Central Bank spend 5 Lakhs on Lawyers to deny 9 lakhs to Retired Staff

Bank loses Rs 5L in bid to deny 9L VRS benefit
MUMBAI: The Central Bank of India spent Rs 5.33 lakh in a 10-year legal battle to avoid paying Rs 9.5 lakh as retirement benefit to an employee on the grounds that she died two days before they cleared her name for the voluntary retirementscheme (VRS). But both the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court have ruled that Homai Darayas Postwala – an officer in the investment department – was entitled to the benefits.

Postwala, who served the Central Bank for 30 years, died on June 23, 2001. The bank argued that as it accepted her in the VRS retirement scheme on June 25 – two days after her death – her heirs were not entitled to the benefits of the scheme.

Eight years later, the HC ruled that as the bank had failed to provide the family any record or notification of her acceptance (or rejection) under the scheme, “it would have to be held that the application was accepted when she (Postwala) was alive”.

When her husband and son filed an RTI application in June 2011, they learnt that the bank had spent nearly half the amount due to Postwala fighting the case. They have now moved the Bombay High Court to enhance her pension from Rs 4,700 to Rs 6,700 per month after the Supreme Court accepted her rights under VRS.

Postwala had applied for the bank’s VRS scheme on February 22, 2001- the day it was announced. The bank did not include her in the first list, but her name appeared on the second list on June 30, 2001. The bank claimed that they had approved her name for the second list on June 25, two days after her death.

While arguing their side of the case in court, Postwala’s heirs said the bank had failed to communicate their decision, be it an acceptance or rejection, as is the norm. In fact, the family learned of her acceptance under the scheme only when they enquired with the bank after her death. They were told that she was not eligible for VRS.

The HC in July 2009 directed the bank to pay retirement and other dues under VRS to Postwala’s legal heirs in three months. The bank then appealed to the Supreme Court, which upheld the HC order in April 2011.

Postwala’s family has now filed a contempt petition in the HC since the pension amount has not been increased retrospective from July 2001. The family has also filed an appeal against the RTI order because the bank refused to provide receipts showing money paid to the lawyers.

Family seeks pension hike
MUMBAI: Homai Darayas Postwala had applied for the Central Bank of India’s VRS scheme on February 22, 2001- the day it was announced. The bank did not include her in the first list, but her name appeared on the second list on June 30, 2001. The bank claimed that they had approved her name for the second list on June 25, two days after her death.

While arguing their side of the case in court, Postwala’s heirs said the bank had failed to communicate their decision, be it an acceptance or rejection, as is the norm. In fact, the family learned of her acceptance under the scheme only when they inquired with the bank after her death. They were told that Postwala was not eligible for VRS.

The HC in July 2009 directed the bank to pay retirement and other dues under VRS to Postwala’s legal heirs in three months. The bank then appealed to the Supreme Court, which upheld the Bombay high court order in April 2011.

When her husband and son filed an RTI application in June 2011, they learnt that the bank had spent nearly half the amount due to Postwala fighting the case. They have now moved the Bombay High Court to enhance her pension from Rs 4,700 to Rs 6,700 per month after the Supreme Court accepted her rights under VRS.

Postwala’s family has also filed a contempt petition in the HC since the pension amount has not been increased retrospective from July 2001. The family has also filed an appeal against the RTI order because the bank refused to provide receipts showing money paid to the lawyers.

Advertisements

2 Responses to Central Bank spend 5 Lakhs on Lawyers to deny 9 lakhs to Retired Staff

  1. Pramila Devi Kapoor says:

    It is a common practice in Central Bank of India to enrich the Advocates and its legal staff at the cost of employees and landlords just to deny their rightful claims since the decision makers are not held responsible by the RBI/ Internal auditors on this count.

  2. Pramila Devi Kapoor says:

    It is a common practice in Central Bank of India to enrich the Advocates and its legal staff at the cost of employees and landlords just to deny their rightful claims since the decision makers are not held responsible by the RBI/ Internal auditors on this count.
    I am the land lady of old Chowk Branch Lucknow premises which had been vacated in June 2011after 71 years after lots of persuasion and intervention of Ministry of Finance. The bank is yet to clear its liabilities in respect of the said premises despite assurance at the highest level:-
    1. Pay a sum of Rs. 15533 per month as rent in respect of the said premises w.e.f. 12 March 2004 in terms of the judgement by the Hon’ble Prescribed Authority, Lucknow under Section 21 (8) of the of U.P. Act No XIII of 1972 registered as PA case 12/2004. On the other hand it has filed an appeal in the higher court knowing fully well that the enhanced rent is fully justified as it could not submit any evidence against it in the lower court during the seven year period the case was in the court.
    2. Pay the arrears of rent @ Rs. 437.50 p.m. w.e.f. May 2001 to 11 March 2004
    3. Compensate for extensive damage to premises due to poor upkeep and continuous closure of premises by the Bank. Antique wooden doors and other fixtures taken away under the Bank’s supervision at the time of shifting of Zonal Audit Cell to the said premises in 1994.
    4. Payment of arrears of water tax and house tax in respect of the said premises for the period it was in the possession of the Bank.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

வரலாற்று உண்மைகளை அலசுவோமே

வரலாற்று உண்மைகளை அலசுவோமே

வரலாற்று உண்மைகளை அலசுவோமே

Dwindling In Unbelief

வரலாற்று உண்மைகளை அலசுவோமே

Larry Hurtado's Blog

Comments on the New Testament and Early Christianity (and related matters)

TaborBlog

Religion Matters from the Bible to the Modern World

தமிழன்

வரலாற்று உண்மைகளை அலசுவோமே

வரலாற்று உண்மைகளை அலசுவோமே

இறையில்லா இஸ்லாம்

வரலாற்று உண்மைகளை அலசுவோமே

JESUS? CHRIST?- Gospels are Legends

வரலாற்று உண்மைகளை அலசுவோமே

வரலாற்று உண்மைகளை அலசுவோமே

கிறிஸ்தவம் பலானது

உண்மைகளை அறிவோம் தீமைகளை விரட்டுவோம்

World Watch- Devapriyaji

வரலாற்று உண்மைகளை அலசுவோமே

%d bloggers like this: