community’. Even though there are difference of opinion about the location of Male, it is believed that Male was located in the present place of Angamaly (Anga-Male).
    It has come to the notice that most of the historical significances were brought to Kodungalloor by linking the names of historic places such as Cragannore, Mahadevarpattanam, Muzuris, Vanchi, etc. to Kodungalloor during the first few Christian centuries itself. This could not fully be justified; because, the recent archaeological findings at Pattanam (N. Paravoor) such as large scale collection of Italian amphora jars, roulette tiles, Mesopotamian torpedo jar, west Asian glazed potteries, beads and semi-precious red stones, bricks etc used between B.C. (1st century) and medieval periods, projected a high level academic dispute during 2004-07 and finally, experts in this field recognized that , the actual location of Muzuris was at Pattanamm and not at Kodungaloor.
    Vanished Nazraney Heritage values 
    The present Forane Church in the name of St George (West church) was located at the bank of river (Manjally River). There was a boat-jetty locally known as pallikadvu (Church boat-jetty) at northwest side of this church that was used till the end of the 19th century. In 2001, an investigation team identified the remains of laetrite stone steps (padavu). Earlier an extension of the river was directly connected with the boundary of the church plot and later due to the shortage of river water, the riverbed reformed as paddy field. At present, when rainwater floods during monsoon season in the paddy field, reflects the paddy field as river view, which recalls the ancient topographical similarity. Even though this location is not existent now, a clear and real proof is available in the Varthamanapusthakam.
    In historical records, it is seen that there was a regional ruler, known as Mangattu Kaimal who resided near the church during the 16th century. An account seen in Jornada is as follows: “Before the Archbishop left Vaipicota the Caimal of Angamaly (Kaimal of Angamaly) came to visit him, whom they call the black king (Karutha tavazhi) of Angamaly because there is another whom they call the white (Velutha tavazhi), and both are reigning, because it is a custom among the Malabaris to have in many places two and three kings of a Kingdom with lands distinct from one another, but all give orders,..” The remains of edifices of the King are still seen in a private property near the church. The king had donated large areas of land to the church, by exempting land tax. The typical boundary stones (thoranakallu) in different locations are still remaining near the premises of the churches.
    The documents relating to the lands indicate that a major part of the Angamaly area was assigned to the church in the early period. When the people from the other places migrated to Angamaly, they occupied the properties of church in different periods. Later, during the Revenue settlement done in the mid 19th century and the land rules established during the period 1945-54, the people having the land properties of the church on lease, became the owners of the same.
    In the four volumes of Basic Tax Registers (1955-60), kept at village office, Angamaly the details of land properties of churches were available. The survey numbers in the first three volumes were numbered as from 1/1A to 154 C, 155/1cc to 283/7A and from 283/7B to 419/4B respectively. These BTRs of Kothakulangara South Village were prepared based on the division of villages, which took place on 1.10. 1956. Accordingly it is seen that the valia pallai (St. George catholic church) had owned 36.82 acres of land (thandper or tax number 758), comprising, a total number of 75 plots and the cheria pallai (St Marys Jacobite church) had owned 11.65 acres of land (thandper or tax number 762), comprising, a total number of 33 plots in Angamaly.
    The cross is the symbol of Christianity in Kerala, especially when it is recalled that there were no images other than the cross in Kerala churches before the advent of the Portuguese. At Angamaly, three tall open air rock crosses installed in front of all the three churches are very ancient ( pre-Portuguese period) and attractive appearance. Out of which, the rock cross with hidden bells in the basement, situated in front of the St. Hormis Church (Eastern Church) was broken when a lorry hit on it in 1969. The experts failed to reinstate the cross in its original form.
    Ancient churches had mammoth walls (elephant walls) fixing rock lamps which surrounds the churches. These walls are very strong and its peculiar shape meant to resist the attack of elephants and enemies. The attractive mammoth walls of St. George church were demolished in 2005 and constructed new one in place of old mamooth walls.
    A huge rock baptismal font (St. George Forane Church), many centuries old, was found to be broken in many pieces and dumped near the priest’s kitchen due to the ignorance of its antique value. Bunches of inscribed copper plates in Tamil and old Malayalam version were also vanished. One of the copper plate remained there, was using as a platform for diesel generator.
    During the period of Tippu’s invasion of Kerala, he entered Angamaly in November 1789, by destroying the Nedumkotta (a fort), which was built exclusively aiming to protect Travancore from Tippu’s attack. Tippu Sultan attacked on three ancient churches of Angamaly including ancient edifices attached with the churches. The remains of the laterite foundation stones of the edifices can still be seen in the St George church ground. The façade of the ruined ancient St George church stood as the entrance of symmetry for more than two centuries and was demolished in September 2005. An account available in Dr. Buchanan’s letter (1806) is as follows:
    “When Tippu waged war with the King of Travancore in 1791, he sent detachments in every direction to destroy the Christian churches, and particularly the ancient edifices at Angamaly; two thousand men penetrated into the mountains, and were directed to the place by the sound of its bells. They sprung a mine under the altar walls of each church, and the inhabitants who had fled to the higher mountains witnessed the explosion. But the walls of the grand front being five feet and a half thick (I measured them yesterday), they did not attempt to demolish them for want of powder. In the mean time Tippu, hearing that Lord Cornwallis had invaded Mysore, Suddenly recalled his church destroying detachments. Next year Tippu was obliged to sign any terms that were offered him; but Lord Cornwallis forgot to desire him to rebuild the Christian churches. The inhabitants, however have rendered them fit for public worship; and have proceeded some way in restoring the Cathedral to its former state. The Archbishop’s residence and all the other public buildings are destroyed. The priests led me over the ruins, and showed me the vestiges of their ancient grandeur, asking me if I thought their Zion would ever be rebuilt. Angamaly is built on a hill. I told them, that their second temple would perhaps, have more glory than their first”
    “Two of the churches here are Roman, the third Syrian. But the two former would gladly return to their mother church”.
    The renovation work of ruined St George’s church by Tippu was actually initiated by Paramakal Thoma Katanar and the work was completed after his period. This rebuilt church was partially demolished during 2003-04, for making facilities for the construction of new modern church.

    Angamaly is an important Diocese of the Syrian Orthodx churches. The present renovated St Mary’s Jacobite church is enriched with ancient mural paintings (17th century) on the walls, are noteworthy; especially the popular wall- paintings of ‘the hell’ and ‘the heaven’. The hell is portrayed with Hindu iconographic codes, which is evident from the Bellzebool devil on the top, looking like a Hindu demon. Most of these attractive paintings are partially spoiled with the electrical wiring works

    Pattanam and Portugese-The International undercurrents beneath Pattanam Comes to Light

     THE COLONIAL PORTUGESE WHO RANSACKED INDIA, SLAUGHTERED KUNJALI MARAKKAR CHIEFTAIN OF ZAMORIN

    RECEIVED BY PATTANAM EXCAVATION TEAM  ON SEPTEMBER 2011

     HTTP://UCCOLLEGE.EDU.IN/HISTORY/NEWS/KOTTAPURAM-EXCAVATIONS-VISIT-OF-THE-PORTUGAL-AMBASSADOR-TO-INDIA/

     ACCESSION DATE AND TIME- 31-10-2011;11.00AM

    KOTTAPURAM EXCAVATIONS: VISIT OF THE PORTUGAL AMBASSADOR TO INDIA

    Jenee Peter participated in the discussions and open forum held at Kottapuram Fort, Kodungallur, Kerala on 23rd September 2011. The session was in connection with the visit of the Portugal Ambassador to India Dr Jorge Roza de Oliveira. The meeting was in attendance of Prof K.S Mathew, Dr Hemachandran, Muziris heritage project and Kottapuram excavations team members, Kerala state department of Archaeology officials and the media. An exhibition was held in the site I connection to the visit. Dr Roza was delighted when Mr. Benny Kuriakose and Prof Mathew pointed out that the Malayalam has more than 400 loan words from Portuguese while Goa which was held till 1974 and seen as the headquarters of the Portuguese empire in the Indies has just five loan words. The oft repeated word in contemporary documents is boss signifying a hegemonic relationship with the natives perhaps.
    The visit was followed by a detailed visit of the recently excavated trenches in the site and brain storming. Dr Jenee is archaeological consultant for Kottapuram excavations.

    Illegal Trenching and Transfer of Antiquities From Pattanam to U.C College Museum With Knowledge of P.J.Cherian in 1998 Before Licensed Excavations -Documents Speak

     HTTP://UCCOLLEGE.EDU.IN/HISTORY/ABOUT/

     ACCESSION DATE AND TIME-31-10-2011;10.25AM

    WELCOME

    Dept. Picture

    History has been always posing new questions about the past and answering old questions in newer ways. We at the department teach students to think critically about how the past is fundamentally similar to the present yet different from the present, and together shapes the present. Hence the past is recalled and remembered in the present.
    History has long been a popular field of study, and with good reason. Thinking about how to act in the present and how people have acted in the past…. the forces that shape people’s lives in the present than to understand the forces that have shaped people’s lives in the past… critical thinking, careful reading, energetic researching, analytical writing, and effective communicating ….
    The department of History forms an integral part of the Social Sciences stream of Union Christian College. As one of the earliest departments to start a full fledged under-graduate programme in History, this spirit followed in starting a Masters programme in 1965. Since then, the department has grown leaps and bounds and many young scholars joined the department. The highly qualified and dedicated staff on rolls has always been the greatest strength and identity of this department.

    Background
    • 1921: Union Christian College begins its historic journey
    • 1923* – 1965: Clubbed with the department of Economics. Rev. Roger Hicks, a missionary and graduate from Oxford University, and Dr K.I Martandavarma, were among the pioneering teacher- researchers.
    • 1965: A separate department was constituted with Dr A.K Baby as the first head of the department
    • 1965: Post graduate programme in History began
    • 1970s, 80s: The department undertook pioneering research in medieval and modern history led by Dr T.I Poonnen, and Dr A.K Baby. At the same time, the department laid the foundation for interdisciplinary studies which still forms the essence of the department. Young scholars were promoted as teachers who went on to do research in different periods in Indian history. There were luminaries among the students too like P.K Michael Tharakan and others. The eminent historian Prof. Rajan Gurukkal joined the department during this period.
    • 1974: Birth of a modest archaeological museum
    • 1998: reorganization of the museum, beginning of the Certificate Course in Archaeology, Centre for Cultural and Ecological Studies coordinated by Dr P.J Cherian and Dr K.V Kunhikrishan. The museum enhanced collections from various explorations of archaeological sites in Periyar basin like Kunnukara and Pattanam.
    • 2000: Considering the consistent academic credentials, recognized as a Research Centre in History under Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam
    • 2002: The UGC Sponsored Advanced Diploma in Archaeology and Museology, a three year programme affiliated to Mahatma Gandhi University began.
    Mission Statement and Objective of the Department
    • Research
    • Inter-Disciplinary Initiatives
    • Discourses
    • Holistic, qualitative student growth

    Heads of the Department

    • Dr A.K Baby: 1965-84
    • Prof. A.K Abdul Kareem: 1984-96
    • Dr N.Lakshmikutty    : 1996-2000
    • Prof. B.T Joy: 2000-01
    • Dr P.D Johny: 2001-03
    • Prof. P.M Varkey: 2003-08
    • Prof. Annie. M Thomas: 2008 onwards

    Former Teaching Faculty

    • Dr T.I Punnen
    • Dr.K. I Marthanda Varma
    • Fr T.K Alias
    • T.M Mathew
    • Dr Rajan Gurukkal
    • Dr K.V Kunjikrishnan
    • Dr C.J Varghese
    • Prof Abraham Joseph
    • Dr. M. P Marykutty
    • Dr P.J Cherian
    • What is the Role of U.C.College, Aluva, Ernakulam District, in Pattanam Excavations?

       http://uccollege.edu.in/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Kottappuram.jpg
      Accession Date and Time-29-10-2011;3.00PM

      KOTTAPURAM EXCAVATIONS/ MUZIRIS HERITAGE PROJECT

      The Kottapuram Fort (Cranganore Fort or Kodungallur Fort), was constructed by the Portuguese in mid 16th century CE and was later demolished and rebuilt by the Dutch in around 1663 CE. This fort is situated on the western banks of river Periyar or about five km east off the river mouth in Kodungallur taluk, Thrissur district, Kerala, India. It was briefly the military camp of Tipu Sultan in the Periyar region and was later bought by the newly emerged Travancore state after them defeating the Dutch in the Battle of Colachel. By the eighteenth century, the fort appears to have been in ruins. In the early decades of 20thcentury, this fort came in the hands of the Travancore State Archaeological department after Tipu Sultan and the English and has been a protected monument ever since.
                        In 2007, the State Department of Archaeology, government of Kerala explored this site systematically and laid out few trial trenches. As a result of this debris clearance and excavation, ruins of the fort along with many artifacts both of indigenous and foreign origin were unearthed.  Since 2009, excavations have been carried out under the Muziris Heritage Project. The recent archaeological excavations from April 2010 have revealed at least four structural phases along with many antiquities and non local ceramics. Many of these pottery types will go into forming a ceramic sequence for the region which also includes known sites like Pattanam. Important antiquities found at Kottapuram include, canon balls, local and foreign coins, smoke pipes, tiles, bricks, nails, terracotta animal figurines, beads and glass bangles. These artifacts help in relatively dating the different periods of occupation in the site.
      This site has also yielded number of faunal remains along with one human extended burial and other osteo-archaeological remains.  Ceramics belong to various categories namely; celadon, porcelain, turquoise glazed pottery, Sanjan type and torpedo jar etc indicate that this area had played a vital role in the Indian Ocean trade perhaps from 9th, 10th century CE onwards. Archaeological evidence from pre-fortification levels suggests an early occupation in the site and its environs.
      Muziris Heritage Project (MHP) is a large project initiated by the Gov’t of Kerala and supported with a major grant from the central government’s Ministry of Culture. The project aims at restoring the ‘Muziris Heritage’ and making it an attractive area for those who are interested in the history and heritage of a country. The recent attempts include a high diplomatic level discussion on devising “Spice Route Tourism’. The Heritage site covers the Kodungalur Taluk in Thrissur District and the North Paravur Taluk in Ernakulam District. The project aims at renovating and maintaining different old structures there, so that they can be opened to the public. In the first phase, the Paliyam Kovilakom, Paliyam Nalukettu, two synagogues and two archaeological sites (Pattanam and Kottapuram) are expected to be made accessible to the public.

      Twenty seven museums are planned in the first phase and will educate public and students in the history of this part of the country particularly cultural history. The ancient art and cultural forms also will be rejuvenated as part of the project. The plan is to make the Muziris a living heritage and interpretation centre rather than a mere tourist attraction.  Excavations continue in the two archaeological sites under this project; Pattanam is in the sixth season of excavation and Kottapuram is in the second season of excavation. Site museums are planned in both these sites after conservation applying current global standards.

      The Department of History is a major consultant to this project and students attended the field school at Kottapuram and other MHP sites

      Pattanam is Muziris-Tehelka Reports on Version by Benny Kuriakose of Muziris Heritage Project

       http://www.tehelka.com/story_main46.asp?filename=Bu110910Muziris.asp
      Accession Date and Time 29-10-2011;3.40PM
      MUZIRIS: FIRST CENTURY PEPPER HUB TO BE TURNED INTO TOURIST HOTSPOT
      BY HIGIO ZARNGAM
      MUZIRIS: FIRST CENTURY PEPPER HUB TO BE TURNED INTO TOURIST HOTSPOT
      IT WAS once a trade hub and the gateway to Rome and Egypt from India. In its heyday, Muziris was a popular commercial centre, where merchants from overseas came to trade gold and gemstones in exchange for “black gold” (pepper), and other spices. Then it fell off the map.
      Now, courtesy the Kerala government, efforts are being made to turn this 1st century BC port, that remained buried for centuries, into a hot new tourist spot. The location of Muziris had long been a mystery for archaeologists and historians. It appears in historical documents as a business and cultural hub with strong international ties, and finds mention in Tamil Sangam literature from 600 BC to 300 AD.
      The discovery was made during the 2007-08 excavations, when Roman remains almost 2,000 years old, were found some 220 km from the state capital Thiruvananthapuram. “At the moment, the monuments are in decay and barely tourist-worthy,” rues Benny Kuriakose, director of the Muziris heritage project.
      Its rehabilitation will also mean jobs for locals and traditional artisans. The project’s first phase will be opened to tourists by December. “Our department is planning the Muziris project on a global scale to attract more foreign tourists to the state,” says Unni Krishnan, planning officer of Kerala’s tourism board. But infrastructure is weak, and roads need to be broadened, feels Anish Kumar, CEO of Travel Planner, a Thiruvananthapuram- based tour operator.
      Kuriakose says the excavation has also shed new light on the Periyar basin, and the historic towns of Kodungallur, Pattanam and Paravur.


Dr.S.P.Udaykumar -Koodankulam US Professor running a WEB-University

Dr.S.P.Udaykumar -Koodankulam Books written

- ‘Om-made’ History: Preparing the Unlettered for the Future Hindu Rashtra
- Historicizing Myth and Mythologizing History: The Ayodhya Case in India
- Mapping the ‘Hindu’ Remaking of India
- Betraying a Futurist: The Misappropriation of Gandhi’s Ramarajya-

All works are Anti-Indian Mythologies well connected with NGOs and Christian Missionary.

அயோத்தியின் வரலாறு -எஸ்.பி 

 www.nakkheeran.in/users/frmArticles.aspx?A=7284


  
Details aabout S.P.Udyakumar in net.

S. P. UDAYAKUMAR

Udayakumar (affectionately known as “Kumar”) teaches at the New Jersey Governor’s School of Public Issues and the Future of New Jersey at Monmouth University. In 2007, he taught a course called “Race and Ethnicity and Globalization,” which capitalized on many of his published works. In 2008 and 2009, Udayakumar taught a course entitled “Nonviolent Leadership,” intended to focus on the theory and practice of nonviolence, with emphasis placed on Mahatma Gandhi and his influence on later leaders.[2]

Name:
S. P. Udayakumar

Title: 
Dr.

Organisation: 
South Asian Community Centre for Education and Research

Email:
drspudayakumaryahoo.com
spukvsnl.net

Web address: 
http://www.saccer.info

Phone: 
+91-4652-240657

Areas of Professional Interest: Conflict transformation, dialogue facilitation, sustainable reconciliation, elections monitoring, envisioning futures, human rights education, non-violence training, sustainable development, South Asia, East Africa etc.

Publications: Books:

  • Editor, Teaching Peace in South Asia (forthcoming).
  • Thakararu (Tamil translation of Johan Galtung’s Transcend & Transform). Nagercoil, India: Transcend South Asia, 2006.
  • Co-author with Johan Galtung, Education for Peace and Development (forthcoming from Information Age Publishers, US, 2006).
  • Editor, Disaster Education. Nagercoil, India: Transcend South Asia, 2006.
  • ‘Presenting’ the Past: Anxious History and Ancient Future in Hindutva India. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, 2005.
  • Editor, Handcuffed to History: Narratives, Pathologies, and Violence in South Asia. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, 2001.

TRANSCEND Peace University

 www.transcend.org/tpu/
Dialogue, Negotiation and Mediation (Dr. S. P. Udayakumar). TPU online courses mainly appeal to participants of graduate or post-graduate level, or people 

Bible College gives Doctorate for Money and Conversion.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.